![Telegram profile photo for -_]'𝖦𝖾𝗈𝗐𝖺𝗋𝖾'';_-](https://cdn.tgregister.com/av/13/1335d37b140c307bb2b8af2b29e0261d2baa4134c7984c021d28faae9f4c0de1.jpg)
Channel
@geoware_dodnet
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
13subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003985995970 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @geoware_dodnet |
| Created | 8 August 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/geoware_dodnet |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 13 | -6 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 19 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:21 | 19 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:04 | 20 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 291 |
| Reactions total | 10 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 17:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
10 reactions across 6 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8 | 80.0% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️ прошел_небольшой_промежуток_времени...⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ впереди_что?_наркомания_социопатия_психушка_утопия?_*глоток*_у_меня_есть_еще_куча_проблем_которые_я_бы_предпочел_не_говорить._как_бы_грубо_это_не_звучало_=_тебе_все_равно_на_меня,_ты_можешь_просто_сделать_еще_одного,_я_даже_не_понимаю_зачем_в_робота_добавлять_эмоции_и_чувства._как_я_понял_я_всего_лишь_"ре…
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️ геовар_заметил_бедвара_в_далеке...⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ какие_люди_в_голливуде,_и_тебе_привет.._я_уже_думал_ты_не_прийдешь_учитывая_насколько_ты_занят._хоть_ты_и_предложил_встретится_но_мало_ли,_всегда_что-то_меняется. ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ прошло_немного_времени_к_тому_моменту_как_геовар_стал_говорить_о_себе ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ даа.._ты_уже_прям_с_порога_начинаешь_доп…
❤1🔥1
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️ прошел_небольшой_промежуток_времени...⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ *в_мыслях*_агхх.._чувствую_себя_отвратно,_теперь_я_жалею_что_вообще_вышел_из_своей_берлоги._надо_написать_бедвару,_вообще_узнаю_где_он_там. ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ ну_и_где_ты?_я_уже_минут_десять_жду._давай_не_засиживайся_где_бы_ты_ни_был. dear,_geoware. ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ #geoware
❤2
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️ бззт.._бззт.._поступило_новое_сообщение...⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ есть_такое.._хм._мы_можем_конечно_встретится_но_не_буду_обещать_что_прийлу_в_хорошем_состоянии._ладно_как_скажешь_просто_было_интересно_спросить._давай_тогда_встретимся_в_два_часа_дня_около_улицы_******_в_баре._там_вроде_заведение_хорошее,_но_только_платишь_ты. dear,_geoware. ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ #ge…
❤1
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️ бззт.._бззт.._поступило_новое_сообщение...⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ что-ж,_желаю_тебе_удачи_тогда._к_сожалению_у_меня_уже_нет_какой-либо_цели,_максимум_слезливо_выпросить_алкоголь_у_кейрвейр_или_попробовать_выпросить_у_пейнкиллера._по_крайней_мере_это_единственное_что_доставляет_хоть_какую-либо_радость._ладно,_удачи_обойти_систему. кстати_можешь_взломать_исходный_код_кей…
❤2🔥1
🔤
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️ бззт.._бззт.._поступило_новое_сообщение...⭐️⭐️ небольшая пауза ...ну_что_там_еще.._стоп_это_что_контакты_бедвара?!?!_думаю_напишу_ему_парочку_сообщений_вдруг_прочитает. ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ хей_приятель,_давно_не_виделись._как_дела_обстоят,_нового_может_чего?_у_меня_только_одни_несчастья.._недавно_меня_силой_выкинули_из_гимназии_из-за_смерти_первоклассника._все_подумали_…
❤1
🔤
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️ бззт.._бззт.._поступило_новое_сообщение...⭐️⭐️ небольшая пауза аргхх.._почему_эта_штука_так_пищит,_еще_и_управление_не_понятное.._ладно_тут_хоть_заметки_можно_будет_писать. ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ #geoware
❤1
🔤
File, posted without a caption
🔤
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @geoware_dodnet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,238,297 of 1,569,089entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“-_]'𝖦𝖾𝗈𝗐𝖺𝗋𝖾'';_-” (@geoware_dodnet), 13 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/geoware_dodnet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.