Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for bato_gg

Channel

bato_gg

@gg_bato

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

670subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 8 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001550681866
TypeChannel
Username@gg_bato
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 September 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/gg_bato

Growth

6706766738 September 2026 — 676 subscribers8 September 2026 — 676 subscribers11 September 2026 — 675 subscribers19 September 2026 — 670 subscribers8 September 202619 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 11 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 669–677 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 10:17670-5
11 Sept 2026, 02:36675-1
8 Sept 2026, 06:22676no change
8 Sept 2026, 05:47676first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 24 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2h 45m
Average length
27m 34s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

760 reactions across 18 posts, in 39 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤14018.4%
custom 5433830917380515230597.76%
❤‍🔥597.76%
custom 5350805918193828406587.63%
custom 5206616504493168556557.24%
😈364.74%
🍓314.08%
custom 5220171575898169193303.95%
🔥303.95%
🐳283.68%
custom 5350679955392975062233.03%
💯233.03%
🗿192.50%
custom 5404870554199027311162.11%
custom 5454185587735010839151.97%
💋151.97%
custom 5366044724153043382141.84%
⚡121.58%
💘111.45%
🍌101.32%
19 further kinds7610.0%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 760 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 24 December 2024 to 8 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 18 we hold a reading for · 22%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @gg_bato. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 December 2024 to 8 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Apr 2026, 14:39 UTC≈1,170 views34 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Photo

так-то если по судить деле СДВГ это жесткий диагноз, это указание на нарушение функции префронтальной коры, а это сновная мозга в плане перехода от обезьяньих, первичных позывов к человеческим, сложным. так оно?! СДВГ это форма своеобразная форма слабоумия по сути и содержанию. а если епть человеку лень, если он кайфушник с перегретыми рецепторами это не СДВГ, это просто плохое воспитание и самоконтроль. челы с г…

custom 536604472415304338214❤‍🔥6🍌5🔥5custom 52197877131960804264

14 Mar 2026, 23:28 UTC≈1,470 views29 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 540487055419902731114❤7😈4❤‍🔥2🔥2

21 Jun 2025, 04:05 UTC≈6,050 views39 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Video

одна из первых лекций по гормонам, которую Я посмотрел лет в 16, думаю, вам будет интересно и полезно 00:00 - Вступление - история с каплунами и петухами 02:33 - Опыты 1848 года по кастрации петухов 05:15 - Понятие о гормональной регуляции 07:45 - Что такое гормоны - определение 10:30 - Железы внутренней секреции 13:20 - Другие органы, производящие гормоны 16:10 - Классификация гормонов по химической природе 20:25 …

custom 543383091738051523023❤7🔥5custom 54048705541990273112❤‍🔥1💊1

31 May 2025, 16:00 UTC≈4,500 views57 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Photo

👹

custom 543383091738051523035❤10❤‍🔥9⚡3

8 May 2025, 15:05 UTC≈5,050 views41 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Video

David Goggins ru, base🤩 (аудио в комментах)

😈22💯9❤‍🔥5❤3🖕2

24 Apr 2025, 16:01 UTC≈4,440 views47 reactions1 Starread 8 September 2026
Video

внутривенно🌟

🔥16custom 53508059181938284067💯6🦄4❤3🤬3😈3💋2

2 Apr 2025, 12:20 UTC≈4,330 views50 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Video

РАЗБОР ЛИЦА от егора🤩 1:10 🌟 -убрать отеки (90% людей есть проблемы с этим я в том числе) -похудеть± -качать определённые мышцы лица (гимнастика) -убрать все прыщи ВОТ ВООБЩЕ ВСЕ, даже если у тебя как и у меня 2-3 прыщика это -40% привлекательности; -исправить питание (сыроедение+голодание) -физ-активность -знать как читать лица людей 🌟

custom 535080591819382840634❤8🍌5🍓2custom 54338309173805152301

3 Mar 2025, 09:59 UTC≈4,310 views55 reactions2 Starsread 8 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤27custom 535080591819382840615🐳7💘5😈1

9 Feb 2025, 05:41 UTC≈4,030 views32 reactionsread 8 September 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

🐳21⚡4🏆3custom 53508059181938284062❤1💘1

8 Feb 2025, 03:17 UTC≈3,410 views36 reactionsread 8 September 2026

ключевой принцип сохранения здоровья — это перестать стимулировать и начать спонсировать.

🍓23🆒7❤‍🔥3🖕2💘1

18 Jan 2025, 07:10 UTC≈4,300 views70 reactionsread 8 September 2026

пролактин высокий у человека, который убежден в том, что с ним поступили несправедливо

custom 520661650449316855632custom 545418558773501083915❤‍🔥10✍4💋2🔥2❤1🍾1

16 Jan 2025, 02:00 UTC≈4,320 views48 reactionsread 8 September 2026
Photo

сахар это хуцпа🇨🇴 сократите его потребление в ноль, вы не представляете как оно влияет на гормональную систему, особенно мужчины... 🌟и тэйк о том что "сахар из фруктов и промышленный (синтезированный) не отличаются" ПОЛНАЯ ЧУШЬ, вы где-нибудь видели чтобы кто-то насвинячился виноградом и от этого ожирел?!а от шоколадки?!🌟 😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡

custom 520661650449316855623❤‍🔥8🍓5❤3⚡2💘2😈2🍾1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @gg_bato. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Простые Мысли
@prostyemisli · 48,104
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 8 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“bato_gg” (@gg_bato), 670 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gg_bato.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.