Channel
@gg68899
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,482subscribers
+78 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003594792555 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gg68899 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gg68899 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:58 | 1,482 | +20 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:04 | 1,462 | +48 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:01 | 1,414 | +10 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:01 | 1,404 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (26 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 10,371 |
| Reactions total | 20 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 01:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
20 reactions across 9 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 20 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
@anyi988 #东城 安怡，08年四川妹子 【价格】600p 【身高体重】160cm，88斤 【胸】纯天然C罩杯，小水滴偏圆盘脂肪胸，很软，手感不错，乳头浅棕 【腰臀】细腰，有点小肚子，屁股不大但有肉，腰臀比挺不错的 【腿】细腿 【皮肤】冷白皮，无符文，皮肤嫩滑 【颜值】人照5-6分，中颜，真人脸比较骨感，稍稍显老 【服务】XZC，中🐍有69，不能长时间🐍，🐍吻有烟味，陪洗简单，口活中规中矩，无齿感，69无异味，服务态度不错，也很用心 【情绪价值】性格挺好的一个女生，能开玩笑，但稍微缺乏对客人的情绪输出，在意的需要注意‼️ 【做爱反馈】做爱反馈其实挺不错的，叫声自然不假，但全身敏感点基本上没有，所以你如果擅长调情的话在做爱时会缺少成就感，女上还不错，会两三个体位，也愿意动不会偷懒，配合度不错，传教士脚柔韧性不高，所以不能做太大幅度的压腿，后入风景好，干着白嫩S型身材很享受，小穴水蛮多的，很润，总体性爱体验水准之上。 【…
所在城市：#东城 老师名称： #安怡 @anyi988 川妹子 上课价格： 600p 妹子年龄：18 妹子容貌： 8成 妹子身材： C杯 瘦底大胸 白皮 没有纹身 皮肤很好很滑 服务态度： 热情健谈 🐍管饱 有69但我没有试 环境设备： 公寓 自由评论: 这两天看两位大佬反馈来了个大胸白皮颜值也不错的妹子，昨天约不上今晚终于约上，遥控到课室一开门见到妹子我就知道这个适合我胃口很手脚都很白，化个淡妆白皮就是好看，二话不说交💰，妹子边数💰我拉开衣服看看奶子我滴妈又白又大又挺上手一摸很软奶头小颜色淡棕色，妹子看着猥琐的我两眼一对视我就🐍上去虽然有点烟味也档不住我的兽性，上下其手后脱光光进洗浴室，看这C奶白皮颜值也不错的妹子我肉棒硬棒棒，妹子帮洗很认真都笑话我怎么这么硬，我说你太吸引我了又🐍上去😂，有一…
❤3
#东城 安怡 @anyi988 价格：6p 身:160 娇小 小腹平坦 细枝硕果 胸:c胸 纯天然 饱满 胸型好看 手感很好 颜色浅粉 皮:白皮 又滑又嫩 手感很好 腿:白长直 臀:小蜜桃臀好翘 圆圆的 腰臀比很好 后入极佳 妹: 润 不算紧会夹 户型🦋B 69不能🐍 我选🐍了 颜值情况：真人7分像，跟频道图片差不多 浓妆 说话声音 甜甜的，是个甜妹 情绪价值:很好，进门会热情的跟你打招呼，还可以来个拥抱 ，安怡也很爱笑。 真的眼前一亮，我进门就夸安怡说她皮肤白，也说她🦵好看好白，上手一下好滑摸得我爱不释手的。真像小雨雨🦵够直大 漱完口就跟安怡🐍吻 安怡👅头软软的，就是🐍久了🈶点烟味，正在沙发🐍得起劲，安怡就甜甜的说给我放热水洗澡，我说别走让我看一下你屁股先，我就一脱安怡裙子，映入眼帘白花花臀蹦岀来圆圆的类似蜜桃臀😍再脱去上衣两个可爱的大白兔蹦岀来，安怡还会走近给你边舔胸边玩她翘翘蜜桃臀，我刚想摸下一下蜜穴，安怡就说不🉑…
