Growth
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 19 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 86.7%
- avg views ÷ 23 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 19.9
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 7.53%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 17
- Videos
- 8
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 45m 15s
- Average length
- 6m 28s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
25 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 September 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
27 Sept 2026, 16:10 UTC30 views1 reactionsread 28 September 2026 Video
🧪 جت گروتینگ | قسمت دوم
در ادامه آشنایی با روش Jet Grouting، در این ویدئو بخش دیگری از فرآیند اجرا، عملکرد تجهیزات و نکات عملی این روش بهسازی خاک را مشاهده میکنیم.
این توضیحات در جریان بازدید علمی دانشجویان دانشگاه صنعتی شریف از پروژه شرکت بسپار پی ایرانیان و توسط آقای دکتر شاکری ارائه شده است.
جت گروتینگ یکی از روشهای مؤثر در بهسازی خاک است که با استفاده از تزریق پرفشار دوغاب، باعث بهبود مشخصات مهندسی خاک و ایجاد …
👍1
27 Sept 2026, 08:36 UTC28 views2 reactionsread 28 September 2026 Video
🧪 جت گروتینگ (Jet Grouting) | قسمت اول
در این ویدئو، نحوه کار دستگاه جت گروتینگ و فرآیند اجرای تزریق پرفشار را میبینیم؛ روشی که با تزریق دوغاب با فشار بالا، ساختار خاک را برهم زده و با اختلاط خاک و دوغاب، ستونهای بهسازیشده در زمین ایجاد میکند.
📌 در قسمت اول، تمرکز روی دستگاه، نحوه عملکرد و فرآیند کلی اجرا است.
این توضیحات توسط آقای دکتر شاکری در جریان یک بازدید علمی از پروژه شرکت بسپار پی ایرانیان ارائه شده است؛ …
👍2
27 Sept 2026, 08:30 UTC28 views2 reactionsread 28 September 2026 File
📗 کتاب حل المسائل
#مکانیک_خاک
#کریگ (Criag)
ویرایش هفتم
(زبان اصلی)
ژئولرن | مرجع تخصصی آموزش ژئوتکنیک
@geolearn_academy
👍2
26 Sept 2026, 05:02 UTC27 views2 reactionsread 28 September 2026 Photo
تزریق پرفشار (Jet Grouting)؛ روشی مؤثر برای بهسازی خاک
در روش جت گروتینگ، دوغاب سیمان با فشار بسیار بالا از نازل خارج شده و با تخریب ساختار خاک و اختلاط همزمان با آن، یک توده مقاوم خاک–سیمان (Soil-Cement) ایجاد میکند.
🔹 روند اجرا بهطور خلاصه:
حفاری تا عمق طرح → شروع تزریق از پایین → چرخش و بالا کشیدن راد → تشکیل ستون خاک–سیمان
🔹 مهمترین کاربردها:
• افزایش ظرفیت باربری خاک
• کاهش نشست
• کاهش نفوذپذیری و ایجاد آببن…
❤1👌1
25 Sept 2026, 17:20 UTC24 views1 reactionsread 28 September 2026 File
🗃#سورس
📈گزارش کار آزمایشگاه مکانیک خاک
📝درس #آزمایشگاه_مکانیک_خاک
🎓 #دانشگاه_صنعتی_شریف
ژئولرن | مرجع تخصصی آموزش ژئوتکنیک
@geolearn_academy
🔥1
25 Sept 2026, 17:08 UTC23 views2 reactionsread 28 September 2026 File
📆جزوه کامل مکانیک خاک
📝درس #مکانیک_خاک
👨🏫استاد #پاک
📍#دانشگاه_صنعتی_شریف
ژئولرن | مرجع تخصصی آموزش ژئوتکنیک
@geolearn_academy
🔥1🙏1
25 Sept 2026, 17:05 UTC22 views2 reactionsread 28 September 2026 File
📆جزوه کامل مهندسی پی
📝درس #مهندسی_پی
👨🏫 استاد #پاک
📰مناسب برای #چاپ
📍#دانشگاه_صنعتی_شریف
ژئولرن | مرجع تخصصی آموزش ژئوتکنیک
@geolearn_academy
❤1🙏1
25 Sept 2026, 16:48 UTC20 views2 reactionsread 28 September 2026 Photo
📌 در چه شرایطی نیاز به آزمایش خاک نمیباشد؟
مطابق بند 7-2-2-1 مبحث هفت مقررات ملی ساختمان، در صورتی که تمام شرایط زیر همزمان برقرار باشند، انجام عملیات گمانهزنی الزامی نیست و جمعآوری اطلاعات و بازدید محلی میتواند کفایت کند:
✅ دادههای کافی از محدوده موردنظر و زمینهای با سازند زمینشناسی مشابه در دسترس باشد.
