5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,176–3,189 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 13:23
3,180
-7
9 Aug 2026, 15:17
3,187
+9
6 Aug 2026, 14:01
3,178
+1
6 Aug 2026, 04:49
3,177
no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:55
3,177
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 25 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 06s
Average length
33s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,209 reactions across 20 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
455
37.6%
🔥
326
27.0%
👍
149
12.3%
🍌
52
4.30%
💊
26
2.15%
👏
19
1.57%
🫡
19
1.57%
🙏
15
1.24%
🤝
15
1.24%
☃
13
1.08%
🎄
11
0.91%
🎉
11
0.91%
👀
11
0.91%
🥰
11
0.91%
🐳
10
0.827%
🌭
9
0.744%
🦄
9
0.744%
❤🔥
7
0.579%
💯
7
0.579%
💘
6
0.496%
10 further kinds
28
2.32%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,209reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 December 2025 to 11 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
724
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 20 we hold a reading for · 65%
Most on one post
311
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @getchainsim. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 December 2025 to 11 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Chainsim - your crypto fortress in the storm 🏰
TON is becoming GRAM.
BTC is falling.
Chainsim? The floor keeps climbing.
Yesterday, the average daily sale price of a Chainsim number on Getgems hit a new quarterly high - 59 TON.
The floor remains at 6.9 TON, while the biggest sale reached 300 TON for +000 00 888 088 - originally minted just 8 months ago for 10 TON.
Real demand. Active holders. Growing ecosystem.
…
Anonymous numbers? Anonymous agents 🤖
AI agents are becoming the next interface layer of the internet. Soon they’ll be inside every app and service.
Chainsim is building for that future.
A lot of people have been asking what exactly we’re preparing behind the scenes. Time to reveal a small part of it.
The next generation of Chainsim functionality will simplify integrations for partners and unlock entirely new use…
Missed us?
We’re here. And we’ve been building.
Chainsim is preparing a new wave of features that will redefine the product for both users and partners. At the same time, we’re seeing growing interest from major players in the blockchain space - which means more users and increasing demand for existing Chainsim numbers on TON and Base.
Our focus is clear: accounts.
Chainsim is building an independent authorization…
Big news for Chainsim 🔥
Chainsim is now expanding beyond TON - we’ve launched support for Base.
Thanks to the Base team for the collaboration. This integration marks the beginning of Chainsim’s presence in a new ecosystem and opens the door to broader product development.
And we’re not arriving empty-handed.
End-to-end encrypted messaging is now live 🤫
You can now set up your encryption key using passkeys and send …
Recently, next-generation crypto trading app PocketFi has integrated Chainsim authorization - bringing blockchain-based login directly into active trading infrastructure.
Authorization through Big Tech is the past.
Chainsim is the future - independent, user-owned, unstoppable.
Experience it yourself in PocketFi 👈
Channel | Chat | OTC | 𝕏 | Support
Chainsim is preparing a major product update focused on functionality, scalability, and ecosystem growth.
Our development team is finalizing a new blockchain integration - a key step that will expand Chainsim’s infrastructure and open the door to faster releases moving forward.
Coming in March:
- New features to improve usability and performance
- Bridge connectivity for smoother cross-chain movement and broader a…
Today is a big day for Chainsim ✈️
We’ve submitted a PR proposing Chainsim blockchain authorization inside Telegram 🔥
Now we need you.
We’ve launched a petition on Change.org to support this initiative. The more signatures we collect, the louder our voice. This isn’t just a feature for Telegram - it’s a proof that Chainsim is a united community of people who believe in real digital freedom.
If you support decentra…
Important Alert🚨
If you want to mint your Chainsim number, is the last chance to do it.
Today at 23:59 UTC all the mints will stop - good news for all the holders ⚡️
Chainsim is officially stopping minting on February 16 at 23:59 UTC.
From that moment, Series 00 and Series 14 will be permanently closed - no re-drops, ever 🔒
What’s next: future series will only launch alongside major ecosystem updates - meaning every next drop will be tied to something big.
Which series is coming next and when is the drop?
That’s classified 🤫
If you’ve been thinking about securing 00 or 14 - t…
Chainsim Celebrates Valentine’s Day 💖
For the next 3 days, we’re launching a special campaign.
Give your loved one something meaningful - give them security with Chainsim.
You can mint a Chainsim number from the exclusive +000 14 Valentine’s edition at a special holiday price.
Mint your st Valentines number 👈
Limited series. 3 days only.
Channel | Chat | OTC | 𝕏 | Support
❤19💘6🔥5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @getchainsim. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 December 2025 to 11 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 329,209 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Chainsim NFT news” (@getchainsim), 3,180 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/getchainsim.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
