Channel
@geopolitics_M
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
168subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001935651041 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @geopolitics_M |
| Description | Размышления о геополитике. Автор канала - Рябинин Евгений Вадимович , кандидат политических наук, доцент кафедры истории и политологии Мариупольского государственного университета имени А.И.Куинджи |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/geopolitics_M |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:31 | 168 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:48 | 168 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (4 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 745 |
| Reactions total | 31 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
31 reactions across 7 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 11 | 35.5% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 25.8% | |
| 🏆 | 3 | 9.68% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 6.45% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 6.45% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 3.23% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 3.23% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 3.23% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 3.23% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 3.23% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
В то время как Вучич принимает в Белграде украинское отребье, сто общественных деятелей подписали протестную петицию в связи с прибытием зеленского в Сербию. Текст их заявления: "Мы, подписанные, выражаем протест против приглашения Владимира Зеленского с официальным визитом в Сербию. Помимо того, что срок его полномочий на посту президента бывшей Украины истек более двух лет назад, мы считаем Зеленского, как предс…
👍3💔1
Photo, posted without a caption
Главное - пойти правильным путем, но об этом узнаешь в самом конце! Всем хорошего и плодотворного дня!)
💯4👍3🕊1🤝1🫡1
Наш сербский друг Ненад Станкович о визите зеленского
💯1
Продолжение. Кручу, верчу, обмануть хочу. Именно так себя ведет президент Сербии Вучич. В то время как русский и сербский народы налаживают и укрепляют отношения при помощи народной дипломатии, Вучич делает все, чтобы отвести Сербию подальше от России. На последнем саммите, который был проведен в Киеве, Вучич не подписал итоговую декларацию и Сербия до сих пор не ввела санкции против России. Казалось бы, какой хороши…
💯4
Продолжение. Реанимировать интерес. На фоне уменьшения военной поддержки Украины и угасания интереса к ней, коллективный Запад пытается поддерживать и первый и второй аспекты на плаву. В начале 2024 года состоялся первый крупный саммит «Украина – Юго-Восточная Европа». В этом году в Киеве был проведен четвертый. Первый саммит, состоявшийся в Албании, был достаточно продуктивным: Украина договорилась с Боснией и Гер…
Продолжение Военная помощь от Западных Балкан. С начала СВО страны Западных Балкан активно участвовали в обеспечении Украины как вооружением, так и гуманитарной помощью. Так, Болгария весной 2022 года обеспечивала до трети потребностей ВСУ в боеприпасах через фирмы-посредники, поставляла до 40% потребностей Украины в дизельном топливе. Недавно Болгария вышла из коалиции желающих. Казалось бы, как прекрасно, что поли…
Сербия, открой окно! К вопросу о геополитической проституции Вучича. Конфликт между Россией и Украиной, который, по некоторым прогнозам, должен был завершиться в течение нескольких месяцев, отмерил четвертый год. Это стало возможным только благодаря финансовой, военной и дипломатической поддержке Украины странами НАТО и их сателлитами. В последнее время ВСУ испытывают серьезную нехватку вооружений, особенно снарядов…
"Прекрасный" вечер в Европе! Наблюдаем дальше...
🏆3❤2
Чем для вас является кофе?
The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Давайте немного отвлечемся от всемирного хаоса и поговорим о…кофе. Кофе дорожает также, как и нефть, но причины немного другие нежели региональные конфликты. Стоимость робусты в прошлом месяце выросла на 9,1% по сравнению с июнем и достигла $4,07 за 1 кг. Арабика подорожала еще сильнее — на 16,5% за месяц, до $7,91 за 1 кг. Частично в этом виновато природное явление Эль-Ниньо, которое уже сказывается на производстве…
6 августа 1945 года мир узнал, что такое на деле ядерное оружие. Утром американский бомбардировщик Enola Gay сбросил на Хиросиму атомную бомбу "Малыш". "Ничего, это легко смывается водой" — так ответил президент Трумэн Оппенгеймеру, когда тот рассказал, что после бомбардировок японских городов он и его коллеги ощущают "кровь на своих руках". За почти 80 лет ни один американский президент так и не принес извинений за …
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @geopolitics_M. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Чем для вас является кофе?
The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Злой Макиавелли” (@geopolitics_M), 168 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/geopolitics_M.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.