Channel
@garantino
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
314subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001633817790 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @garantino |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/garantino |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:36 | 314 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:34 | 315 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:16 | 315 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:55 | 314 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 21 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
95 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5215605274043241007 | 23 | 24.2% | |
| custom 5215662122230373126 | 23 | 24.2% | |
| custom 5217451616059282445 | 20 | 21.1% | |
| custom 5226825931938614620 | 17 | 17.9% | |
| custom 5215318563501397083 | 7 | 7.37% | |
| custom 5215170378539749718 | 5 | 5.26% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 95reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2025 to 3 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @garantino. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2025 to 3 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
😈 Время минтить Дуриков! Минт уже готов: фиксируй результаты уникальных образов прямиком в свой кошелёк. Увековеченное в блокчейне, порой, может принести больше, чем в памяти. ⚡️ Сминтить Дурика | Коммьюнити
custom 52174516160592824455custom 52153185635013970833
🤭
как мы доили мев-ботов в $TON мев-бот — это скрипт, который мониторит чужие сделки и вставляется впереди них. твою покупку он увидел, проскочил с покупкой раньше, цена прыгнула > ты заплатил больше. бот вышел с разницы в несколько %. рыночная неэффективность, которую могли бы забирать мы. у любого бота есть паттерн. это просто скрипт с условиями. найди точку А и точку Б и сам сможешь играть против него. как работ…
TwoxPump. раг первый новый проект, старая команда. вчера мы торговали мемкоины, сегодня запускаем их сами. софта для продаж у нас пока не было, только костыльные решения, собранные из того, что было под рукой. деплой и пост шли в одно время. запускаем токен из линейки симпсонов, через пару минут выходит пост. пока я его дописывал, капа уже летела вверх, а на графике рисовались иксы. сижу, допечатываю, в наушниках …
custom 52156621222303731262
BYBIT КРАДЁТ ДЕНЬГИ ПОЛЬЗОВАТЕЛЕЙ? Недавний фад вокруг биржи и блокировок казался ежегодным фадом, которому подвержены большинство бирж, однако, пост вышел не просто так, верно? Теперь и мой аккаунт, на который я перевёл деньги с MEXC — оказался заблокирован без объяснения причин. Никакого толкового ответа на причины мне не последовало, где сквозь насмешку мне сказали ожидать до 30 дней. Когда аккаунт блокируют, …
custom 52156621222303731261
🚬 Давно меня тут не было… ❄️ С Новой Годой вас!
custom 52156052740432410079
🙂 Одним подарком застрелил двух зайцев Брал чуть меньше 50 эскимо, выпало два с черным фоном, ониксом и пепа. Мне удалось пропустить эту мету, но в целом, одним-двумя подарками смог окупить все свои покупки. К слову, на мой вкус, пока что это самая красивая пепа с других коллекций, не считая саму Plush Pepe, к тому же и одна из самых редких. Гем?
custom 52268259319386146206
Спасибо за подарок на ДР от Паши за твх 0,6$ 💖
custom 52174516160592824455
🔥 Так выглядит тильт Выставляя пачку совсем забыл про номера. Вот результат…
custom 52156052740432410073
😂 Как там мем сезон на тоне?
custom 52156621222303731264
🦴 Не открывал этот канал всего два дня Это же воштрейдинг, стикеры никогда не вырастут и они вообще никому не нужны. Гем — покупать токены, а-ля Чебурашка на лоукапе, которые так и останутся на лоукапе. 🤭 Да?
custom 52156052740432410073custom 52153185635013970832
😱 А вы тоже не заметили? Как осенью появилась мемляндия, как пошла мета щитков на тоне, и как многие проигнорировали тогда мету подарков? А сейчас заметили, как пытаются задать тренд на мелкокапы, запустить мемляндию 2.0, и как многие продолжают игнорировать стикеры? 🫥 Я тоже не заметил…
custom 52156052740432410073custom 52153185635013970832
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @garantino. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,062,592 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Garantino” (@garantino), 314 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/garantino.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.