Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for خليك هبيديولوجي

Channel

خليك هبيديولوجي

@gggggg5031

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

178subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002398411321
TypeChannel
Username@gggggg5031
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/gggggg5031

Growth

1781801799 August 2026 — 180 subscribers10 August 2026 — 179 subscribers17 August 2026 — 178 subscribers25 August 2026 — 179 subscribers1 September 2026 — 180 subscribers10 September 2026 — 178 subscribers9 August 202610 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 32 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 178–180 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 22:22178-2
1 Sept 2026, 02:19180+1
25 Aug 2026, 07:43179+1
17 Aug 2026, 19:36178-1
10 Aug 2026, 19:58179-1
9 Aug 2026, 20:32180first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 21s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

127 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣8869.3%
😁2015.7%
😭118.66%
53.94%
👍10.787%
👏10.787%
🤨10.787%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 127 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 12:40 UTC52 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

ليس من العجب أن يرتفع النقيضين، ولكن من العجب أن يتكلم الشيعي برسالة طرفها الأول لا ينسخ طرفها الأخر..

🤣5

26 Jul 2026, 16:41 UTC148 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

😁4👏1🤣1😭1

25 Jul 2026, 14:12 UTC128 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

المقطع الذي يقول فيه كمال الحيدري وينسب لابن تيمية، يعني يتأول الكلام وهذا الحمار الفيمبويز حتى فهم كلام كمال ابو طربوش من مؤخرته... كمال الحيدري يعلق فيقول يعني الله 12 سنة يوصل له التقرير، والشيعي مفكر كمال الحيدري بيقول ابن تيمية قال

😁5

25 Jul 2026, 14:10 UTC115 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

يسألني قارئ لابن تيمية علشان قلت عنه أعجوبة، وهو سامع عن ابن تيمية من كمال الحيدري وجاي يصدعنا، يخربيت القرف.

🤣5😭1

25 Jul 2026, 12:36 UTC101 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

كنت زمان بقول بيقرأوا اسمي غلط، لكن دلوقتي مفيش قصر بصر بقى في غباء.. كاتب عبد الشافي ويقلي اسمك معناه عبد للشافعي؟

🤣6😁1

24 Jul 2026, 16:18 UTC97 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

في سؤال محيرني: ليش بعض الصوفية والشيعة إذا شافوا أهل السنة وأهل الحديث يثنون على ابن تيمية أو يدافعون عنه، قالوا: "أنتم تعبدون ابن تيمية من دون الله"؟ بينما في المقابل، تجد عند بعضهم تعظيم شديد لعلمائهم وأصحاب المقامات، حتى يصل الأمر إلى التوسل بهم أو طلب قضاء الحاجات والشفاء منهم، ومع ذلك يُقال: هذا مجرد تعظيم لمكانتهم! فمدح ابن تيمية = عبادة لابن تيمية. وطلب الشفاء من الأولياء ≠ عبادة الأولياء. ايه القرف اللي ا

🤣5😁3👍1

21 Jul 2026, 20:48 UTC121 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

ما هو لازم اطعن في ابن تيمية بس ابان فاهم الموضوع.

🤣6😭1

21 Jul 2026, 15:18 UTC121 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

عبد الكريم الكثيري يستخدم التقية ويكفر محمد ابن شمس الدين ويزندقه فقط...

4🤣3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @gggggg5031. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“خليك هبيديولوجي” (@gggggg5031), 178 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gggggg5031.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.