Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Georgy.Design ❇️

Channel

Georgy.Design ❇️

@georgydesign

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

43subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001270915719
TypeChannel
Username@georgydesign
DescriptionDesigner and developer 👨🏻‍💻 — Group chat @georgychat — Business site georgy.design — Personal site geor.gy — Для русскоговорящих @georgystories
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/georgydesign

Growth

437 August 2026 — 43 subscribers10 August 2026 — 43 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 42–44 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 16:3043no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:1843first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 4 December 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.3%
avg views ÷ 43 subscribers
Avg views / post
7.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held18 (4 December 202430 July 2026)
Views total7
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
148
Videos
30
Links
163

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
28s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 4 December 2024 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Jan 2026, 18:45 UTC64 views0 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @georgystories

Также от комьюнити менеджера Webflow я услышал, что, вроде как, в очень скором времени должны добавить изменение глобальных настроек (по умолчанию) в компонентах в режиме Edit. Это решит огромное неудобство, так как, чтобы клиентам глобальном менять компоненты, надо переходить в режим Design. Соответственно, это может привести к самого разным проблем, например случайно удалить элемент клиент/редактор/т.д. может или

28 Jan 2026, 18:45 UTC52 views0 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @georgystoriesPhoto

Webflow тотально обновили Conditional Visibility 🎮 Наконец-то название себя оправдывает и действительно можно настроить разные условия отображения контента. Более того возможно добавлять несколько разных сочетаний (если/или) — плюс в компонентах также будет тогл, который можно будет подвязать с этой настройке. Также Webflow будет предлагать разную конфигурацию в зависимости от настроек в вашей CMS коллекции, но мо

22 Oct 2025, 12:06 UTC59 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @georgystoriesPhoto

Обновление программы создателей шаблонов в Webflow 🆕 🛍 Повышенная комиссия Теперь платят 95% за продажу всех платных шаблонов на Webflow Marketplace. 🌐 Продажа где угодно Наконец-то можно продавать шаблоны не только на Webflow Marketplace, а вообще где угодно, достаточно сгенерировать ссылку, по сути всё почти в один клик происходит. Сами указываете цены и делаете платёжки. Дополнительная информация: 🔗 https://

25 Jul 2025, 14:23 UTC43 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @madcomedyVideo

Video, posted without a caption

24 Jul 2025, 18:01 UTC57 viewsread 10 August 2026

Real-time collaboration coming to Webflow in following weeks! 💃 https://webflow.com/blog/real-time-collaboration

6 Apr 2025, 11:32 UTC115 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Webflow update • Custom code preview directly in Webflow 🐰 You will be able to see actual functioning GSAP, Finsweet, and other custom code right in Webflow Designer via “Preview” feature. The update is still in beta-release, so it’ll take some time to rollout on all users.

🔥2

21 Feb 2025, 15:30 UTC72 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @georgystories

Наткнулся сегодня на видео о Шэньчжэне — кремниевой долине Китая. ▶️ https://youtu.be/VItBlmlWE4U Когда-то я жил и мне там весьма нравилось. Хотя терпеть не мог жару — также было тяжко ездить на велосипеде из-за этой высокой температуры, и из-за относительных «наклонов» города. Намного реже катался чем до этого. Планирую туда вернуться на какое-то время, место действительно для тех кто любит технологии, ультра сов

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @georgydesign. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 975,467 of 1,566,395entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Georgy.Design ❇️” (@georgydesign), 43 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/georgydesign.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.