Channel
@gamezon
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
978,775subscribers
-11,362 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001979420211 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gamezon |
| Description | Твой лучший канал об играх - #GAMEZONE По вопросам рекламы @vr777 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gamezon |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @pekagame/457986 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC | @gamezon/514 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @pekagame/458026 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC | @gamezon/518 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @pekagame/458066 Aug 2026, 17:06 UTC | @gamezon/522 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 17:07 UTC | 1.00 | 72 seconds |
| @pekagame/458307 Aug 2026, 08:16 UTC | @gamezon/537 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 08:16 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @pekagame/458357 Aug 2026, 09:07 UTC | @gamezon/542 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 09:07 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @pekagame/458427 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC | @gamezon/549 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 12:32 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @pekagame | 7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @pekagame (7–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 7 of the 7 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 9 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @pekagame. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:02 | 978,775 | -1,357 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:01 | 980,132 | -3,680 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:41 | 983,812 | -1,610 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:51 | 985,422 | -2,736 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:21 | 988,158 | -1,979 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:15 | 990,137 | first reading |
51 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 51 (6 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 782,685 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 17:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 20 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
| Post | Readings | Latest reading | Curve | 24h reach | Half of last-observed views by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /5497 Aug 2026, 12:32 UTC | 28 minutes – 48 minutes old | 4 viewsno reaction reading | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | 21 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /5477 Aug 2026, 11:18 UTC | 52 minutes – 2.0 hours old | 9,630 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 6,458 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 58 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /5467 Aug 2026, 10:19 UTC | 530 minutes – 3.0 hours old | 9,630 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 9,620 → 3.0 hours: 9,630views have flattened out | not yet at 24h | 30 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading |
| /5427 Aug 2026, 09:07 UTC | 87 minutes – 4.2 hours old | 11,800 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 11,800 interp. → 3.0 hours: 11,800views have flattened out | not yet at 24h | 7 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading |
| /5377 Aug 2026, 08:16 UTC | 99 minutes – 5.1 hours old | 21 viewsno reaction reading | 60 minutes: 7 → 3.0 hours: 14still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 2.2 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /5367 Aug 2026, 07:20 UTC | 965 minutes – 6.0 hours old | 16,300 views ~no reaction reading | 3.0 hours: 16,300 → 6.0 hours: 16,300views have flattened out | not yet at 24h | 65 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading |
| /5357 Aug 2026, 06:13 UTC | 1136 minutes – 7.1 hours old | 21,100 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 21,000 interp. → 3.0 hours: 21,100 → 6.0 hours: 21,100views have flattened out | not yet at 24h | 36 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading |
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed viewsis the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Инт в Шанхае стартует уже завтра! Болеем за любимые команды и 我们下注 Открываем клетки с призами, ищем Золотой Рундук и доходим до 罗尚的巢穴! Призов хватит на всех — между теми, кто откроет Логово Рошана, разделят 3 000 000 фрибетов
Увековечен в пиве
Я больше не ARMA, теперь я Kingdom Come: Deliverance Для ARMA 3 вышел имбовый мод, который полностью меняет игру и делает из неё средневековую песочницу. ➖Доступны мультиплеер и одиночная игра с квестами. ➖Действие происходит в 15 веке, вокруг вас огромный мир с замками, деревнями и религиозными зданиями. ➖Куча экипировки – от холодного оружия до доспехов и аксессуаров. ➖Оценка в мастерской Steam – 5/5, весит 2Гб. …
Такая годнота могла бы быть
Танкам сегодня 16 лет — в честь этого разрабы дарят прем. технику VI уровня всем, кто сыграет 1+ бой до 20 августа. В обновлении на день рождения в игру завезли: — Подарочный набор с танком VI уровня СУ-100И, 3 дня премиум аккаунта и скином. — Золотой вагон, где ты сможешь обменять серебро на золото. — И розыгрыш на 16 000+ призов: ПК, ноутбуки, видеокарты, около 10 лет премиума, 1 млн золота и другие призы. Лутае…
⚡Коллаба Helldivers 2 и Warhammer 40,000 вышла Также игра получила большую обнову, внутри: ➖Новый боевое пропуск с оружием, броней, скинами и другими шмотками в стиле Warhammer 40,000 (второй видос). ➖Теперь можно высаживаться на планету Иллюминатов и вести бои прямо там. ➖Новые враги с новыми способностями. ➖Потолок уровней увеличен, добавлены новые эмоции. Обнова уже в игре, работаем
Диалоги в «Снежной». Обстановка. Всё по канонам
Каждый второй пенсионер оказался геймером — неожиданную статистику собрали аналитики big data T2 Оператор изучил трафик почти 2000 игр и игровых платформ и выяснил, что среди людей старше 55 лет играет уже каждый второй. Причём всего за год таких геймеров стало втрое больше. Но самое интересное — игры вообще оказались развлечением далеко не только для молодёжи: среди людей 35–44 лет играют уже двое из трёх. А женщи…
В России выросло желание «выебать Человека-Паука» – спрос на эротические костюмы супергероя увеличился на 42% за несколько месяцев. При этом активно покупают как мужские, так и женские костюмы. Мы живем в обществе
Razer выпустила трёхпальцевую мышку – у Naga V3 Pro есть отдельная кнопка под безымянный палец. Всего у неё может быть до 23 настраиваемых кнопок + 2 сменные панели. Цена вопроса – $180 (15к рублей). Для самых бодрых пальчиков
Netflix уже готовит адаптацию
Minecraft теперь полноценная экшн-RPG: топовая сборка Craft to Exile 2 обновилась до версии 2.0 По ключевым фичам: ➖Полностью новая боёвка с уклонениями и активными способностями; ➖Классы персонажей с разными стилями игры; ➖Гигантское дерево прокачки в духе Path of Exile; ➖Система лута, руны и переработанный крафт; ➖Полноценная кампания из 5 актов на 250+ квестов; ➖Кастомные мобы и боссы. В 2.0 мощно прокачали эндг…
Showing the 12 most recent of 51 posts we hold for @gamezon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 989,530 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Игровая зона” (@gamezon), 978,775 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gamezon.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.