✅ ساختمان با اهمیت کم یا متوسط و حداکثر 4 طبقه باشد.
✅ مساحت اشغال ساختمان کمتر از 300 مترمربع باشد.
✅ میز…
❤2
25 Sept 2026, 16:31 UTC18 views2 reactionsread 28 September 2026 Photo
چسبندگی خاک یا Cohesion (c) یکی از مؤلفههای اصلی مقاومت برشی خاک است و نقش مهمی در رفتار خاکهای رسی دارد.
در تحلیلهای ژئوتکنیکی، مقدار چسبندگی مستقیماً در بررسی پایداری گود، شیروانیها، ظرفیت باربری پی و گسیختگی برشی خاک اثرگذار است.
📌 آکادمی ژئولرن | مرجع تخصصی آموزش ژئوتکنیک
@geolearn_academy
❤2
23 Sept 2026, 14:56 UTC19 views2 reactionsread 28 September 2026 یک تناقض عجیب در گودبرداریها وجود دارد؛ گاهی گودهای کمعمق، خطرناکتر از چیزی هستند که تصور میکنیم!
در نگاه اول شاید تصور کنیم هرچه عمق گود بیشتر باشد، احتمال ریزش هم بیشتر است. از نظر مهندسی، این تصور تا حدی درست است؛ چراکه با افزایش عمق گود، نیروهای جانبی خاک، تغییرشکلها و حساسیت سیستم پایدارسازی افزایش پیدا میکند و نیاز به طراحی دقیقتر و کنترلهای اجرایی بیشتری وجود دارد.
اما تجربه چندین ساله در اجرای پروژه…
❤1👍1
23 Sept 2026, 14:53 UTC17 views2 reactionsread 28 September 2026 Photo
⛏️ یک تناقض عجیب در گودبرداریها؛ چرا آمار ریزش گود در گودهای کم عمق بیشتر است؟! ⚠️
از نظر مهندسی، با افزایش عمق گود، فشار جانبی خاک و حساسیت پروژه بیشتر میشود؛ اما در عمل بسیاری از مشکلات در گودهایی اتفاق میافتد که به دلیل عمق کم، دستکم گرفته شدهاند.
گاهی تصور میشود:
❌ «این گود که عمیق نیست، خطری ندارد!»
اما خطر گود فقط به عمق وابسته نیست. 🌍
عواملی مثل:
⛰️ کیفیت خاک
💧 آب زیرزمینی
🏢 فاصله ساختمان مجاور
⬇️ سر…
❤1👌1
21 Sept 2026, 08:51 UTC19 views2 reactionsread 28 September 2026 File
راهنمای طراحی دیوارهای حائل (نشریه شماره ۳۰۸)
📚 آکادمی ژئولرن | مرجع تخصصی آموزش ژئوتکنیک
✅ @geolearn_academy
❤1👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @geolearn_academy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“آکادمی ژئولرن | مرجع تخصصی آموزش ژئوتکنیک” (@geolearn_academy), 23 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/geolearn_academy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.