Вот уже 20 лет гендиры российских компаний развивают бизнес вместе с нами.
3,5 тысячи кейсов от успешных руководителей, экспертная поддержка, закрытые форумы, курсы и вебинары.
📲 Мы в MAX https://max.ru/gd_ru
Реклама: @polarightt
Created
Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
25 measurements spanning 91 days, net -197. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,474–8,731 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 15:11
8,504
-3
3 Nov 2026, 23:51
8,507
-8
31 Oct 2026, 17:36
8,515
-3
28 Oct 2026, 17:41
8,518
-10
25 Oct 2026, 18:06
8,528
-6
22 Oct 2026, 12:36
8,534
-8
19 Oct 2026, 03:09
8,542
-3
16 Oct 2026, 04:21
8,545
-8
12 Oct 2026, 23:39
8,553
-5
6 Oct 2026, 07:35
8,558
-20
29 Sept 2026, 09:57
8,578
-27
19 Sept 2026, 08:57
8,605
-4
14 Sept 2026, 22:01
8,609
-9
10 Sept 2026, 22:16
8,618
-1
6 Sept 2026, 01:38
8,619
-9
2 Sept 2026, 00:07
8,628
-7
29 Aug 2026, 15:03
8,635
-4
26 Aug 2026, 11:23
8,639
-4
23 Aug 2026, 05:33
8,643
-17
19 Aug 2026, 12:51
8,660
first reading
Engagement
56 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.14%
avg views ÷ 8,504 subscribers
Avg views / post
608
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.479%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 56 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026
Posts held
56 (21 July 2026 – 2 November 2026)
Views total
5,468
Reactions total
23
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 11:20 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,070
Videos
≈48
Links
≈1,970
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
125 reactions across 36 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
43
34.4%
👍
29
23.2%
🔥
17
13.6%
👌
6
4.80%
✍
5
4.00%
💯
5
4.00%
🏆
3
2.40%
👏
3
2.40%
🙏
3
2.40%
⚡
2
1.60%
🤓
2
1.60%
🥰
2
1.60%
custom 5449627450612928039
1
0.8%
❤🔥
1
0.8%
😁
1
0.8%
🤔
1
0.8%
🤝
1
0.8%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 56 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 125 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 2 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
1.79%
1 of 56 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
390
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
551
over 55 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2SDnje6vTCo
1
24 August 2026
24 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 2 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 9 posts held from the last 30 days (33.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Почему фильтры лежат у ворот, а бамперы – на верхних полках? Разбираем FMR-анализ
Как вы думаете, что важнее для склада: стоимость товара или частота, с которой за ним ходит кладовщик? Часто мы фокусируемся на деньгах (ABC-анализ), но забываем про физику процессов. Тут на помощь приходит FMR-анализ (Fastest, Medium, Rare) – анализ ассортимента по частоте обращений.
Показатель рассчитывают как коэффициент частоты об…
На какие soft skills я смотрю у руководителя при подборе или повышении: опыт сооснователя Ushatava
✔️ Человечность. Руководитель не может относиться к людям только как к ресурсу для выполнения плана. Он должен видеть, как его решения и слова влияют на команду.
✔️ Коммуникабельность. В большой компании руководитель постоянно договаривается: со своей командой, со смежными отделами, с собственниками, с подрядчиками. Ес…
🔥 Оплатили за вас обучение по программе «ИИ для руководителя» в Школе ГенДира
Коллеги, сегодня последний день, когда при подписке на журнал «Генеральный Директор», вы сможете за наш счет пройти одну из топовых образовательных программ по работе с нейросетями: «ИИ для руководителя» от Школы генерального директора (45 ак. часов + удостоверение).
