Channel
@aqaq7621
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,998subscribers
+20 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002245696154 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @aqaq7621 |
| Created | Between 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/aqaq7621 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 18:05 | 3,998 | +20 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:52 | 3,978 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:33 | 3,978 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (18 July 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 19,450 |
| Reactions total | 15 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 05:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
15 reactions across 5 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 15 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🐔哥大蟒🐍严选 pinned «艺名：东城安怡 18岁川渝妹妹，自聊线上很热情，宝宝宝宝那样叫😊 账号：@anyi988 价格：6p 性价比可以 硬件好👍 身:160 娇小 小腹平坦 细枝硕果 胸:c胸 纯天然 饱满 胸型好看 手感很好 颜色浅粉 皮:白皮 又滑又嫩 手感很好 腿:白长直 臀:小蜜桃臀好翘 圆圆的 腰臀比很好 后入极佳 妹: 润 不算紧会夹 户型🦋B 69不能🐍 我选🐍了 颜值情况：真人7分像，跟频道图片差不多 浓妆 说话声音 甜甜的，是个甜妹 情绪价值:很好，进门会热情的跟你打招呼，还可以来个拥抱 ，安怡也很爱笑。 …»
🐔哥大蟒🐍严选 pinned a photo
🐔哥大蟒🐍严选 pinned a photo
艺名：东城安怡 18岁川渝妹妹，自聊线上很热情，宝宝宝宝那样叫😊 账号：@anyi988 价格：6p 性价比可以 硬件好👍 身:160 娇小 小腹平坦 细枝硕果 胸:c胸 纯天然 饱满 胸型好看 手感很好 颜色浅粉 皮:白皮 又滑又嫩 手感很好 腿:白长直 臀:小蜜桃臀好翘 圆圆的 腰臀比很好 后入极佳 妹: 润 不算紧会夹 户型🦋B 69不能🐍 我选🐍了 颜值情况：真人7分像，跟频道图片差不多 浓妆 说话声音 甜甜的，是个甜妹 情绪价值:很好，进门会热情的跟你打招呼，还可以来个拥抱 ，安怡也很爱笑。 真的眼前一亮，我进门就夸安怡说她皮肤白，也说她🦵好看好白，安怡就说：不要夸了夸得我合不拢嘴的，给了钱我就抱着安怡撒娇的说，好想拍照🦵那么白给我拍一下嘛！安怡就说不行，好吧不能拍我能摸就行了，上手一下好滑摸得我爱不释手的。真像小雨雨🦵够直长白 漱完口就跟安怡🐍吻 安怡👅头软软的，就是🐍久了🈶点烟味，正在沙发🐍得起劲，安怡就甜甜…
❤5
Video, posted without a caption
🐔哥大蟒🐍严选 pinned a photo
@nannan0802 嘟嘟妹19岁自聊 黄皮手感不错 168身材非排骨 河南妹 海口过来东莞开的 颜值中颜 7分像 浓妆 本人很腼腆 但不错是好逼。 又是盘爽 🐍爽 干爽的一天，跟菜菜那样好玩，排课也很充足 河南妹，就是🈶点腼腆。但听话配合，排课很充足不催😁😁😁也适合胸奴跟葡呦一样的奶子小c 好挺手感很好 很饱满😍微粉，血管都看的到 抓得我爱不释手的 还给我喂奶 还🈶在镜子前调情太爽了，好色情好淫荡啊！ 妹子穿上制服侧看着若隐若现奶好诱人，我上嘴舔了一下😍 嘟感也不错包裹感足也很润，能边🐍边嘟，屁股也大后入很爽能操盘，大🦋B🈶点敏感，舔久了会发抖，反馈也很真实，嘟得越猛越大声，传教士腿还会夹人夹得紧紧的，就是爱吐口水也可能不习惯原因。😂 还有点肚子也🈶点驼背😓 但妹子很听劝，就是上位不怎么会要教才行，🈶空就返，这种嫩难得👍能调教引导服务看你会不会玩了，反正我爽了😂😂😂 推荐：🐍教胸奴🐺友 狼友反馈：b➕ 拉到夯：人上人
❤3
🐔哥大蟒🐍严选 pinned Deleted message
🐔哥大蟒🐍严选 pinned a photo
🐔哥大蟒🐍严选 pinned a video
🐔哥大蟒🐍严选 pinned a photo
🐔哥大蟒🐍严选 pinned «艺名:瑶瑶 18岁 大亚湾过来开童颜巨乳 代聊很热情聊了好多😂 账号：@yaoyao5611 价格 ：7p 性价比不高 身:160 娇小 小腹平坦 细枝硕果 皮:黄皮 手感不行 胸:36C➕ 天然胸真的香香软软的大白兔，手感巨好 颜色浅棕色，奶头一边乳晕大一边乳晕小奇怪了😂 腿:不粗不细 臀:小圆臀 带点翘 腰臀比不错 后入视觉巴适 妹: 毛少像白🐅 又润加浅粉 69干净无味好吃，对了69不能🐍 颜值情况：浓妆真人8分像，真人比图片好看 幼态脸可可爱爱的，说话也好听。 情绪价值：一般吧，因为慢热型，对陌…»
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @aqaq7621. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 353,732 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🐔哥大蟒🐍严选” (@aqaq7621), 3,998 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aqaq7621.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.