Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Гаевой Александр

@gaevoi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

251subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002219937645
TypeChannel
Username@gaevoi
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/gaevoi

Growth

2518 Aug 2026, 23:30 — 251 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 13:11 — 251 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 23:309 Aug 2026, 13:11
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 250–252 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 13:11251no change
8 Aug 2026, 23:30251first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
129.1%
avg views ÷ 251 subscribers
Avg views / post
324
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.74%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held20 (5 April 20264 August 2026)
Views total972
Reactions total85
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 23:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

314 reactions across 20 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥11636.9%
👍319.87%
custom 5267082389821093853288.92%
278.60%
🕊257.96%
🤔123.82%
❤‍🔥92.87%
👏92.87%
🎉82.55%
🤮82.55%
🥱82.55%
61.91%
custom 517727867811083140530.955%
🏆30.955%
💩30.955%
🤡30.955%
🥰30.955%
👎20.637%
💯20.637%
😎20.637%
6 further kinds61.91%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 314reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 April 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @gaevoi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 April 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 14:40 UTC119 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🐍Теория стационарного бандита, агрессия предшествует легитимности Сегодня мне кажется важным обсудить один неочевидный вопрос — о природе власти и о том, как на самом деле возникают государства. Мы привыкли думать, что легитимность — это некий моральный фундамент, на котором строится любое принуждение, так называемый "общественный договор". Но что, если всё работает ровно наоборот? 🟡Одной из теорий, объясняющей пр

🔥8👍6🤔4👎1👏1🤡1🤣1😁1

1 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTC611 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🗳Участие в выборах легитимизирует власть? Такой вопрос, кажется, возникает каждые выборы. Хочу в этом посте разобрать фундаментальный вопрос — черпает ли власть легитимность из выборов? Для начала определимся с базой. Легитимность — это внутреннее согласие общества с правом власти на управление, готовность подчиняться её решениям не из страха наказания, а из убеждения, что эта власть «правильная», «справедливая» ил

🔥10🕊87👍1💯1

20 Jul 2026, 16:20 UTC242 views35 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @sar_yablokoPhoto

🍎 Завершаем подачу документов одномандатников Сегодня Александр Гаевой подал документы в Балаковский ТИК. Напомним, ранее документы для регистрации в одномандатных округах подали Сергей Любцов, Ксения Чернова и Кирилл Румянцев. Таким образом во всех четырёх округах Саратовской области будут представлены яблочники. 🤩Приводим комментарий Александра: Сегодня подал все необходимые документы в избирательную комиссию Бал

🕊15🔥8🏆3👍3👏3🤮3

9 Jul 2026, 16:51 UTC352 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026

💸Налог как утилитарное зло. Часть 1. Вредно ли облагать налогом бедных🤔 Копаясь в своих черновиках, я нашёл старое эссе. Перечитав его, я понял, что там прилично материала, и, если этот пост зайдёт, будут и другие части. 🤓Начнём с определений. Налог — это обязательный, безвозмездный платёж, взимаемый государством с физ. и юр. лиц для финансирования общественных функций и перераспределения ресурсов. Налоги традицион

🔥11👍5custom 52670823898210938534🤡1

26 Jun 2026, 11:05 UTC650 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026

1⃣0⃣ аргументов, к которым либертарианцу лучше быть готовым🐍 Как вы знаете, я часто хожу на дебаты и стараюсь к ним готовиться. Сегодня расскажу про 10 аргументов коммунистов, которые меня удивили, и контраргументы к ним. 1️⃣ В капитализме человек не владеет средствами производства. Как добиться успеха без ресурсов? 🔘Средства производства сегодня — это не только заводы, это знания, навыки, опыт. Современный рынок

🔥852👍2custom 51772786781108314052

14 Jun 2026, 10:21 UTC671 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🤩На стриме у Занозы!🐍 Сегодня, 14 июня, в 20:00 по МСК буду на стриме у Али Занозы - авторе ютуб канала "Сибирская ПолитТопка" Обсудим её книгу, "Пособие по рациональному эгоизму". Думаю, будет интересно. 🔜 Ссылка на стрим

🔥7🎉3👍3🥱2👻1

13 Jun 2026, 11:08 UTC422 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Возвращаюсь в канал🎉 В последнее время немного перегорел: хотелось отдохнуть, а консервов, которые обычно делаю на такой случай, не было. По-тихоньку буду возвращаться с постами. Зато успел перелопатить свои старые эссе. Дописал художественное произведение, которое начал ещё в новогодние праздники 2022 года. 🍎На прошлой неделе, в выходные, прошёл ЯблокоVolgaCamp. Про него я был наслышан, но в этом году впервые был

