Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

gbwce

@gbwcel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

43subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003664785055
TypeChannel
Username@gbwcel
DescriptionBe The Threat To Defeat It
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/gbwcel

Growth

437 August 2026 — 43 subscribers10 August 2026 — 43 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 42–44 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 16:4643no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:3343first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 24 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
180.5%
avg views ÷ 43 subscribers
Avg views / post
77.6
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.94%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held19 (24 June 202610 August 2026)
Views total776
Reactions total27
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 16:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
73
Videos
6
Links
44

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
31s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

56 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1933.9%
👍1933.9%
😁916.1%
🤔610.7%
🔥23.57%
🤩11.79%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 56reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 14:59 UTC15 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @sec_postPhoto

💸 Московский метрополитен закупает SIEM от «Лаборатории Касперского» на 281 млн рублей На портале госзакупок появился аукцион на поставку 300 лицензий системы сбора и корреляции событий информационной безопасности (SIEM) Kaspersky. Общая начальная цена — 281,2 млн рублей, стоимость одной лицензии — 937 тыс. рублей. В техническом задании указано, что SIEM должна быть совместима с уже установленными в инфраструктуре

10 Aug 2026, 09:38 UTC20 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @v01dch4nn3l

Windows Service – Purple Team https://ipurple.team/2026/07/06/windows-service/

28 Jul 2026, 10:10 UTC66 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @byteoflifePhoto

Дампим SAM/SYSTEM через 7-Zip Знакомая ситуация: вы на машине юзера, нужно достать хеши, но reg save или copy блокируются EDR, файлы заблокированы самой Windows, а антивирус палит известные утилиты. Но на рабочих станциях часто установлен 7-Zip! И у него есть крутая недокументированная фича - чтение необработанных дисков (raw disk access). А можно использовать и для DFIR. Чем проще и банальнее тем лучше : )

4🔥1

21 Jul 2026, 12:13 UTC100 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @ots0sintPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

15 Jul 2026, 15:47 UTC96 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @alukatskyPhoto

Решил тут покопаться в том, как работают переговорщики с ransomware-группировками... А наткнулся на истории не только "белых", но и "серых" переговорщиков, которые, работая в ИБ-компаниях или в качестве независимых консультантов, при этом подрабатывают на стороне, помогая вымогателям получать деньги с жертв. Ну и про "черных" переговорщиков тоже нашлось немало в утечках ransomware-группировок – это те, кто занимается

3

15 Jul 2026, 04:20 UTC94 viewsread 10 August 2026

Участник программы-вымогателя Ryuk признает себя виновным в США, ему грозит 15 лет тюрьмы https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/ryuk-ransomware-member-pleads-guilty-in-the-us-faces-15-years-in-prison/

10 Jul 2026, 10:42 UTC113 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @yndxcloudsecurityVideo

Показываем Yandex SIEM в работе прямо здесь ну почти Полную версию смотрите в новом выпуске AM DEMO. Нужное можно искать сразу по таймкодам ⬇️⬇️⬇️ 01:14 Настройка событий для логирования 02:18 Расследования и работа с запросами 04:02 Пакеты правил корреляции 05:16 Редактирование правил и режимы обработки 06:55 Исключения и удобство для аналитиков 08:01 Мониторинг событий и производительности 09:46 Алерты и помощник

7 Jul 2026, 16:36 UTC131 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

День 5/100 | Практический кейс Blue Team «Аналитик L1 говорит: "Сработал алерт на выполнение странного PowerShell-скрипта. Я проверил классические места автозагрузки (Startup), Планировщик (Scheduled Tasks), Реестр (Run keys) и Службы (Services) - ничего подозрительного. Процесс уже завершился, новых файлов на диске нет. Вероятно, админ запустил скрипт для сбора инфы, закрываю инцидент"». Вы забираете тикет на дораб

👍5

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @gbwcel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“gbwce” (@gbwcel), 43 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gbwcel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.