Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝗚𝗘𝗟𝗔𝗡 𝗢𝗙𝗙𝗜𝗖𝗜𝗔𝗟

Channel

𝗚𝗘𝗟𝗔𝗡 𝗢𝗙𝗙𝗜𝗖𝗜𝗔𝗟

@gelanofficial

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

54subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003544135999
TypeChannel
Username@gelanofficial
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 24 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/gelanofficial

Growth

5456558 August 2026 — 56 subscribers10 August 2026 — 56 subscribers15 August 2026 — 54 subscribers8 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 54–56 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 15:1554-2
10 Aug 2026, 07:4556no change
8 Aug 2026, 11:3256first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 24 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 49s
Average length
36s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

124 reactions across 10 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54224700889324914242217.7%
custom 53438642674959930051713.7%
1612.9%
custom 5422462160422862558118.87%
custom 5422737811423918818108.06%
custom 542258699364732015597.26%
custom 542257327981674751186.45%
💅64.84%
custom 521117622216323096254.03%
custom 531212142693163843243.23%
💘43.23%
custom 531215247954518713032.42%
👻32.42%
🔥21.61%
😍21.61%
custom 539101340056422988110.806%
🦄10.806%

Custom emoji. 10 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 124reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 24 January 2026 to 23 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Feb 2026, 11:01 UTC202 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

🌟🔤ew cover by 🔤ELAN(💋) 💓Song-Bang Bang➡️#gelansolo🤍 Я вернулась с новым кавером и оформлением!🍭 🤩С этого момента я являюсь только соло,надеюсь,что дальнейшие мои действия вам понравятся и вы меня поддержите 🎁

custom 54224700889324914245custom 53121214269316384324custom 53121524795451871303custom 53910134005642298811

17 Feb 2026, 10:39 UTC158 views17 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

[🤩]>i don’t know what I feel. Maybe i can’t do it? Maybe..it’s the end? But maybe it’s start?🐈‍⬛

custom 542247008893249142483custom 54225732798167475113custom 54225869936473201553

16 Feb 2026, 08:18 UTC224 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Never die 🎎

custom 54224700889324914244custom 54225732798167475114custom 54225869936473201553

2 Feb 2026, 16:35 UTC269 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

В онлайн индустрии давно пропала справедливость в отношении безобидных людей, которые просто занимались тем ,что им нравилось(танцы,пение и т.д) Но наша платформа хочет вернуть это качество, поддержав тех ,кто пострадал от необоснованного хейта . "В ои осуждают"-осуждаем теперь мы. https://t.me/Otmena_oihamstvo Приятного всем чтения 👆

custom 54227378114239188183custom 542258699364732015521custom 54224700889324914241custom 54225732798167475111

1 Feb 2026, 11:25 UTC180 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @SlradiioPoll

Best JOURNALIST?😜

  1. Min Mika37%
  2. Asen3%
  3. Baby Jisoo28%
  4. En Ro7%
  5. Adely2%
  6. Gelan4%
  7. Hanni6%
  8. Mina12%
  9. Katzumi3%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

1custom 54227378114239188181

31 Jan 2026, 08:23 UTC201 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🔤 .⚠️• 🤩ust video• .✅🔤 🎁 У меня начинается старческий маразм 🔤🤩nteresting interviews happen when with you Gelan🎇 ✨➖our secrets it's my sweets 🤍 — @gelanofficial & tt — ?? 🍭 【 TagS . ⌗ #interview ٫ #me ٫ #jour 】🔮

custom 54227378114239188186custom 521117622216323096252💅1custom 54225869936473201551

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @gelanofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Feb 2026, 11:25 UTCFinal Results870 voters

Best JOURNALIST?😜

  1. Min Mika37%
  2. Asen3%
  3. Baby Jisoo28%
  4. En Ro7%
  5. Adely2%
  6. Gelan4%
  7. Hanni6%
  8. Mina12%
  9. Katzumi3%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 24 January 2026 to 23 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 450,649 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝗚𝗘𝗟𝗔𝗡 𝗢𝗙𝗙𝗜𝗖𝗜𝗔𝗟” (@gelanofficial), 54 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gelanofficial.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.