Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

gerontion

@gerontion

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

590subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001519190700
TypeChannel
Username@gerontion
Created6 August 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/gerontion

Growth

587590588.56 August 2026 — 587 subscribers6 August 2026 — 587 subscribers12 August 2026 — 590 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 587–590 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 16:53590+3
6 Aug 2026, 18:02587no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:54587first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

81 reactions across 15 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤩1619.8%
👍78.64%
💯78.64%
56.17%
🔥56.17%
🙈56.17%
🤔56.17%
44.94%
🙏44.94%
🌚33.70%
👻33.70%
💊22.47%
😁22.47%
😍22.47%
🤯22.47%
🦄22.47%
👌11.23%
👨‍💻11.23%
🕊11.23%
😨11.23%
3 further kinds33.70%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 81reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 7 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Jul 2026, 15:23 UTC293 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

https://fixupx.com/T3chFalcon/status/2074134314145489195

🌚1👍1🤷‍♂1

5 Jul 2026, 10:17 UTC295 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

https://www.quantamagazine.org/how-much-energy-does-it-take-to-think-20250604/

😁2👍1

4 Jul 2026, 13:36 UTC330 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💊2😍2

3 Jul 2026, 14:19 UTC217 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @gerontion_lit

https://telegra.ph/Kinzhal-07-03

3 Jul 2026, 14:19 UTC237 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @gerontion_lit

https://t.me/a_small_intricate_box/1455

2 Jul 2026, 15:29 UTC211 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @faelun_gongVideo

Video, posted without a caption

2 Jul 2026, 15:29 UTC246 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @faelun_gong

Воронка чужого сна. Делёз оставил предупреждение, которое легко принять за изящную метафору, но которое стоит читать буквально: остерегайтесь чужого сна — если вы попали в чьё-то чужое сновидение, вам конец. Спящий кажется самым безобидным существом на свете: неподвижный, отсутствующий, беззащитный. Но именно в этой неподвижности скрыта воля, и воля пожирающая. Сон не пассивен. Он втягивает. И тот, кто оказался внут

🔥2🕊1🤔1

2 Jul 2026, 15:15 UTC250 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Imagine a machine that could give you any experience you desired. Neuroscientists could stimulate your brain so that you'd believe you were living the most wonderful life — writing a great novel, making a friend, falling in love — while you actually floated in a tank, electrodes attached to your brain. You'd feel these experiences as completely real, with no way to tell them apart from genuine life. Once plugged in,

💯71

2 Jul 2026, 08:01 UTC224 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Поддержать автора канала можно на Boosty или с помощью криптовалюты (USDT TRC-20): TQKuG1rzDfZPHevM7BMKg5DsNdriSbHFCM

🙏4🥰1

2 Jul 2026, 07:38 UTC230 viewsread 6 August 2026

— Давайте начнём с честного, — сказал пациент. — Я много об этом думал. И мне кажется, что вся жизнь, если снять с неё украшения, сводится к одному-единственному выбору. Единственному настоящему. Вечное блаженство — или нет. Всё остальное — оговорки. Люди притворяются, что выбирают между работой и семьёй, между городами, между людьми, но на самом деле каждый раз они выбирают только количество удовольствия и его цену.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @gerontion. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 312,817 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“gerontion” (@gerontion), 590 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gerontion.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.