Channel
@gamayunov_finance
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,665subscribers
+14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001347465270 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gamayunov_finance |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gamayunov_finance |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:48 | 1,665 | +15 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:13 | 1,650 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:33 | 1,651 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:59 | 1,651 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
225 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 124 | 55.1% | |
| 🔥 | 34 | 15.1% | |
| 👏 | 17 | 7.56% | |
| 🙈 | 11 | 4.89% | |
| 🤩 | 11 | 4.89% | |
| 👾 | 10 | 4.44% | |
| 🌚 | 7 | 3.11% | |
| 🤔 | 7 | 3.11% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 1.78% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 225reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 April 2026 to 13 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @gamayunov_finance. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 April 2026 to 13 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Есть три человека, которые распоряжаются нашими деньгами. И один из них почти никогда не получает слово 🤐 Если в голове звучат фразы: «Это очень дорого», «Не трать лишнего», «Вдруг потом не хватит?», скорее всего, сейчас решения принимаете не совсем вы. Смотрим на ситуацию через модель «Ребёнок — Родитель — Взрослый». Когда возникает мысль: «Надо купить прямо сейчас!» — говорит Ребёнок, которому приспичило. Когд…
❤15🔥1
Обновленный тренинг по финграмотности с наставником по развитию мышления Константином Песьяковым🔥 Назвали - Финграмотность Взрослого. Во-первых, потому что мы с вами по возрасту уже такими являемся, а деньгами чаще распоряжаемся как дети 👴 Во-вторых, потому что Взрослым быть круто – он не действует автоматически из эмоций или старых установок, а оценивая ситуацию здесь и сейчас осознанно делает то что принесет жел…
❤10
Убирать финансовое напряжение 🌟 Сижу читаю разные исследования про финансовую тревогу, оказывается чаще всего она возникает не из-за нехватки денег, а из-за перегрузки тревожащими сигналами: прочитали плохую новость (других сейчас почти не делают), подруга пожаловалась на то что «всё дорожает», счёт на оплату прислали на который в моменте не хватает денег или напоминание пришло о списании обязательного платежа через…
❤13
В чём опасность фразы «У меня нет денег»? Прояснял для себя с ИИ идеи Альфреда Коржибски, бывшего офицера разведки российской армии, который после революции уехал в Америку и уже там создал дисциплину под названием «Семантика», которая рассматривает язык как инструмент мышления и адаптации. Цитирую, убрав лишнее, очень важный ответ на вопрос: в чём опасность фразы «У меня нет денег»? С точки зрения Коржибского оп…
❤15
Бесплатный МК - с которого стоит начать
👏2
Video message, posted without a caption
🤩3
Спустя две недели он подводил итоги мая и всего тренинга 👆
🔥4
Voice message, posted without a caption
❤1
у меня три недели назад как-то жизнь так повернулась, что я реально за голову брался. У меня куча финансовых, долговых обязательств. Уже не то что коллекторы, но какие-то не то что угрозы… А у меня ни копейки. Я на такой крайности был — об этом рассказывает участник тренинга в голосовом, которое он записал несколько недель назад. Послушайте, если у вас с финансами сейчас сложно и вдохновитесь на новые действия, вид…
❤1
ГДЕ ЖИМ-ЖИМ — ТУДА БЕЖИМ❗️
❤8👾4😁4
Как справиться с финансовой тревогой опираясь на научные данные? Исследования показывают: тревога о деньгах усиливается, когда человек чувствует беспомощность. И рекомендуют простой лайфхак - наглядно показать себе на что мы можем повлиять, а на что - нет. Делаем список из двух колонок: 1. “могу повлиять” 2. “не могу повлиять” и описываем текущие финансовые вводные, мысли и дела которые хочется/надо сделать. В …
❤10👏5🤩1
Тревожность плотно общий фон заняла собой - такая нынче реальность, которую мы создали. Буду делать серию постов с рекомендациями, которые помогут как минимум финансовую тревогу снизить значительно. Сработает лучше если не просто прочитаете, а и сделаете то, что буду предлагать 😊 Комменты, реакции и, конечно, репосты — лучшая благодарность и топливо для меня. Так что будьте щедрыми, это прикольное чувство, благород…
❤15👏5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @gamayunov_finance. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,014,505 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Финансовый терапевт Gamayunov” (@gamayunov_finance), 1,665 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gamayunov_finance.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.