Channel
@NarrativeReframes
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
10,703subscribers
-49 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001206773705 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NarrativeReframes |
| Created | 25 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NarrativeReframes |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:14 | 10,703 | -3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:22 | 10,706 | -3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:51 | 10,709 | -16 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:37 | 10,725 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:17 | 10,730 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:55 | 10,733 | -17 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:42 | 10,750 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:15 | 10,752 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:50 | 10,752 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 October 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 August 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
If you're concerned about propaganda, narrative warfare, soft power, culture war, and influence operations, we are studying "psychosecurity". It's the research of treating language not as a marker of individual intelligence, but as the byproduct of an organ. (Like bile or blood) From this approach, we can measure the impact of influence operations on individuals and groups in near real-time If this kind of resear…
The account of the user that owns this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If it remains inactive in the next 17 days, that account will self-destruct and this channel may no longer have an owner.
The account of the user that owns this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If it remains inactive in the next 20 days, that account will self-destruct and this channel may no longer have an owner.
Small, independent - an excellent job of covering this trial from inside the courthouse since Day 1.
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
System is doing everything it can to convince people that vaccine/mandate opposition is just a small fringe group of people. Here’s a “live” camera feed of Piazza Unità Trieste showing an empty square when it’s really wall to wall with green pass protesters. Join @electricbeings789
An important documentary to watch https://youtu.be/UNg3Vnfu4Pk
Wonder why a UK commonwealth nation would be allowed to develop bioweapons… maybe it has something to do with all the genomics work that power continued after WW2…
Did you know Namibia is a member of the Commonwealth? And that the US has banned travel there? And that Namibia is allowed to develop bioweapons? And that they recently rejected a German attempt to pay them off? And that they signed up for a TerraMar initiative? https://twitter.com/CultStateDotCom/status/1464547726251732994
Feel free to review the entire timeline of Ghislaine Maxwell, courtesy of Getty Images. Also, feel free to correlate some of these photo times with things like UK, Saudi, and US geopolitical interests. You might find some neato things. https://twitter.com/CultStateDotCom/status/1464358230663086081
👆 Spies and their lies, and the implosion that’s 104+ years in the making. If you’re not paying close attention it’s time to understand the real reset that’s happening. https://twitter.com/ajenglish/status/1466644659002880000?s=21
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @NarrativeReframes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
There’s a lot going on in the world right now. What topics do you want to read about? (Multiple selections allowed)
The shares total 209%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 October 2021 to 30 August 2023. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 683,041 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@NarrativeReframes named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Narrative Reframes” (@NarrativeReframes), 10,703 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NarrativeReframes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.