Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Genusov : Masks Off 🎭

Channel

Genusov : Masks Off 🎭

@genusovb

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

200subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001693642667
TypeChannel
Username@genusovb
DescriptionBoris Genusov
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/genusovb

Growth

2007 Aug 2026, 10:18 — 200 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 11:32 — 200 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 10:188 Aug 2026, 11:32
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 199–201 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 11:32200no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:18200first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 8 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
85.0%
avg views ÷ 200 subscribers
Avg views / post
170
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held17 (8 February 20263 August 2026)
Views total1,190
Reactions total41
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 11:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
25
Videos
9
Links
8

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 05s
Average length
1m 05s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

124 reactions across 12 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5040.3%
🔥2721.8%
👍1512.1%
💯1411.3%
🏆32.42%
🙏32.42%
🍾21.61%
👏21.61%
💔21.61%
🤝21.61%
🥰21.61%
❤‍🔥10.806%
👻10.806%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 124reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 8 February 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 04:53 UTC119 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сказка от-кутюр. @izmenisoznaniecommunity 📸 credits to @aptemd

5🔥3🍾2

30 Jul 2026, 08:32 UTC139 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня международный день дружбы. Говорят, я умею дружить. Есть ли секрет? Наверное, нет. Просто : !цените !интересуйтесь !вовлекайтесь !поддерживайте !проводите время вместе, как приятное, так и не очень Всех своих друзей очень 💖

15

26 Jul 2026, 20:37 UTC187 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Zivert. Первый акустический концерт в ее сольной карьере 🎶 На мой взгляд, лучший российский артист последних 10 лет. Что думаете?

🔥8👍1

19 Jul 2026, 14:37 UTC245 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Выиграет ЧМ

  1. Испания43%
  2. Аргентина57%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Jul 2026, 14:37 UTC181 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🎾Теперь можно и к финалу ЧМ готовиться. Кто за кого?

🔥3

19 Jul 2026, 08:40 UTC167 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🍒Так получилось, что в моем очень близком окружении много людей, развивающих свой бизнес через маркетплэйсы. По роду своей деятельности последние 15 лет тоже тесно сотрудничаю и веду бизнес с торговыми площадками, общаюсь с их руководителями, как в России, так и в 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇹🇷🇳🇱🇩🇪. Не важно где, всех этих людей отличает высочайшая скорость принятия стратегических решений, не говоря уже о невероятных управленческих спосо

👍2💔2

16 Jul 2026, 11:04 UTC160 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Именно таким и был Роберто Баджо. Мой любимый футболист. ❤️ В 94м году, я первый раз смотрел все матчи чемпионата мира 🌎 🏆(кстати, тоже проходивший в Америке), и был заворожен его лидерскими качествами и игрой. В финале он не забил пенальти в послематчевой серии. К тому моменту Барези и Массаро также не смогли реализовать одиннадцатиметровый , но вину за поражение пресса 🗞️ 📺 возложила на Баджо. Такова доля лиде

4👍2💯2🔥1

15 Jul 2026, 21:22 UTC160 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Лидер - это не тот, кто болтает,а тот , кто тащит в трудную минуту, своим примером показывает всем , как надо делать, и делает это регулярно . 🇦🇷🔟 Месси - не просто лучший игрок Мира, он настоящий лидер.

💯6🔥4👍3👏2❤‍🔥1

12 May 2026, 16:19 UTC393 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

💾Кстати, пока не забыл… в этот раз с нами "кайфовала" еще и 🥇олимпийская чемпионка Рио : Елена Веснина (в прошлый раз была Екатерина Макарова, с которой мне удалось поработать в 2013 году в Wilson). Ее история чуть отличается от Дениса, но схожесть в том, что после завершения игровой карьеры 🎾Елена не бросила теннис, а нашла себя в нем и делает все для продвижения этого вида спорта в массы. У нее свой подкаст🎙️, он

11🔥4🏆3

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @genusovb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Jul 2026, 14:37 UTCFinal Results30 voters

Выиграет ЧМ

  1. Испания43%
  2. Аргентина57%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11 Apr 2026, 03:50 UTCAnonymous Poll33 voters

Так кто победит?

  1. Орбан70%
  2. Мадьяр30%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 8 February 2026 to 3 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Genusov : Masks Off 🎭” (@genusovb), 200 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/genusovb.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.