Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Stranniza

Channel
@galkastranniza
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
600subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001392295355 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @galkastranniza |
| Created | Between 1 July 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/galkastranniza |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 00:20 | 600 | +2 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 05:21 | 598 | +5 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:13 | 593 | +1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 19:37 | 592 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:26 | 594 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 596 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:10 | 596 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
147 reactions across 11 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 39 | 26.5% | |
| 🔥 | 36 | 24.5% | |
| 👍 | 23 | 15.6% | |
| 🆒 | 12 | 8.16% | |
| 💘 | 12 | 8.16% | |
| 🤩 | 11 | 7.48% | |
| 😍 | 7 | 4.76% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 3.40% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.36% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 147 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Stranniza
#korea #корея Граница Насмотревшись рилс о том, как "нас не пустили в Корею", Галя начала паниковать. Не за себя, а за молодую, красивую, незамужнюю дочерь. Гале снилось, как "в темной комнате для допроса нас держали сто дней".😂 И, нет, мы летели не в Северную, а в Южную. В итоге, собрав весь интернет в кулак и опросив ИИ на предмет "как не стать той идиоткой из рилс" был собран пакет документов для себя и дочери…
🔥10❤5👏2💯2
Signed Stranniza
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Stranniza
#SPF #СПФ Последний в загашнике СПФ, который будем обсуждать D'ALBA PIEDMONT Waterfull+ UV Essence Sun Cream SPF50+ Pa++++ Популярность возвысила его до небес из-за рекламы Шейк, но стоит ли оно того и что там вообще во внутрянке. Пробежимся по составу и активам: ⭐Ниацинамид ⭐Аденозин и далее всё на поддержке экстрактов (как правило, в составе их очень мало, но все равно это хорошо). ⭐Экстракт центеллы азиатика ⭐Э…
❤9💘3
Signed Stranniza
Есть такой анекдот про богатство и успех. Одного миллиардера спросили, как он разбогател. И тот рассказал: мол, я в траве нашел хорошее яблоко. Помыл его, а потом продал в два раза дороже. И на вырученные деньги купил два яблока. Помыл их, протер до блеска, потом продал дороже. И купил четыре яблока. Потом эти четыре продал дороже; купил восемь... Так я начал путь к успеху. Я был прилежен и трудолюбив. А потом дяд…
❤5💯3
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Stranniza
#SPF #СПФ #Skin1004 Madagascar Centella Hyalu-cica Water-fit Sun Serum SPF50+ Pa++++ Довольно популярный бренд в России, однако, с посредственной популярностью в Корее. На полках стоит, но дерматологи/косметологи его как серьезный не рассматривают. Однако, мы не гонимся за тем, "что покупают кореянки", мы ищем составы, которые нам нравятся, они работают на любой коже и пофиг, что там кто покупает и советует. Мы в…
🔥7🆒4
Signed Stranniza
#СПФ #SPF Легкий солнцезащитный крем Beauty Of Joseon Relief Sun Aqua-fresh Rice+B5 SPF50+ PA++++ Это новая версия нашего любимчика, который верой и правдой наш фаворит с 2023 года. Однако, версия "с голубинкой"😂 при проверке состава проигрывает классической (бежевато-розовой), назовем так что ли.😂 В Корее лучше "заходит" в продажах Round Lab (хорошая реклама и рейтинги), но Joseon берут тоже, не так активно, но в…
❤13👍3🆒2
Signed Stranniza
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Stranniza
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Stranniza
#SPF #СПФ Итак, самый лучший СПФ в Корее, который бьет все рекорды продаж, хороших отзывов и стоит на вершине рейтингов c 2023 года! #ROUND_LAB Birch Juice Moisturizing Sunscreen SPF 50+, Pa++++ Увлажняющий солнцезащитный крем для лица SPF 50+ PA++++ Типа, с березовым соком, все такое увлажнение, но на деле это хороший, привлекающий внимание ход, не более. Однако, состав действительно отличный, увлажняющий, рабоч…
🔥19❤7🆒3
Signed Stranniza
Video, posted without a caption
🤩11
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @galkastranniza. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“КОСМЕТИКА РАБОТАЕТ” (@galkastranniza), 600 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/galkastranniza.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.