Channel
@gemsofthescholars
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
869subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001678913385 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gemsofthescholars |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gemsofthescholars |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:14 | 869 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:52 | 868 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (27 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,142 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 15:52 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ✍ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The GREATEST HARM Imām Muqbil ibn Hādī al-Wādiʿī—may Allāh have mercy on him—said: «أَعْظَمُ مَا يَضُرُّ الْمُسْلِمِينَ هُوَ تَنْفِيرُهُمْ عَنْ عُلَمَائِهِمْ». “The greatest matter which harms the Muslims is the matter of pushing them away from their scholars.” [Al-Samāʿ al-Mubāshir, no. 40] ═══✺✺═══ Translated by: Abū Isḥāq Muḥammad https://t.me/gemsofthescholars https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb8DZ1zLCoX1Zd…
CALAMITIES MAY BE GOOD FOR YOU Imām Muqbil ibn Hādī al-Wādiʿī—may Allāh have mercy on him—said: “When you are afflicted with a calamity, perhaps that calamity is good for you. Whether that calamity is in your wealth, your body, or in any other thing that pains and worries you. It could be a reason to raise you in this world and in the Hereafter.” [Al-Musāraʿah, 1/533] ═══✺✺═══ Translated by: Riḍwān al-Kīnī htt…
SAFETY FROM FITAN Al-ʿAllāmah, Yaḥyā ibn ʿAlī al-Ḥajūrī—may Allāh preserve and protect him—said: «الرُّجُوعُ إِلَى أَهْلِ الْعِلْمِ أَمَنَةٌ مِنَ الْفِتَنِ». “Returning to the people of knowledge is safety from fitan.” [Fatāwā before the Shaykh’s dars, between Maghrib and ʿIshāʾ, 29/11/1445 AH] ═══✺✺═══ Translated by: Abū Muqbil al-Benghālī https://t.me/gemsofthescholars https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb8DZ1z…
THE ACTION OF CHAMPIONS Abū al-Aḥwaṣ Salām ibn Sulaym رحمه الله reported: Sufyān al-Thawrī رحمه الله said to me: “Upon you is the action of champions: earning that which is ḥalāl and spending upon one’s dependants.” [Ḥilyat al-Awliyāʾ by Abū Nuʿaym al-Aṣbahānī, 6/381] ═══✺✺═══ Translated by: Riḍwān al-Kīnī https://t.me/gemsofthescholars https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb8DZ1zLCoX1ZdFuvm3G
NOTHING BREAKS THE BACK OF IBLĪS MORE Sufyān al-Thawrī—may Allāh have mercy on him—said: «لَيْسَ شَيْءٌ أَقْطَعَ لِظَهْرِ إِبْلِيسَ مِنْ قَوْلِ: لَا إِلٰهَ إِلَّا اللهُ». “There is nothing that breaks the back of Iblīs more than the statement: Lā ilāha illā Allāh.” [Siyar Aʿlām al-Nubalāʾ, 7/260] ═══✺✺═══ Translated by: Rashīd al-Canadī https://t.me/gemsofthescholars https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb8DZ1zLCo…
THE GUARDIANS OF THE EARTH Sufyān al-Thawrī—may Allāh have mercy on him—said: “The angels are the guardians of the sky, and Ahl al-Ḥadīth—the people of ḥadīth—are the guardians of the earth.” [Siyar Aʿlām al-Nubalāʾ, 7/274] ═══✺✺═══ Translated by: Rashīd al-Canadī https://t.me/gemsofthescholars https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb8DZ1zLCoX1ZdFuvm3G
BE PROTECTIVE OF THE DAʿWAH Shaykh Yaḥyā al-Ḥajūrī—may Allāh preserve him—said: “I am notifying my brothers that they should not be pleased with any of them tearing the Salafī daʿwah apart.” [Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī lesson, ḥadīth no. 5060, 22 Dhū al-Qaʿdah 1444 AH] ═══✺✺═══ Translated by: Riḍwān al-Kīnī https://t.me/gemsofthescholars https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb8DZ1zLCoX1ZdFuvm3G
WHEN WILL I KNOW THAT I AM RIGHTEOUS? It has been narrated that a man came to ʿĀʾishah رضي الله عنها and asked: “When will I know that I am a muḥsin?” She replied: “When you recognise that you are a sinner.” He asked: “And when will I recognise that I am a sinner?” She replied: “When you believe that you are a muḥsin.” [Al-Tārīkh al-Awsaṭ by al-Bukhārī, 1/12, no. 30] ═══✺✺═══ Translated by: Riḍwān al-Kīnī …
IMĀM AL-BUKHĀRĪ’S FATWĀ ON BEFRIENDING SHĪʿAHS, JAHMĪS, JEWS AND CHRISTIANS Imām al-Bukhārī declared: “I do not see any difference between praying ṣalāh behind a Jahmī or a Rāfiḍī and a Christian or a Jew. They—the Jahmīs and Rāfiḍīs—are not to be greeted, nor are they to be visited, nor are they to be married, nor is their testimony to be accepted, nor are their sacrifices to be eaten.” [Khalq Afʿāl al-ʿIbād, p.…
FASTING IS A SHIELD Ḥafṣah bint Sīrīn—may Allāh have mercy upon her—said: “Fasting is a shield, so long as one does not make holes in it. And making holes in it means al-ghībah (i.e., backbiting).” [Ibn Ḥazm, al-Muḥallā bi-al-Āthār, 4/307] ═══✺✺═══ Translated by: Riḍwān al-Kīnī https://t.me/gemsofthescholars https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb8DZ1zLCoX1ZdFuvm3G
THE BELIEVER YUDĀRĪ AND DOES NOT YUMĀRĪ Al-Ḥasan al-Baṣrī—may Allāh have mercy on him—said: “The believer yudārī (يُدَارِي: he deals gently with others) and does not yumārī (يُمَارِي: he argues and disputes). He spreads the wisdom of Allāh. If it is accepted, then he praises Allāh; and if it is rejected, he praises Allāh.” [Akhlāq al-ʿUlamāʾ of al-Ājurrī, p. 58] Al-Mudārāh (الْمُدَارَاةُ): A verbal noun of دَارَى…
SAFETY LIES IN THE BOOK AND THE SUNNAH Our Shaykh Yaḥyā al-Ḥajūrī—may Allāh preserve him—said: “So will you all not fear Allāh and not let your lives go to waste, every time falling into traps? We have had enough experience, O gathering of Muslims. So what is after the truth except misguidance? Indeed, the right path has been made distinct from the wrong path. The Book and the Sunnah upon the manhaj of the Salaf—…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @gemsofthescholars. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 102,219 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Gems of the Scholars” (@gemsofthescholars), 869 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gemsofthescholars.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.