Channel
@gczy2022
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,795subscribers
-19 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001613800793 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gczy2022 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gczy2022 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:14 | 3,795 | -13 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:48 | 3,808 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:17 | 3,811 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:16 | 3,814 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 29 January 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 20 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
革命火炬内部斗争纪实（链接合集） 革命火炬内部斗争纪实：前言及人物介绍 革命火炬内部斗争纪实：工作改革（5月16日以及之前） 革命火炬内部斗争纪实：工作改革（二）（5月16日~5月23日） 革命火炬内部斗争纪实：群众大会（5月23日） 革命火炬内部斗争纪实：工作改革（三）（5月25日） 革命火炬内部斗争纪实：冲突爆发（5月26日~5月28日） 革命火炬内部斗争纪实：黑暗森林式的沟通（5月29日~5月30日） 革命火炬内部斗争纪实：暴风雨前的宁静（6月1日~6月15日） 革命火炬内部斗争纪实：火炬全面内战（一）（6月16日） 革命火炬内部斗争纪实：火炬全面内战（二）（6月17日~6月22日） 革命火炬内部斗争纪实：火炬全面内战（三）（6月23日） 革命火炬内部斗争纪实：“充满党性原则”的少数派（6月23日以后） 革命火炬内部斗争纪实：路线争鸣（一）对一些指控的澄清 革命火炬内部斗争纪实：路线争鸣（二）什…
该文件总共16万字 一些具体的工作问题上的分歧有时候会转变为原则意义上的分歧，并最终导致组织的分裂，革命火炬这次的分裂正是如此。正是从具体工作问题上的分歧开始，革命火炬内部出现了原则意义上的分歧，最终产生了多数派和少数派的划分。少数派分子在这场斗争中表现出他们在一系列问题上的路线错误：对于民主集中制的歪曲和破坏、影响力挂帅的唯频道论、组织问题上的形而上学、对理论斗争的轻视、对群众组织和代办员网络的忽视、对于政治报的错误理解……少数派的这些错误不是他们独有的，我们写作本文也不仅是为了与少数派分子斗争，更是为更多的左派提供经验材料，最终为中国的左派找到一条正确的路线服务。 现在革命火炬少数派和多数派之间的冲突被公开了出来，演变成电报频道之间公开的辩论和斗争。少数派一直在说我们害怕公开的辩论，事实上并不是如此。我们不能像少数派那样编造和篡改历史然后再进行情绪化的输出，而是需要详细总结这几个月以来革命火炬的历史，然后再去以此进行理论…
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 28 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
革命火炬新主频道设立公告 各位革命火炬的关注者们，你们好！ 自革命火炬2022年11月创办以来，一直在电报平台上开展马列毛主义的宣传工作。最开始我们主要在“革命火炬”频道发布内容，后来因为账号问题分为四个频道（新闻、资料、文章和劳工通讯）。现在我们为了集中大家的阅读与讨论决定重新建立革命火炬的主频道，主频道负责发布重要的通知以及精选四个分频道的内容：各类文章、重要事件的短评、国内外重大集体事件的跟踪报道。除此之外，我们也会抛出一些值得讨论的话题，以供大家在评论区和群内讨论，我们有时也会对讨论进行整理和总结并在此频道发布。欢迎大家关注并参与讨论。 👉👉新主频道链接：革命火炬主频道（新） ———————————————————— 相关链接： 革命火炬主频道（新） 革命火炬之新闻及时评 革命火炬之理论历史文章 革命火炬之劳工通讯 革命火炬之资料文件 革命火炬（旧主频道） 想要联系我们可以私信频道机器人：@communist18…
