Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

GDE TENGE?

@gdetenge

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,047subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002160403072
TypeChannel
Username@gdetenge
CreatedBetween 1 May 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/gdetenge

Growth

3,0473,0573,0526 August 2026 — 3,057 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,057 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,054 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,047 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,046–3,059 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 16:343,047-7
9 Aug 2026, 20:213,054-3
6 Aug 2026, 05:003,057no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:203,057first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
44.5%
avg views ÷ 3,047 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,360
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.59%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held20 (27 February 20264 August 2026)
Views total6,784
Reactions total379
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 00:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,646 reactions across 20 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍74545.3%
29317.8%
🔥25715.6%
💯18611.3%
👏674.07%
🙏171.03%
😁150.911%
😢120.729%
🥴80.486%
😱70.425%
🤣70.425%
🤨60.365%
😈50.304%
😍50.304%
🤷40.243%
30.182%
😨30.182%
🙈30.182%
20.122%
🤝10.061%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,646reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 February 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
34
across the posts below
Posts paid on
14
of 20 we hold a reading for · 70%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @gdetenge. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 February 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 11:41 UTC734 views91 reactions3 Starsread 8 August 2026
Video

Сегодня получил видео из типографии. Моя книга «Не проиграть будущее. Как технологии создают средний класс и меняют государства» официально сдана в печать. Это был долгий путь: исследования, сотни источников, месяцы работы над текстом, графиками и каждой главой. Спасибо издательству AmalBooks за профессионализм и сопровождение этого проекта. Отдельная благодарность паблишеру Бақытжан Бұқарбай за доверие, поддержку и

👍70🔥12👏53😱1

1 Aug 2026, 11:34 UTC≈1,050 views66 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📚♥️Новые приобретения в домашнюю библиотеку. История России всегда интересовала меня не меньше, чем история других государств, а порой — даже больше. Всегда был убежден, что если бы в какой-то момент наш северный сосед свернул на путь конституционализма, отказался от имперских и большевистских догм и сделал ставку на развитие институтов, прав человека и частной инициативы, то вполне мог бы стать одним из ведущих выс

👍41🔥11🥴64💯31

29 Jul 2026, 09:33 UTC≈1,350 views58 reactions3 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

БАНКОВСКАЯ ЗАГАДКА 2026 ГОДА Почти в 2,3 раза сократился объем выданных в Казахстане потребительских кредитов за январь–июль 2026 года по сравнению с аналогичным периодом 2025 года. Первые последствия уже становятся заметны в реальном секторе. Так, в январе–мае импорт одежды и аксессуаров оказался в 3,2 раза ниже, чем годом ранее. Очевидно, что резкое сокращение потребительского кредитования начинает бить по МСБ, п

🔥32💯11🤨64👍3🤣2

22 Jul 2026, 09:04 UTC≈2,050 views56 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Обсудили с Digital Business, что происходит с рублем, почему дорожает жилье в Казахстане и какие риски для нашей экономики создает ситуация в России. По словам казахстанских риелторов, с начала лета количество запросов на покупку недвижимости со стороны граждан России выросло почти вдвое, а в Актау — в несколько раз по сравнению со всем прошлым годом. По данным БНС, в июне 2026 года в стране было зарегистрировано на

👍38🔥86😨2🤝1🤣1

19 Jul 2026, 11:40 UTC≈1,600 views108 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня собрались с коллегами по цеху. Обсудили экономику, политику, налоговый кодекс, бюджетный дефицит и еще десяток тем, без которых люди нашей профессии спокойно чай пить не могут. В очередной раз убедился: если посадить за один стол экономистов, то через 10 минут все уже спорят о будущем страны, через 20 — начинают решать мировые проблемы. Спасибо коллегам за интересный разговор, хорошие идеи и отличную компа

👍80😁13🔥76👏2

3 Jul 2026, 14:38 UTC≈2,300 views62 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026

ДАТА-ЦЕНТРЫ вместо НЕФТИ: спасет ли ИИ экономику Казахстана? Написал для Factcheck.kz аналитическую статью, в которой проанализировал подписанное в июне 2026 года соглашение между правительством Казахстана, компаниями Firebird и NVIDIA о создании в стране вычислительной инфраструктуры искусственного интеллекта мощностью до 1 ГВт стоимостью до 10 млрд долларов США. Власти рассматривают проект как один из ключевых инс

💯3413👍9😱4🔥1😁1

1 Jul 2026, 09:35 UTC≈1,740 views108 reactions6 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Друзья, рад поделиться хорошей новостью! Заключил договор на издание моей книги с паблишером Amal Books. Для автора выбор издателя — это, наверное, одно из самых важных и непростых решений. Поэтому особенно рад, что книга выйдет именно здесь. На мой взгляд, Amal Books — один из лучших паблишеров Казахстана, а его основатель, Бахытжан Бухарбай, — не только мой хороший друг, но и человек, который относится к книгам с

👍8413🔥9😱2

22 Jun 2026, 09:10 UTC≈2,100 views72 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026

"Инфляция 5%, 240 тысяч рабочих мест и рост зарплат": насколько реалистичен новый план правительства Правительство утвердило новый план повышения доходов населения на 2026–2029 годы. Среди ключевых целей — снижение инфляции до 5–7%, повышение зарплат госслужащих и работников компаний системы «Самрук-Казына», а также создание 240 тысяч качественных рабочих мест ежегодно. О том, даст ли новая программа заявленные рез

💯4313👍8😈5🤣3

15 Jun 2026, 06:08 UTC≈2,560 views42 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Топ Telegram-каналов Казахстана в 2026 году по версии Digital Business Digital Business сделал свежую подборку проверенных Telegram-каналов, которые помогают разбираться в экономике, финансах, технологиях, инвестициях, спорте и общественной повестке Казахстана. Среди участников подборки оказался и GDE TENGE. Digital Business – Ваш гид по новой экономике Казахстана. Ловко объясняем движение валюты, логику налогов и

👍22🔥10💯64

11 Jun 2026, 07:51 UTC≈2,580 views92 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Новые правила ЕНПФ: порог достаточности или порог недоступности Поговорили с Digital Business о новых правилах досрочного снятия пенсионных накоплений. Логика властей понятна: они стремятся сохранить больше средств внутри пенсионной системы. Однако она вступает в противоречие с реальностью, в которой доходность ЕНПФ на протяжении многих лет с трудом компенсирует инфляцию, а значит, существует риск существенного обес

👍51💯268🔥7

19 Apr 2026, 09:59 UTC≈3,120 views191 reactions4 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Друзья и коллеги, прошу меня не терять. На некоторое время выпал из публичного поля — не даю интервью и не комментирую экономические события. Полностью сосредоточился на работе над новой книгой. Сейчас нахожусь на этапе, который требует максимальной концентрации и глубокого погружения в материал — это самая сложная и важная часть всей работы. Надеюсь завершить её в ближайшие месяцы и к лету опубликовать результат

👍13030🔥25👏41😨1

26 Mar 2026, 14:09 UTC≈3,710 views109 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Обсудили на канале Гиперборей ситуацию с налоговой реформой, афтершоки от которой уже дают о себе знать. По данным недавнего опроса Demoscope, 77% казахстанцев почувствовали рост расходов после введения нового налогового кодекса, примерно половина населения начала экономить на продуктах, а около 20% — даже на лекарствах. Это уже не просто инфляция, а переход к сжатию потребления, что в макроэкономике является признак

👏47🔥17👍15💯14😢871

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @gdetenge. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 890,888 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“GDE TENGE?” (@gdetenge), 3,047 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gdetenge.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.