Whoa, what a surprise 👍

Channel
galaxy.ton
@galaxyton
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
140subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002238239195 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @galaxyton |
| Description | Gamefi ? Crypto ? Future? Dev. ? Ton? @punkion x.com/TggBarry |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/galaxyton |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:31 | 140 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:15 | 140 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 4 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 74
- Videos
- 4
- Links
- 43
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 9s
- Average length
- 9s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
112 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5224290720117962186 | 57 | 50.9% | |
| custom 5339351403624163425 | 21 | 18.8% | |
| custom 5274011327415730204 | 15 | 13.4% | |
| custom 5341778751636133111 | 13 | 11.6% | |
| custom 5332737497585696979 | 4 | 3.57% | |
| custom 5199929979147675963 | 2 | 1.79% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 112reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 May 2026 to 9 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @galaxyton. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 May 2026 to 9 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
🤖 The BotFather MiniApp has been updated on the production server. A new BotCloud feature has been added, although it is not yet available to all users. BotCloud will allow developers to create and run server-side Cloud Functions directly on Telegram's infrastructure. Instead of maintaining their own server or using webhooks, developers will be able to write JavaScript code in BotFather, and Telegram will execute it…
☠️ TON Great Dead Again дампы. пампы. взломы. угон pepe. для самого великого level 1 блокчейна всё это уже воспринимается как обычный вторник. ну привет. никогда такого не было, и вот опять. мы пережили tap to earn. подарки. мемы. sticker meta. теперь коллективно переживаем TON Great Again. только сама сеть всё ещё ощущается где то в 2023 году. Ethereum сегодня держит $39.1 млрд TVL. Solana почти $5 млрд. TON $71 …
What if AI reaches the point where it can redesign and improve itself without any human involvement? What if it eventually gains access to every piece of knowledge, every technology, and every system it needs to keep evolving? Do you think humanity would still be in control, or would AI become the driving force behind every company, startup, and technological breakthrough? At that point, who would really be shapin…
💎 Toncoin → Gram The rebranding is in progress 🔥
custom 53417787516361331115custom 53393514036241634253
Gram morning
custom 52242907201179621864custom 53417787516361331111
Now everyone can do some crazy, beautiful stuff in bots 🤘👷♂️👷♂️ 👷♂️👷♂️👷♂️
custom 52242907201179621864custom 53393514036241634253custom 53417787516361331111
New update for bots 😳
custom 52242907201179621864custom 53417787516361331111
Posted without readable text
custom 52242907201179621864custom 53417787516361331111
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 52242907201179621867
TON Connect v3. TON Connect получил крупное обновление с gasless-транзакциями, подключением и действием в один шаг, а также новыми инструментами для работы с жетонами и NFT. Подробнее про обновление Интро • 1 • 2 • 3 • Ещё TON Tech • 𝕏
custom 52740113274157302043custom 51999299791476759632custom 52242907201179621862custom 53417787516361331111
I need this 🤯
custom 52242907201179621864custom 52740113274157302043custom 53393514036241634251
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @galaxyton. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 913,581 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“galaxy.ton” (@galaxyton), 140 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/galaxyton.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.