❤2
#东城 安怡 @anyi988 6p 19s，160cm，45kg，C+，白皮，🚬，无纹身。自聊，川妹妹，人照接近，大眼灵动活泼可爱邻家小妹妹，举止得体，笑脸迎客，挺乖巧的印象分不错。皮肤白皙嫩滑，肉嘟嘟的婴儿肥，真是卡哇伊🤏 👍👍瘦底大胸，有点小肚肚没影响，身材跟puyou接近，熊还要大一丢丢，雪白的胸脯手感很好，🐻奴必冲 👍👍冷白皮，有点婴儿肥更可爱辣，软糯糯的pp手感一绝，几乎是煮啵抓过手感最好的pp 👍👍ok紧，润，配合，后入会塌腰，反馈很赞，下下有回声，娇滴滴的喘声相当动听 🆗有🐍和69，半个小蟒蛇，69挺敏感，会撒娇求饶。 👎口的时间有点短，69后可能不给🐍 她那软软糯糯的手感、如雪粉嫩的胸脯、绵软柔和的性格，突然让煮啵想起好多故人 食评转自https://t.me/Dgyummy005 东莞美食指南https://t.me/At6688aa 美食指南聊天室 https://t…
❤1
#大朗 小萌 @xiaomeng6626 #700P 💭类型： #清纯 #嫩妹 #小只马 #匈奴狂喜 👀颜值：人照 9.9 分 清纯学妹 ⛄️身形：娇俏小只马 ✨胸型：圆盘型饱满小 C🐻 ⏳臀腿：小圆臀 小细腿 hhh ☀️简述：07 年江西小小只马 mm，双端在线可撩 ~，155+cm/37kg，一身粉嫩 JK，人照一致，素颜见面，女高学妹既视感拉满，清纯气息扑面而来🙏；皮肤白皙，手感水嫩细腻，吹弹可破，无纹身好评；一对圆盘型饱满小 C🐻，脂肪胸手感软乎乎，微微外扩但挺翘在线；这小身材配上这对丰满，格外吸睛；三点粉嫩，私密处刚刚精心修剪，春光一览无余，干净且诱人；瘦瘦小小的一只，肉量虽不多却完全没有排骨感，腰肢纤细到双手一握几乎能完全搂住，臀圆腿直，但都是 mini 版 hhh😐，整体就是一块香香软软的小蛋糕；有🐍可 69，小蟒蛇妹妹～ 吃技水平在线，自带娇羞感，吸含舔弄时间很久，小小的嘴巴还会轻轻尝试一下深喉，泪目了…
❤1
#南城 @yaoyao5611 瑶瑶，18岁湖南妹子 【价格】700p 【身高体重】160cm，88斤 【胸】纯天然C+罩杯，木瓜脂肪胸，手感不错，一手不能掌握，乳头深紫 【腰臀】细腰，无赘肉，屁股不大但有一定肌肉，腰臀比还可以 【腿】筷子腿 【皮肤】黄黑皮，双手腕各有一处小符文，皮肤中规中矩 【颜值】人照7-8分，真人比照片好看点，中颜稍稍偏上，大眼睛👀可爱型 【服务】XZC，小🐍有69，陪洗简单，口活有齿感，69无异味 【情绪价值】是个偏被动但句句有回应的女生，能开玩笑，有一定幽默感在，也蛮爱笑的，笑起来好看，某程度上有女友感。 【做爱反馈】做爱反馈偏弱，会根据自己的喜好调整姿势，会告诉你喜欢这样，不喜欢这样，这样做会痛，相对有自己的想法，女上技术还可以，女上画面好，做爱时手会在你身上指划，也可以边🐍边嘟，脚的柔韧度不好，有些抬腿动作做不了，在局限范围内有配合度，小穴水蛮多的，所以包裹感不高，但会夹，整体做爱体验中规中…
❤2
#南城 @nannan0802 嘟嘟妹19岁自聊 黄皮手感不错 168身材非排骨 河南妹 海口过来东莞开的 颜值中颜 7分像 浓妆 本人很腼腆 但不错是好逼。 又是盘爽 🐍爽 干爽的一天，跟菜菜那样好玩，排课也很充足 河南妹，就是🈶点腼腆。但听话配合，排课很充足不催😁😁😁也适合胸奴跟葡呦一样的奶子小c 好挺手感很好 很饱满😍微粉，血管都看的到 抓得我爱不释手的 还给我喂奶 还🈶在镜子前调情太爽了，好色情好淫荡啊！ 妹子穿上制服侧看着若隐若现奶好诱人，我上嘴舔了一下😍 嘟感也不错包裹感足也很润，能边🐍边嘟，屁股也大后入很爽能操盘，大🦋B🈶点敏感，舔久了会发抖，反馈也很真实，嘟得越猛越大声，传教士腿还会夹人夹得紧紧的，就是爱吐口水也可能不习惯原因。😂 还有点肚子也🈶点驼背😓 但妹子很听劝，就是上位不怎么会要教才行，🈶空就返，这种嫩难得👍能调教引导服务看你会不会玩了，反正我爽了😂😂😂 推荐：🐍教胸奴🐺友 狼友反馈：b➕ 拉到…
❤1
