Channel
@galzilla
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
109subscribers
+17 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003755330277 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @galzilla |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/galzilla |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 01:01 | 109 | +4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:57 | 105 | +5 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 05:52 | 100 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:18 | 99 | +6 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:16 | 93 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:38 | 93 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:47 | 92 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
117 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 42 | 35.9% | |
| custom 5271822156815170878 | 35 | 29.9% | |
| custom 5767142382667567525 | 26 | 22.2% | |
| custom 5764659775606361542 | 7 | 5.98% | |
| custom 5272004929148452892 | 6 | 5.13% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 0.855% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 117 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Думаете открыть какой-нибудь бизнес связанный с жсф/гяру? Было бы прикольно магазинчик открыть Да возможно в будущем можно будет открыть , но мы не прям сильно думали об этом. У нас как минимум на это нету бюджета, и в принципе жсф в Казахстане ну не сильно развито. А мы его как раз развиваем и если у нас все получится и будет много денег то почему бы и нет ?
custom 52718221568151708784
Если я не из Москвы мне нельзя в гяруса ? Чувак мы из Казахстана, какая Москва?
custom 52718221568151708786
Ещё 6 и будет 100
custom 52718221568151708783
И гяруса вести давольно легко , главное найти гяру которые будут подходить под ваш запрос если есть идея создать что-то типо анджелик там с одними куро . А так просто создаёте объявляете о наборе участников и все , следите чтобы все были дружные и не конфликтовали
❤6
привет привет, расскажите, какие сложности есть в "содержании" гяруса? как вы их преодолеваете? какие проблемы были на старте? как лучше начать вести свою гяруса? 🩷🤲 Ну единственная проблема это если вы захотите провести какое либо мероприятие, вам обязательно нужны ответственные люди которые смогут взять ответственность и вести за собой целую гяруса и все организовывать . А так особо проблем никаких нету , мы все …
❤6
Пишите пообщаемся
custom 52718221568151708782
А ещё можете по братский репосты там комментарии , типо о молодцы ну наши айайай
custom 57671423826675675256custom 52718221568151708783❤1custom 57646597756063615421
Больше реакций!
custom 52718221568151708784custom 52720049291484528921custom 57671423826675675251
Posted without readable text
custom 576714238266756752519custom 52718221568151708785custom 52720049291484528925custom 57646597756063615421
Скоро сяду за написание поста о том как пошел предыдущий фест ... Обещаю
❤7
Наша красавица
❤5custom 52718221568151708783
💋: Я не смогла попасть к добряку, зато сделала крутые фоточки с косплеерами👅
❤6custom 52718221568151708785
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @galzilla. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GALZILLA” (@galzilla), 109 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/galzilla.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.