Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ghislaine Maxwell Fallout

Channel

Ghislaine Maxwell Fallout

@ghislainemaxwell

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

993subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001564473179
TypeChannel
Username@ghislainemaxwell
Created25 November 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ghislainemaxwell

Growth

9939979956 August 2026 — 997 subscribers6 August 2026 — 997 subscribers13 August 2026 — 993 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 992–998 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 16:05993-4
6 Aug 2026, 13:17997no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:30997first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 July 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

10 Apr 2023, 21:52 UTC≈7,800 viewsread 6 August 2026

Keep in mind: There is a Telegram account named after this channel, using the same picture. That person -IS NOT- me. I will be leaking all information I can get on this person as I get it.

8 Dec 2022, 18:22 UTC≈9,510 viewsread 6 August 2026

Twitter is under new management and ChatGPT is revolutionizing everything. These developments have a HUGE impact on the subjects and topics we care about here. Learn how to use Twitter and ChatGDP to become better researchers and OSINT talent. This invite is good for 100 invites, so join ASAP 🥳 https://discord.gg/9fQn3EtT

21 Nov 2022, 16:20 UTC≈7,940 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

https://twitter.com/CultStateDotCom/status/1594726975624691713

24 Oct 2022, 11:19 UTC≈7,640 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

https://twitter.com/CultStateDotCom/status/1584504706768199681

6 Oct 2022, 15:55 UTC≈7,580 viewsread 6 August 2026

https://mobile.twitter.com/TyrantsMuse/status/1578050920306425857

27 Sept 2022, 18:27 UTC≈7,630 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

https://twitter.com/CultStateDotCom/status/1574827850145882113

14 Sept 2022, 04:24 UTC≈7,470 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

https://twitter.com/CultStateDotCom/status/1569904628912775169

5 Sept 2022, 16:53 UTC≈6,310 viewsread 6 August 2026

https://mobile.twitter.com/TyrantsMuse/status/1566831410505256960

25 Aug 2022, 17:27 UTC≈5,920 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

https://twitter.com/CultStateDotCom/status/1562850904004444161

12 Aug 2022, 19:36 UTC≈5,530 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

https://twitter.com/CultStateDotCom/status/1558175441906696192

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ghislainemaxwell. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 397,627 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ghislaine Maxwell Fallout” (@ghislainemaxwell), 993 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ghislainemaxwell.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.