Channel
@gezVerbot
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
228subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001217066036 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gezVerbot |
| Description | GEZ Verbieten |
| Created | 13 May 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gezVerbot |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:01 | 228 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:38 | 228 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 17 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Hitzewelle Nach der wirren Darstellung der Tagesschau wird die gewöhnliche Hitze in Sommer durch Falschmeldungen im Internet reaktiviert. Die Berichterstattung bringt das Klima Narrativ in den Framing Rahmen, welches somit nicht weiter angezweifelt werden darf und bestätigt gleichzeitig die Lüge vom Medien Menschen gemachten Klimawandel TM, weil alle Gegenbeweise von nun an als relativ gelten. Im Klartext auch w…
Framing
Hitzewelle
Photo, posted without a caption
GEZ Vollstreckung Die GEZ hat das Vollstreckungsersuchen nur wegen der fehlenden Rechtskraft zurück genommen. 👉 Diese kann allerdings nachgeholt werden und zu einem neuen Versuch führen. 👉👉 Dieses nebensächliche Detail wird gerade von vielen Kanälen falsch dargestellt. Es ist natürlich gut wenn dem System Sand ins Getriebe gesteckt wird, das gilt vor allem für die GEZ. Aber man sollte die Hintergründe transpar…
Subtile Propaganda
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Fensehkonsumenten wenn ihnen der Fernseher ausgeschlossen wird. 🙈 @gezVerbot 🐻
😡KiKA veröffentlicht Clips gegen weißen Rassismus Der aus dem öffentlich-rechtlichen Kindermedienangebot von ARD und ZDF bestehende Kinderkanal KiKA hat eine Offensive gegen „Weiße“ gestartet, die „Schwarze“ mit ihrem Verhalten ausgrenzen. In einem der Werbe-Clips werden beispielsweise Hüte mit Stromschlägen gegen Haar-Grabscher vorgeschlagen. In einem anderen wird der Opa wegen seiner Witze als Rassist auf dem Kin…
🙈
Viele BRD-Sklaven zahlen gerne und bereitwillig 18,36 € "Rundfunkbeitrag" zur zwangsweisen Finanzierung der verkommenen Systempropaganda. Das ist es, was sie dafür bekommen, und genau das ist es, was sie verdienen! BRD - einmal drin, alles hin! https://t.me/Pockenaffen
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @gezVerbot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,025,598 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GEZ Verbot und Lügenpresse” (@gezVerbot), 228 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gezVerbot.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.