Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Где деньги, Стас???

Channel

Где деньги, Стас???

@gdedengistas

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

69subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002216193567
TypeChannel
Username@gdedengistas
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/gdedengistas

Growth

697069.510 Aug 2026, 08:16 — 70 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 06:21 — 69 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 08:1611 Aug 2026, 06:21
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 69–70 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 06:2169-1
10 Aug 2026, 08:1670first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 21s
Average length
1m 21s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

111 reactions across 18 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👎5751.4%
2118.9%
👍109.01%
🔥98.11%
54.50%
💩43.60%
❤‍🔥32.70%
👌10.901%
💘10.901%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 111reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 December 2025 to 3 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 May 2026, 10:14 UTC224 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👎5💩2

27 Apr 2026, 08:21 UTC187 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Запустил канал «Где деньги, Стас?» в MAX. Контент полностью дублируется с Telegram: Если удобнее читать в MAX — подписывайтесь там. Я специально делаю одинаковый контент на двух площадках. Важно не где читать. Важно — понимать и применять цифры вашего бизнеса. Ссылка: 👉 https://maxln.ru/nBY96D

👎5

25 Apr 2026, 10:48 UTC183 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

👎4

23 Apr 2026, 06:53 UTC194 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

В субботу онлайн выступление на строительном форуме в Оренбурге. Тема" Когда нельзя масштабировать строительную компанию?"

👎42🔥2

20 Apr 2026, 06:01 UTC219 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥3👎3

15 Apr 2026, 07:06 UTC206 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Почему рост бизнеса может оставить вас без денег? Есть ошибка, которую делает почти каждый собственник: “Сейчас вырастем — и станет больше прибыли” На практике часто наоборот. Вот что происходит при росте: — заказов становится больше — расходы растут сразу — деньги приходят позже — нагрузка на команду увеличивается И в какой-то момент: 👉 денег на счёте нет 👉 прибыль вроде есть 👉 начинается кассовый разрыв Кейс из пра

👎4🔥1

13 Apr 2026, 15:51 UTC164 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Ты думаешь, что бизнес не зарабатывает. А он зарабатывает — просто ты этого не видишь. Очень частая история. Деньги вроде есть. Оборот идёт. Но в конце месяца ощущение — “прибыли нет” Недавний кейс. Небольшой строительный бизнес. Оборот — 30 млн ₽ в год. Собственник пришёл с задачей: сделать план, как выйти на 500 000 ₽ в месяц. Он был уверен, что сейчас зарабатывает сильно меньше. Начали считать. И оказалось

👎4👍3

3 Apr 2026, 15:15 UTC172 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Кейс: как сохранить бизнес при росте налогов и рисках дробления Ко мне обратился собственник товарного бизнеса из Новороссийска. 2 магазина оффлайн (франшиза+ собственный бренд) + продажи через Ozon. Оборот — 6 млн ₽ в месяц. На старте: — 2 ИП — работа на патенте — изменения в налоговом законодательстве — риск убыточного бизнеса из за слета с патента+НДС — риски дробления бизнеса Главный вопрос: “Налоги всё съедя

👎4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @gdedengistas. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 778,489 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Где деньги, Стас???” (@gdedengistas), 69 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gdedengistas.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.