#南城 #瑶瑶 @yaoyao5611 价格 ：7p 性价比不高 身:160 娇小 小腹平坦 细枝硕果 黄皮 胸:36C➕ 天然胸真的香香软软的大白兔，手感巨好 颜色浅棕色，奶头一边乳晕大一边乳晕小奇怪了 腿:不粗不细 臀:小圆臀 带点翘 腰臀比不错 后入视觉巴适 妹: 毛少像白🐅 又润加浅粉 69干净无味好吃，对了69不能🐍 颜值情况：浓妆真人7分像，真人图片好看 幼态脸可可爱爱的 情绪价值：慢热型，对陌生客户比较防备，玩不开，但🈶问会答，在床上配合度也是可以的，好家伙还会夸人，夸我时间卡的好。我在沙发给了钱，我就开始验牌，先看看肚子先，哟确实没小肚腩噢，看完就一拉瑶瑶到我怀你，然后直接一拉瑶瑶直接抱着她小蛮腰说：就夸她身材不错，夸完就背后揉了一下她的胸，好家伙真🈶实力，隔着毛衣都觉得大，然后试了一下🐍，我说瑶瑶你伸👅头啊，瑶瑶就回了一句，我👅头就那么短，就很扣分了，🐍起来🈶点烟味，没办法第一天连濑口水没卖。👅头只能吃到…
❤4
#东城 #温婉 @wenwann520 #700P 💭类型： #御姐 #苗条 #大长腿 #细枝硕果 颜值：人照8分 御姐脸 身形：御姐型细枝硕果 胸型：水滴💧丰满E🐻 臀腿：臀线柔和 纤细长腿 ☀️简述：川渝00年高挑御姐型mm，自聊可撩，真人带妆人照8分， 看得出来平时有做美容保养；身高170cm95斤，身材十分苗条，四六分身段比例，第一眼就很抓人；皮肤黄皮小白，无纹身好评；胸前一对丰满水滴💧E杯，奶头浅褐色，自然垂坠，手感软嫩如水球，一手难以掌握，搭配明显锁骨，显得格外性感诱人；腰肢纤细，小腹平坦，整体身段错落有致，细腰丰胸形成鲜明对比，真就是细枝硕果；臀部圆润，线条自然流畅，再多些肉感会更加完美；一双大长腿纤细修长，肉骨比例恰到好处，臀腿衔接曲线顺滑舒展；舔咪➕XCZ，🈶🐍🈶69，吃技娴熟，女上位功力深厚，腰臀扭动有力，整体配合度高，虽然嘴上说着不要不要了，但身体却很诚实；性格健谈，服务态度好，DO感及配合度🉑，相处下来…
❤2
所在城市：#南城 老师名称： 清瑶 @qingSyao 上课价格： 600p 妹子年龄：18 妹子容貌： 8成 幼态脸 妹子身材： 160左右 胸B+ 无纹身 服务态度： 任盘 🐍管饱 女骑手 环境设备： 公寓 自由评论: 停课很久的清瑶终于开课，约好时间遥控到课，开门一看果然是幼态脸萌妹子，还是童颜才是我的菜，进门之后验一下胸先，手一摸一手抓满胸又挺又大B+不错立刻交💰，衣服一脱嫩嫩的身材一览无余肉棒都情不自禁硬棒棒，洗澡去妹子很认真帮洗我也很认真上下其手摸胸摸屁股，有一次性毛巾和漱口水有帮忙擦身这个服务很到位，上床躺下老师先吸一下我胸，还会用舌头打转，然后再含肉捧不得不说这口技很专业无齿感，深喉再用舌头在🐢头上打转再加速上下含，虽然没有69被她口技惊艳了，不叫停她真可以口爆出来，接着上套妹子直接女上开局，没想到她坐上去直接开车原来是个女骑手上下动速度还挺快感觉被她桩我😂，我也不敢示弱🐍上去妹子舌头很软再吸奶子，接着叫她…
❤4
所在城市：#东城 老师名称：小雨 @xiaomo080709cc 上课价格： 700p 妹子年龄：18 妹子容貌：照片7~8 成 妹子身材： C胸 身材比例好 服务态度： 态度好 环境设备： 公寓 自由评论: 关注很久终于见面，可能期待值高进门妹子淡妆没有照片惊艳，身材是对标C胸窈窕身材也是个嫩妹黄皮感觉还不错，笑起来也挺好看交💰上课，接着脱光光那C胸很挺我直接上手摸起来手感很软不错小腹平坦腿也很细，立刻拉去洗澡帮洗很认真有一次性毛巾和牙刷，上床先让她先亲一口（没有🐍）接着让她69很嫩的小🦋干净无异味，口的差不多上套传教士慢慢插入到底，我口吸右胸手抓左胸接着猛的抽插，妹子呻吟声在耳边围绕，妹子奶头比较敏感不给大力吸，不得不说嫩妹的胸真是好吃又好抓，接着侧入后入女上动作换一遍妹子都很配合，妹水也很多抽插过程摸一下湿湿的，态度很好。 综合评价：妹子胸和身材很不错，虽然没什么惊艳中规中矩嫩妹三件套，态度好很配合点赞，就是没有蛇D…
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @gg68899. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 316,600 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@gg68899 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东莞美食探店” (@gg68899), 1,482 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gg68899.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.