Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝙇𝙞𝙛𝙚 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝 𝙋𝙤𝙡𝙞𝙣 ❕

Channel

𝙇𝙞𝙛𝙚 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝 𝙋𝙤𝙡𝙞𝙣 ❕

@gastikh

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

139subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002336839427
TypeChannel
Username@gastikh
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/gastikh

Growth

138141139.57 August 2026 — 139 subscribers8 August 2026 — 139 subscribers15 August 2026 — 138 subscribers21 August 2026 — 140 subscribers29 August 2026 — 141 subscribers7 September 2026 — 139 subscribers1397 August 20267 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 31 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 138–141 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 17:37139-2
29 Aug 2026, 15:03141+1
21 Aug 2026, 20:47140+2
15 Aug 2026, 01:18138-1
8 Aug 2026, 22:45139no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:37139first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 16 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

216 reactions across 5 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54066215049914212593717.1%
custom 5406800231465511574219.72%
custom 5244950092632307577209.26%
177.87%
💘177.87%
💋167.41%
custom 5229088937321992792156.94%
custom 5406799518500938942146.48%
custom 5204167771839032935136.02%
custom 5458769168243382415136.02%
🍓115.09%
🕊115.09%
custom 544310655209127016262.78%
👀31.39%
10.463%
🙉10.463%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 216 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 20:33 UTC37 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

😊 С днём рождения меня !! It’s my birthday 🌟 !! Спасибо всем , кто меня поздравил , мне было очень приятно !!

💘9custom 54066215049914212596custom 54587691682433824156custom 52290889373219927925custom 54431065520912701622custom 52041677718390329351custom 52449500926323075771

5 Aug 2026, 18:28 UTC49 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤩Kaliningrad part1.

🕊8custom 52041677718390329357🍓6custom 545876916824338241542custom 54066215049914212592custom 540680023146551157421

14 Jul 2026, 18:11 UTC162 views49 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🎋 Пушкинские горы

custom 54066215049914212599💘7custom 52290889373219927927custom 540679951850093894254custom 52041677718390329354custom 52449500926323075774🍓3

5 Jul 2026, 08:14 UTC212 views46 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌟matcha 🎀

custom 54068002314655115741211custom 54067995185009389427custom 52449500926323075773custom 54066215049914212593🍓2🕊2custom 52290889373219927922

16 Jun 2026, 20:17 UTC289 views57 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🎀выездные соревнования ⭐️

custom 540662150499142125917💋16custom 524495009263230757712custom 54068002314655115744custom 54067995185009389422custom 54431065520912701622🕊1custom 52041677718390329351

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @gastikh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝙇𝙞𝙛𝙚 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝 𝙋𝙤𝙡𝙞𝙣 ❕” (@gastikh), 139 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gastikh.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.