Чему научитесь:
Программа поможет освоить практические приемы внедрения …
Как отвечать на позитивные отзывы клиентов
Правило работы с позитивными отзывами одно: менеджеры должны на них отвечать. Если отзывов немного, ответьте каждому индивидуально. Сотрудникам нужно:
✔️ прочитать отзывы и подготовить 10–15 шаблонных фраз;
✔️ подставить имя клиента в шаблон, чтобы обращение было персональным;
✔️ поблагодарить клиента за время и усилия, потраченные на хороший отзыв о вашей компании;
✔️ отв…
Почему сильный профессионал может не подойти компании: опыт сооснователя Ushatava
У нас были случаи, когда приходилось расставаться с руководителями уровня CEO-1 или CEO-2 именно из-за soft skills.
Например, один из руководителей в целом мыслил правильно, но доносить свои мысли и идеи команде он не умел категорически. Человек может считать, что он просто требует результата, но команда рядом с ним начинает бояться, …
Уловки сознания, которые мешают сделать правильный выбор
Человеческий мозг часто вводит нас в заблуждение, когда нужно сделать выбор или принять решение. Эти уловки сознания мешают объективно рассмотреть все варианты, найти точную информацию, а также сравнить плюсы и минусы. В итоге мы уверены в своем выборе, но он оказывается неверным. Одна из таких уловок – «Якорение».
Попробуйте ответить на следующие вопросы:
🔹…
Как развивать сотрудников-кандидатов на позиции топ-менеджеров: опыт владельца СушиSell
Когда я вижу человека, который стабильно выполняет договоренности, моя задача — научить его смотреть шире своей задачи. Для этого не обязательно сразу повышать его в должности. Можно последовательно давать задачи, где нужно не просто исполнить поручение, а улучшить результат. Например:
✔️ не просто собрать встречу, а подготовить…
Как заставить работать вместе сотрудников, которые терпеть друг друга не могут
⚠️ Попытки заставить выполнять созидательные задачи, объединять усилия людей, которые откровенно терпеть друг друга не могут, несут в себе риски для компании, например: оказания некачественных услуг, создания продуктов с большим процентом брака, постановки под сомнение репутации организации. Не делайте так.
Если сотрудники и их работа не…
С помощью одной просьбы адаптируйте свое выступление под аудиторию
Перед началом выступления попросите у слушателей задать вопросы, которые у них есть по вашей теме. Это поможет понять, на чем стоит сделать акцент. Даже такая быстрая выборка помогает скорректировать речь – вы сможете быть полезны как минимум тем людям, кто озвучил свой вопрос.
А какие лайфхаки используете вы во время выступлений?
#ГД_советдня
🚀 Т…
Как направлять конфликты между отделами в пользу общего результата: подход Артема Сорокина, ГК «Лебер»
Я не обещаю всем ресурс сразу, а объясняю приоритет. Сейчас у нас одна из точек напряжения — ресурс разработчиков новых изделий. Их внутренние клиенты — руководители продаж и продавцы, которые работают с разными рынками. Каждый хочет, чтобы именно под его рынок разработали продукт в первую очередь. С конструкторами…
Директор вывел три правила делегирования, которые помогают эффективно выбирать исполнителей
Первые три года, когда в компании Fusion работало меньше 10 человек, многие вопросы директор компании самостоятельно. Подчиненным давал только легкие поручения или части задач. Кроме повышенной нагрузки это еще и плохо влияло на сотрудников: они теряли самостоятельность, не развивались в профессии, ленились. Потом штат вырос,…
Даже хорошая зарплата и премии больше не гарантируют лояльность и драйв в команде.
И это не проблема людей. Это системная ошибка в управлении, когда путают два понятия:
💰 Мотивация — это внешняя сделка: «ты — работа, я — деньги».
🔥 Вовлечённость — это внутренний драйв: «я верю в то, что делаю, и вижу, как мои цели сходятся с целями компании». Это то, что нельзя купить, но можно построить.
Те, кто уже прошли этот …
👍3❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @gendir_school. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @gendir_school as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
18 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
18 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
6 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Финансовый директор @financ_director · 20,863 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 25 September 2026
Рабочие лайфхаки: секреты и советы @lifehackoftheday · 25,870 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 September 2026
Налоги для предпринимателей @businessololo · 24,398 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Генеральный Директор” (@gendir_school), 8,504 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gendir_school.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.