3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 626–627 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 04:58
626
-1
6 Aug 2026, 17:33
627
no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:34
627
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 18 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.5%
avg views ÷ 626 subscribers
Avg views / post
78.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
1.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026
Posts held
16 (18 December 2025 – 29 July 2026)
Views total
78
Reactions total
1
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Aug 2026, 17:33 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
89 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
71
79.8%
👍
11
12.4%
👎
2
2.25%
😇
2
2.25%
🤣
2
2.25%
👏
1
1.12%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 89reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 18 December 2025 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌍✨ فراخوان همکاری با نشریه علمی و پرافتخار آوای زمین ✨🌍
دوست داری بخشی از یک تیم خلاق، پویا و پرانرژی باشی؟ 😍
نشریه آوای زمین، به صاحبامتیازی انجمن علمی زمینشناسی دانشگاه یزد و بهعنوان یکی از پرافتخارترین نشریات علمی دانشجویی، برای انتشار شمارههای جدید خودش از بین دانشجویان علاقهمند دعوت به همکاری میکنه. 🎧📚
🔹 سمتهای موردنیاز:
✍️ نویسندگی
🎙️ گویندگی
🎨 گرافیست
😂 طنزنویس
📰 ویراستار ادبی و علمی
🖌️ کاریکاتوریست
ای…
⭕️ اطلاعیه ترم تابستان ۱۴۰۵ برای دانشجویان دانشگاه یزد متقاضیان میهمانی در سایر دانشگاهها
▫️ به اطلاع دانشجویان گرامی دانشگاه یزد میرساند، در صورت تأیید دانشکده مربوطه، امکان اخذ دروس در ترم تابستان ۱۴۰۵ بهصورت میهمان در دانشگاههای مورد تأیید فراهم است. اخذ دروس صرفاً با رعایت کلیه ضوابط آموزشی، از جمله پیشنیازها، همنیازها و سایر شرایط و مقررات مندرج در فایل پیوست، امکانپذیر خواهد بود.
🔹 اینستاگرام انجمن علم…
🌎 انجمن علمی زمینشناسی دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی با همکاری انجمن علمی زمینشناسی دانشگاه یزد و جمعی از برترین انجمن های علمی کشور برگزار میکند؛
🇮🇷 پویش ملی مرهمِ ایران، ایران را از نو باهم میسازیم
💠 محورهای پویش:
🔹️ راههای بازسازی و نوسازی پدیدههای زمینشناسی (طبیعی، ساختگی) آسیبدیده پس از جنگ
🔹️راهکارهای کاهش و احیای آسیبهای جنگی بر روی زمین و محیطزیست
🔹️راهکارهای زدودن آلودگیها از آب، خاک، هوا و زیستگاههای گ…
🌎 انجمن علمی زمینشناسی دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی با همکاری جمعی از برترین انجمن های علمی کشور به مناسبت روز جهانی محیطزیست و روز جهانی مقابله با بیابانزایی برگزار میکند؛
☘️ مسابقه ملی ایدههای سبز زمین☘️
✨️ در راستای ترویج فرهنگ محافظت از محیطزیست و گسترش فضاهای سبز و جلوگیری از بیابانزایی
📌خرداد الی تیر ۱۴۰۵
🔹️یک چالش محیطزیستی ارائه بده
🔹️برای حل و رفع اون یک راهکار پیشنهاد بده
🔹️ایده برتر و برنده شو
🏆 به ه…
📌۲۸امین دوره انتخابات انجمن های علمی دانشجویی دانشگاه یزد
🔖اسامی کاندیداهای انجمن علمی زمین شناسی
📆تاریخ برگزاری انتخابات: ۹ الی ۱۹ خرداد ماه
📍محل برگزاری: سامانه گلستان
⚙️ پردازش: ۱۵۱۷۰
🆔 @geology_yazd
به نام نامیِ ایران
«چو ایران نباشد تن من مباد / بدین بوم و بر زنده یک تن مباد»
بیانیه جمعی از دانشجویان رشته زمینشناسی دانشگاه یزد
با سلام و احترام محضر اساتید گرانقدر و همدانشگاهیهای گرامی،
پیرو دغدغههای بهحق و مطالبات مکرر دانشجویان رشته زمینشناسی دانشگاه یزد، در راستای حفظ کیفیت آموزش و احقاق حقوق تحصیلی خود، ما جمعی از دانشجویان این رشته خواستار توقف روند فعلی آموزش مجازی و بازگشت به آموزش حضوری هستیم.
ص…
❇️اطلاعیه ترمیم(حذف و اضافه) نیمسال دوم ۰۵-۱۴۰۴
🗓شنبه و یکشنبه، ۲ و ۳ اسفندماه ۱۴۰۴
⏳مهلت: ۲۴ ساعت پس از شروع زمان مشخص شده ترمیم برای هر فرد
➖تعداد حذف درس مجاز:
🔅کارشناسی: ۴ درس
🔅کارشناسی ارشد: ۴ درس
➕تعداد اضافه نموندن درس مجاز:
🔅کارشناسی: ۶ درس
🔅کارشناسی ارشد: ۴ درس
‼️بررسی و رعایت مسائل پیشنیازی، همنیازی و حد نصاب مشروطی بر عهده خود دانشجو میباشد و بعد از ترمیم تمامی این موارد توسط آموزش چک میشود و در …
🍁 فصلنامه پاییز «آوای زمین» منتشر شد!
📅 سال دهم | شماره بیستونهم | پاییز ۱۴۰۴
🏛 صاحبامتیاز: انجمن علمی زمینشناسی دانشگاه یزد
🎓 استاد مشاور: دکتر مهناز خدامی
🖋 مدیرمسئول: علی کمالی
📝 سردبیر: زهرا اخوان
🎨 صفحهآرا و طراح: علی کمالی
✍️ هیئت تحریریه:
زهرا اخوان، معصومه دهقان، سوگند سماک، محدثه کاظمی، علی کمالی
🛠 ویراستاران:
زهرا اخوان، ندا داستان، معصومه دهقان، فاطمه فودازی، مانا کریمی، محدثه کاظمی، علی کمالی، زهر…
❤8👏1
Signed mhdse kazemi
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @geology_yazd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 171,394 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@geology_yazd named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@beti_azd1024 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Geology_yazduni” (@geology_yazd), 626 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/geology_yazd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
