Channel
@gardenhowl
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
58subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002126481161 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gardenhowl |
| Description | i have so many parts of me to meet still. |
| Created | 23 April 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gardenhowl |
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:31 | 58 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 23 April 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (23 April 2024 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 544 |
| Reactions total | 193 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 01:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
517 reactions across 14 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5352580727529559662 | 70 | 13.5% | |
| custom 5449610927873761968 | 67 | 13.0% | |
| custom 5242560939764507190 | 44 | 8.51% | |
| custom 5337009555526162676 | 36 | 6.96% | |
| custom 5240434668959982401 | 32 | 6.19% | |
| custom 5240171855616168830 | 26 | 5.03% | |
| custom 5298860440527334397 | 26 | 5.03% | |
| custom 5408994852379598545 | 26 | 5.03% | |
| custom 5271963525663716612 | 19 | 3.68% | |
| custom 5366231520870692027 | 18 | 3.48% | |
| custom 5296381415468855792 | 17 | 3.29% | |
| custom 5388720880165620795 | 17 | 3.29% | |
| custom 5404399623919933074 | 15 | 2.90% | |
| custom 5204330886107003291 | 14 | 2.71% | |
| custom 5240174608690208257 | 14 | 2.71% | |
| custom 5348108957904833933 | 13 | 2.51% | |
| custom 5289715505966364292 | 11 | 2.13% | |
| custom 5357104139841085696 | 11 | 2.13% | |
| custom 5449535456708439271 | 10 | 1.93% | |
| custom 5386364802840956242 | 9 | 1.74% | |
| 4 further kinds | 22 | 4.26% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 517reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 23 April 2024 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
есть мысль снова все переделать (касаемо инфо), потому что эту прошлую версию я делала в спешке ииииии не сказала бы, что на все 100% довольна. думаем.
custom 533700955552616267610custom 544953545670843927110custom 544961092787376196810
File, posted without a caption
custom 544961092787376196814custom 535710413984108569611custom 529886044052733439710
🕷 AU itafushi х spider-man ! 🦢I had to tell ya, it's now or never🦢 продолжение в комментариях.
custom 533700955552616267626custom 540899485237959854526custom 544961092787376196824
＃ association by 春颯 ݁ ˖ 🤩 (_ _|||) results ᵎᵎ you should: рп, отметка i, in turn: (подробно в коммах) place: ?/? 🤩 ‹𝟹 open
закреп обновлен. от каррда я отреклась, поэтому теперь узнавайте обо мне напрямую (я так флиртую). сядем друг напротив друга и будем обсуждать все – от любимого цвета до любимой теории заговора. не знаю, есть ли смысл репостить эту анкетку, но если у кого-то появится желание, буду очень благодарна 🤩
custom 52988604405273343979custom 53887208801656207959custom 54496109278737619688
я сейчас именно там, где хочу быть.
custom 544961092787376196811custom 53887208801656207958custom 52988604405273343977
с улыбкой смотрю на то, как сбываются те вещи, о которых я когда-то говорила. и правда зорко одно лишь сердце.
custom 527196352566371661219custom 529638141546885579210custom 54227870704038401669
File, posted without a caption
custom 53662315208706920277custom 52809847093319725333custom 52651695617113200382
🤩 всех с началом весны! слушайте новый альбом gorillaz.
custom 534810895790483393313custom 528971550596636429211custom 536623152087069202711
🤩 статья о икебане: история появления искусства «кадо» и его смысл.
custom 535258072752955966212custom 53863648028409562429custom 53327063848426132348
satoru, is that you?
custom 535258072752955966216custom 524256093976450719011custom 524017185561616883010
эти хэдканоны стары как мир, но. пирсинг пупка у сугуру и языка у сатору.. мысли?
custom 524256093976450719016custom 53525807275295596629custom 52963814154688557927
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @gardenhowl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 808,509 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“garden” (@gardenhowl), 58 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gardenhowl.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.