Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ᵕ̈ BADWARE

Channel

ᵕ̈ BADWARE

@Badwaredod_net

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

27subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004345519981
TypeChannel
Username@Badwaredod_net
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 8 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Badwaredod_net

Growth

23272511 August 2026 — 25 subscribers12 August 2026 — 25 subscribers18 August 2026 — 23 subscribers26 August 2026 — 25 subscribers10 September 2026 — 26 subscribers18 September 2026 — 27 subscribers11 August 202618 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 38 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22–28 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 19:3627+1
10 Sept 2026, 18:3626+1
26 Aug 2026, 07:0425+2
18 Aug 2026, 20:4323-2
12 Aug 2026, 10:2525no change
11 Aug 2026, 17:4625first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

20 reactions across 5 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5422478459823760303630.0%
custom 5424884745316114989525.0%
custom 5424929765163312320420.0%
custom 5429591557026129223420.0%
15.00%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 19:06 UTC18 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
File

❗ данный файл взят из моей почти ⬜➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ 🖥️🖥️🖥️ 🌟 . . НУ_Я_КОНЕЧНО_ПОНЯЛИ_НАМЁК. НА_САМОМ_ДЕЛЕ_У_МЕНЯ_ДАВНО_ВАЛЯЛАСЬ_ЭТА_ПЕСНЯ_В_АУДИОФАЙЛАХ. НО_ВОТ_ТОЛЬКО_К_ВАШЕМУ_СВЕДЕНИЮ_Я_ТАНЦЕВАТЬ_ОСОБО_НЕ_УМЕЕМ! 😈 А_ПРО_ДРУГОЕ_Я_ПРОМОЛЧИМ. ПРАВДУ_ВСЕГДА_ЗАМАЛКИВАЮТ)) 💭💭💭💭💭💭

custom 54248847453161149891

10 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC20 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

⬜➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ 🖥️🖥️🖥️ 🌟 ВСЕМ_ПРИВЕТ! ЧТОЖ_ВЧЕРА_Я_БЫЛИ_ЗАНЯТЫ_ТЕМ_ЧТО_ВСТРЕТИЛИСЬ_С_ГЕОВЕЕРОМ_ОДНИМ_ИЗ_СВОИХ_БАЛВАНОК_ЗНАКОМЫХ. НАШ_ДИАЛОГ_ПРОШЁЛ_НЕ_ОЧЕНЬ_ГЛАДКО_НО_БОЛЕЕ_МЕНЕЕ. ТОЛЬКО_СЕЙЧАС_ЗАМЕТИЛ_ЧТО_ТОТ_УДАЛИЛ_СВОЙ_КАНАЛ! ХММ . . . НАДЕЮСЬ_ЧТО_ОН_ПРОСТО_ПОНЯЛ_ЧТО_НУЖНО_ЗАНЯТЬСЯ_СВОИМ_СОСТОЯНИЕМ_И_ДЕЛАМИ_ПОВАЖНЕЕ 🖥️ Я_В_СВОЮ_ОЧЕРЕДЬ_НЕ_СИЖУ_НА_МЕСТЕ_И_ПРИСМАТРИВАЮ_СЕБЕ_КОЕ_ЧТО. НО_ЭТО_ПОКА_СЕКРЕТ_ДЛЯ_ВАС. НЕ_УВ

custom 54249297651633123202custom 54224784598237603031custom 54248847453161149891

9 Aug 2026, 20:11 UTC21 viewsread 11 August 2026

⬜➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ 🖥️🖥️🖥️ ⬜*слова геовеера про ресур были в какой-то степени правда, но очевидно что бедвеер не собирались об этом говорить так прямо. они немного занервнечали от состояния робота. вирус вспомнили почему они особо не хотели видеться со своими 'пешками'... * ⬜🖥️ — ЭТО_НЕ_ТАК_ЛЕГКО_КАК_ТЫ_СЧИТАЕШЬ. НА_ДАННЫЙ_МОМЕНТ_МНЕ_СЛОЖНЕЕ_ЗАРАЖАТЬ_ТЕХНИКУ_В_НИЖНЕМ_ГОРОДЕ. ТУТ_ТЫ_ХЕР_НАЙДЁШЬ_РОБО-ОБОЛОЧКУ. А_ЕСЛИ_СОЗДАВАТЬ_С

9 Aug 2026, 18:10 UTC19 viewsread 11 August 2026

⬜➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ 🖥️🖥️🖥️ ⬜*робот внимательно слушали рассказ о крайне трудной жизни геовеера. но с каждым предложением у бедвеера на экране улыбка становилась все меньше и меньше пока и вовсе не исчезла. тот факт что их балванка хочет наложить на себя руки сильно волновало тех. вирус не мог позволить произойти этому* ⬜🖥️ — ОУ. ЭТО_ЗВУЧИТ_УЖАСНО_ГЕОВЕЕР. ДАЖЕ_НЕ_МОГУ_ПРЕДСТАВЬ_КАК_ЭТО_ВСЁ_СВАЛИЛОСЬ_НА_ТЕБЯ . . . ЗНАЕШЬ_У_МЕНЯ

9 Aug 2026, 11:39 UTC19 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026

⬜➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ 🖥️🖥️🖥️ ⬜*Бедвеер в свою очередь уже напровлялись в назначеное место, осматривая местность вокруг. робот были бы только рады по возможности опросить геовеер о разном.. о прошлом, о том граждане поживают вообще, а самое о их новых технологиях. в гимназии точно должны быть ноутбуки, телевизоры и все такое* ⬜*уже подойдя к бару вирус увидели знакомый экранчик и они сразу оживились. подойдя к знакомому робот сра

custom 542959155702612922321custom 54224784598237603031custom 54249297651633123201

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Badwaredod_net. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ᵕ̈ BADWARE” (@Badwaredod_net), 27 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Badwaredod_net.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.