Channel
@galaxy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
434subscribers
+18 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003779204875 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @galaxy |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/galaxy |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:07 | 434 | +11 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:43 | 423 | +7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:32 | 416 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:46 | 416 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (29 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,026 |
| Reactions total | 61 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 19:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
61 reactions across 16 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 15 | 24.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 9 | 14.8% | |
| ❤ | 8 | 13.1% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 8.20% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 8.20% | |
| 💘 | 4 | 6.56% | |
| 👾 | 3 | 4.92% | |
| 💋 | 3 | 4.92% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 4.92% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 3.28% | |
| 🦄 | 2 | 3.28% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 1.64% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 1.64% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 61reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
✨ One of James Webb’s Most Stunning Images: Planetary Nebula NGC 1514 The James Webb Space Telescope captured an extraordinary infrared view of NGC 1514, revealing intricate dust rings, hidden gaps, and showing that the bright central object is actually a pair of stars shaping the nebula.
❤2🦄2👾1
🔭 Hubble Captures Two Galaxy Clusters in the Middle of a Cosmic Collision Hubble observed the massive galaxy cluster CL0016+1609 (MACS J0018.5+1626), revealing that it is actually two galaxy clusters merging together. Although Hubble cannot see dark matter directly, astronomers used gravitational lensing to map its distribution and better understand how these colossal collisions shape the large-scale structure of t…
❤🔥1
🌕 A SpaceX Falcon 9 Rocket Is About to Crash Into the Moon NASA and SpaceX are tracking the Falcon 9 upper stage from the Blue Ghost 1 mission, which is expected to impact the Moon near the Einstein and Bell craters. The impact poses no danger to Earth, but it offers a rare scientific opportunity. NASA will study the new crater and the ejected dust to better understand the Moon’s surface and improve future impact mo…
⚡1
☀️ NASA Just Made Solar Storm Forecasts 10× More Accurate NASA’s PUNCH mission successfully predicted the arrival of a solar storm within 30 minutes—about 10 times more accurate than current forecasting methods. Using four spacecraft, PUNCH continuously tracks solar eruptions across the inner Solar System, capturing a new image every 4 minutes. This breakthrough could greatly improve warnings for satellites, power …
👀1
https://youtu.be/I29P2zHNGdI Skywatching Highlights Aug. 5: Last Quarter Moon Aug. 12: Total solar eclipse across northern Russia, Greenland, Iceland, northern Spain, and part of Portugal; partial eclipse in parts of the U.S.; New Moon Aug. 12-13: Perseid meteor shower peak under dark skies Aug. 14-16: Venus reaches greatest eastern elongation and shines low in the west after sunset Aug. 27-28: Partial lunar eclip…
👍1
NASA’s Chandra Finds Unexpected Fireworks in Aftermath of Stellar Explosions NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory found that several supernova remnants in galaxy M83 are changing in X-ray brightness instead of fading as expected. Scientists think the most likely cause is material from a surviving companion star falling onto a black hole or neutron star. Another possibility is that the compact object is pulling back debr…
❤4❤🔥1🔥1
🕸️The Universe Hid Its Biggest Secret… Until Scientists Asked a Slime Mold For decades, astronomers have searched for the Cosmic Web—the vast network of dark matter and faint hydrogen gas that connects galaxies across the Universe. But tracing it was nearly impossible because dark matter is invisible. Scientists found inspiration in slime mold, a single-celled organism that naturally builds the shortest and most eff…
👍3❤2💘2
🌌 The First 3D Map of Dark Matter Using nearly 1,000 hours of Hubble observations and 575 overlapping images, astronomers created the first three-dimensional map of dark matter across the universe. Built from the shapes of 500,000 distant galaxies, the map reveals that galaxies are not randomly scattered, but follow a vast Cosmic Web of dark matter filaments that has grown denser over billions of years under gravity.…
💘2🔥2🐳1👍1
💥 Four Galaxy Clusters in a Historic Collision This composite image of MACS J0717.5+3745 captures the first known collision of four galaxy clusters. Hubble reveals the galaxies, while Chandra X-ray Observatory shows the hot gas, with blue indicating the hottest gas and reddish-purple the coolest. Astronomers found that a 13-million-light-year-long filament of galaxies, gas, and dark matter is continuously feeding the…
👾2👍1
🕸️🕸️ The Universe Looks Like a Giant Spider Web Astronomers believe the early universe was almost perfectly smooth. Tiny differences in density gradually pulled in more matter through gravity, forming a vast Cosmic Web that resembles a giant spider web. Made mostly of dark matter, this enormous network of filaments forms the large-scale backbone of the universe today. This image combines 18 Hubble observations of the…
👍2💯1
✨ When Light Reveals the Invisible When V838 Monocerotis erupted in 2002, it became 600,000 times brighter than the Sun. Instead of a normal explosion, its light illuminated ancient clouds of dust, creating a breathtaking light echo that continues to reveal new cosmic structures years later. Credit: NASA
❤🔥2👍1
🌌 James Webb Reveals Centaurus A Like Never Before The James Webb Space Telescope captured one of the clearest infrared views of Centaurus A, exposing hidden dust lanes and the active heart of this galaxy in remarkable detail. Credit : NASA
💋3👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @galaxy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 770,966 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 46 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Galaxy” (@galaxy), 434 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/galaxy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.