为了更好地推动革命事业，革命火炬频道从今天开始招募新人进行频道工作（新闻搜集、撰写新闻短评的文案、时评写作、理论类或者历史类文章的写作等等），希望有意向的同志能加入我们。填写以下google问卷 https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1dgbphwqCp6iRRAvcSI1aIb9Rv7P-epeOICcNgIIoViw/ 并联系革命火炬频道机器人@communist1848bot 发送一条消息，即可参与报名。我们会通过频道机器人联系到你并告知审核结果。此问卷作答情况只为我们审核使用，不会向火炬之外的人透露任何信息，请放心作答。
交通银行员工 今年新入职员工无法拿到和往年新入职的员工的数额年终奖，只是象征性发几百块钱作为年终奖，而且没有任何解释。 #worker
各位同志新年快乐！ 我们希望各位不要被自由派的“除习”等谬论绊住手脚，在新的一年里更加深切的经济危机会降临到中特和它的走狗当中，我们希望各位明确的看到，中修的统治阶级和它的代表人是表里一体的，我们可以希望某位高高在上的主席滚下台，但是也要清楚，要是不将旧的统治机器砸个粉碎，这对于剥削阶级只不过是换了个领头羊来剥削罢了。 在新的一年我们希望各位同志主动打破中修和自我的封锁，主动的到工人中去，到学生中去，到一切备受压迫的劳动群众中去，把一切对专制制度和资本主义不满和愤怒汇集起来，化作冲天的火焰，烧毁旧制度，锻造新世界！
美国向以色列追加141亿美元军事援助 🟡 最新加沙战争新闻综述： 🟡 以色列对加沙的无情战争造成的死亡人数已达27478人，66835多人受伤。 🟡️ 美国参议员为以色列发布了新的紧急资金法案，其中包括141亿美元的军事援助，其中包括40亿美元用于以色列的铁穹系统。 🟡️ 以色列占领海军，袭击了等待进入加沙地带北部的救援车队，近东救济工程处加沙办事处主任托马斯·怀特说。 🟡️ 以色列占领军轰炸了加沙地带南部拉法市的一所幼儿园，造成两名儿童死亡，数十人受伤。 🟡️ 被困在加沙城al-Shifa医院内的卫生工作者、病人和流离失所者“完全吓坏了”，因为以色列狙击手继续以该地区的人为目标，造成至少7名巴勒斯坦人死亡。 🟡️ Deir el Balah市的空袭造成约30人死亡，据报道有数十人受伤。由于医护人员和物资严重短缺，许多伤员无法立即得到救治。 🟡️ 以色列占领军连夜突袭了被占领约旦河西岸的几个巴勒斯坦城镇。在杰宁以南的亚巴德镇…
融工故事（三）：被赶走的左翼青年和跟着走的青年左翼 至此，融工故事系列就告一段落了，这些故事本身并不激情澎湃，也没有想象中一路高歌的傲人成果，但是教训本身被加以重视，也能成为前进的动力。 行将结束之际，我们注意到了某频道的攻讦。文章本身很是花了心思，然而雄辩的文笔掩饰不住精英主义的傲慢，缭乱的话术是不过用来展示诡辩的逻辑，更有趣的，作者对这种争论中每一个细枝末节的理解都暴露了自己经济主义的立场。文章本身不过是被派别偏见支配下的产物，一如既往的带着曲解和傲慢。 是先建立坚强的革命家组织，用正确的路线指导工人工作？还是先从工人群众目前“最容易接受”的工人娱乐社团等组织开始，无限延期革命家组织的建立？这场分歧的全部实质不过是如此。而忽视这个分歧的实质，刻意曲解出线上与线下的对立的两条路线，编造出厂内与厂外的对立的两种立场就是在模糊争论焦点，消解争论的严肃性，阻碍整体革命进程罢了。 【我们是新十月，欢迎大家关注，投稿和联系邮箱：…
2月2日，南宁华润西园农民工讨薪，随后赶来的特警将他们一个个拖走。 #worker
1月30日，上海宣布大幅放开购房资格，在本市连续缴纳社保个税满五年的非本市户籍居民，可在外环以外区域限购一套住房。 #经济
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @gczy2022. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 742,724 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“革命火炬” (@gczy2022), 3,795 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gczy2022.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.