GF/BF Chahie?

Channel
General Science With Neeraj Sir
@general_science_with_neeraj_Sir
On this record: Topic · Growth · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
50,385subscribers
-3,255 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001728448445 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @general_science_with_neeraj_Sir |
| Description | 𝐁𝐞𝐬𝐭 𝐄𝐝𝐮𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐂𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐥 𝐎𝐧 𝐓𝐞𝐥𝐞𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐦 𝐅𝐨𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐨𝐟 𝐀𝐥𝐥 𝐄𝐱𝐚𝐦 यहाँ आपको प्रत्येक दिन भौतिक,रसायन,जीव विज्ञान और सामान्य विज्ञान पर सभी महत्वपूर्ण क्विज़ अपडेट |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 55 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/general_science_with_neeraj_Sir |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 06:58 | 50,385 | -34 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 01:31 | 50,419 | -52 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 02:50 | 50,471 | -29 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 04:57 | 50,500 | -49 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 06:25 | 50,549 | -23 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 06:00 | 50,572 | -30 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 02:59 | 50,602 | -29 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 03:58 | 50,631 | -39 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 07:08 | 50,670 | -55 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 06:36 | 50,725 | -32 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 06:16 | 50,757 | -35 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 03:31 | 50,792 | -34 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 05:29 | 50,826 | -46 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 03:31 | 50,872 | -27 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 00:56 | 50,899 | -42 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 21:30 | 50,941 | -52 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 20:27 | 50,993 | -51 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 17:05 | 51,044 | -53 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 16:16 | 51,097 | -36 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 13:16 | 51,133 | first reading |
Reaction mix
1,499 reactions across 49 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,018 | 67.9% | |
| 👍 | 391 | 26.1% | |
| 🔥 | 18 | 1.20% | |
| 👏 | 16 | 1.07% | |
| 🥰 | 11 | 0.734% | |
| 😁 | 9 | 0.6% | |
| 🫡 | 9 | 0.6% | |
| 👎 | 6 | 0.4% | |
| 🦄 | 5 | 0.334% | |
| 🤓 | 4 | 0.267% | |
| 🏆 | 2 | 0.133% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 0.133% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 0.133% | |
| 🤬 | 2 | 0.133% | |
| 🖕 | 1 | 0.067% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.067% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.067% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 0.067% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 52 of the 195 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,499 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 195 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2024 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
सिर्फ 10 सीट खाली हैं जल्दी जुडे़ अंतिम मौका है👆👆
क्या आप खान सर {पटना} के ग्रुप मे शामिल होना चाहते हैं?
Aap kya ho ?
अंतिम अवसर सिर्फ 15 सीटे ख़ाली है फटाफट जुड़े ,फिर मत बोलना कि हम रह गए👆👆इसीलिए शीघ्र अतिशीघ्र अपने राज्य को चुनिए एवं फ्री में स्टडी मटेरियल प्राप्त कीजिए
🇮🇳 आप किस राज्य से हैं❓ 📲 कृपया विकल्प चुनिए ✔️ 📲 फ्री स्टडी़ मटेरियल :- प्रतियोगी परीक्षाओं के लिए सिर्फ एक क्लिक करने पर❗️
Aap kya ho ?
अंतिम अवसर सिर्फ 15 सीटे ख़ाली है फटाफट जुड़े ,फिर मत बोलना कि हम रह गए👆👆इसीलिए शीघ्र अतिशीघ्र अपने राज्य को चुनिए एवं फ्री में स्टडी मटेरियल प्राप्त कीजिए
🇮🇳 आप किस राज्य से हैं❓ 📲 कृपया विकल्प चुनिए ✔️ 📲 फ्री स्टडी़ मटेरियल :- प्रतियोगी परीक्षाओं के लिए सिर्फ एक क्लिक करने पर❗️
Aap kya ho ?
अंतिम अवसर सिर्फ 15 सीटे ख़ाली है फटाफट जुड़े ,फिर मत बोलना कि हम रह गए👆👆इसीलिए शीघ्र अतिशीघ्र अपने राज्य को चुनिए एवं फ्री में स्टडी मटेरियल प्राप्त कीजिए
🇮🇳 आप किस राज्य से हैं❓ 📲 कृपया विकल्प चुनिए ✔️ 📲 फ्री स्टडी़ मटेरियल :- प्रतियोगी परीक्षाओं के लिए सिर्फ एक क्लिक करने पर❗️
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @general_science_with_neeraj_Sir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@mansh_9520 · 737#1
@tg_gurukul · 4,992#2
@unfilteredRishii · 4,906#3
@studywithRahulSinha · 56,236#4
@NadeemSir_Testbook · 6,210#5
@MadChemClassesLive · 6,123#6
@UK_UP_JUDICIARY_GK_UKPSC_UKSSSC · 4,893#7
@IfasChemistry · 9,634#8
@Kalam_PsiTestSeries · 7,507#9
@whatyoudonotknow · 2,027#10
@gsmaster1973 · 40,016#11
@mathsmaharajutkarsh · 29,617#12
@inspire_ras_academy · 1,557#13
@Bhatiaashramanimalattendant · 714#14
@vivekguptasir · 2,569#15
@Bpsc_Resolution_PDFs · 2,139#16
@unfilteredrishiiNotes · 2,185#17
@CRYPTO_MINING_PROJECTS1 · 66#18
@hindivyakaranguru · 14,905#19
@CAREERCOACHINGPONT · 8,860#20
@RSSB_Alok_Raj · 1#21
@IN999_1MINPREDICTION · 823#22
@EduSandhanTestSeries · 28,229#23
@cryptoshyamcs · 16,348#24
@bpscconceptwallah · 50,621#25
@Reasoning_By_Sandeep_Sirr · 36,127#26
@ElvishArmyOfficial1 · 3,121#27
@ItalianLanguageLearning · 3,968#28
@blumcrypto · 12,813,201#29
@Pawan_Rao_Sir_Practice_2025 · 18,886#30
@Math_Reasoning_Quiz_Mock_Test · 4,298 (as read 24 August 2026)#31
@Born_For_Gamers · 1,844#32
@dogs · 6,451,094#33
@notcoin · 7,862,365#34
@venomfc24 · 865#35
@Genbinesia · 9,805#36
@chemical_reactions · 6,349#37
@womens_t20_blast_session · 13,564#38
@hamster_kombat · 19,609,006#39
@rajasthan_education_newss · 22,534#40
@Everydaywealthupdate · 36,778#41
@Baprofessionals · 12,368#42
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@studywithRahulSinha · 56,236
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 27 August 2026
@golden_rules_by_Neetu_Singh · 109,731
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“General Science With Neeraj Sir” (@general_science_with_neeraj_Sir), 50,385 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/general_science_with_neeraj_Sir.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.