🔥12🤮5custom 52670823898210938533💩2🕊2❤‍🔥1

22 May 2026, 14:24 UTC999 views18 reactions3 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

«Пособие по рациональному эгоизму» – книга о глубокой рефлексии📒 Месяц назад мне подарили книжку Али Занозы. На днях я её дочитал и хочу поделиться впечатлениями. Название интригует и настраивает на лад, будто сейчас нам раскроют тайны мироздания. Но с первых страниц становится понятно: здесь нет наглядного пособия, лишь глубокая рефлексия автора, как она формировала своё мировоззрение. Я ожидал другого формата, н

7custom 52670823898210938533🤔2🥱21👍1🔥1🤡1

18 May 2026, 07:12 UTC349 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @gamechangers_societyPhoto

В воскресенье, 10 мая, состоялись дебаты между старейшинами нашего чата: либертарианцем Александром Гаевым и коммунисткой Полиной (Аконит) под руководством нашего бессменного модератора Александра Емельянова. Запись дебатов вы можете посмотреть на нашем YouTube по ссылке: https://youtu.be/gUMrlq_hXvY Приносим свои извинения, за небольшую техническую накладку в начале записи. Также предлагаем внести соревновательный

👍7😎21🤷‍♂1

14 May 2026, 07:21 UTC390 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Выбор темы длинного поста. 🗳Побеждает вариант с наибольшим числом голосов (Можно выбрать несколько вариантов ответа). Подробные правила в закрепе. 📌

  1. Интернет регуляции, глобальный тренд или временная паника? (Неизбежны ли?) 🤖26%
  2. Либертарианцы и участие в политике (Расскажу о дискуссии внутри Либертарианства на этот счёт) 🗳45%
  3. Ли Куан Ю и его политика. (Модернизация без политической конкуренции?) 🤔18%
  4. Монопартийная демократия в Японии. (Как одна партия выигрывает выборы пол века?) 🇯🇵26%
  5. Моё отношение к ФАС. (Нужна ли рынку вообще Антимонопольная служба и почему?) 👀55%
  6. 10 аргументов к которым либертарианцу лучше быть готовым. (Конраргументы в дебатах с коммунистами)74%

The shares total 244%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

🔥5🥱4👏2

13 May 2026, 10:02 UTC406 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Что такое Минархизм? Стремление к недостижимому идеалу🐍 🤩Я минархист, об этом говорю ни чуть не реже чем о том что я Либертарианец. Для одних минархизм – это неправильное либертарианство, для других – его умеренная форма, для третих — утопия. Но что я сам вкладываю в это понятие? 🔘Минархизм – минархическое либертарианское течение, признающее невозможность полного демонтажа государства. Минархисты выступают за макси

custom 52670823898210938537🔥42🤔2👎1

7 May 2026, 08:50 UTC292 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @gamechangers_societyPhoto

Дебаты «Частная собственность — друг или враг свободы личности?» Вопрос о собственности сопровождает политическую мысль столетиями: от Локка и Руссо до современных дискуссий о неравенстве и цифровых правах. Что стоит за правом владеть — гарантия автономии человека или механизм его подчинения? Где проходит граница между личной вещью и средством производства, и кто имеет право эту границу проводить? 🐍 Александр - Либ

🔥8🎉3custom 52670823898210938533💩1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @gaevoi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

14 May 2026, 07:21 UTCFinal Results38 voters

Выбор темы длинного поста. 🗳Побеждает вариант с наибольшим числом голосов (Можно выбрать несколько вариантов ответа). Подробные правила в закрепе. 📌

  1. Интернет регуляции, глобальный тренд или временная паника? (Неизбежны ли?) 🤖26%
  2. Либертарианцы и участие в политике (Расскажу о дискуссии внутри Либертарианства на этот счёт) 🗳45%
  3. Ли Куан Ю и его политика. (Модернизация без политической конкуренции?) 🤔18%
  4. Монопартийная демократия в Японии. (Как одна партия выигрывает выборы пол века?) 🇯🇵26%
  5. Моё отношение к ФАС. (Нужна ли рынку вообще Антимонопольная служба и почему?) 👀55%
  6. 10 аргументов к которым либертарианцу лучше быть готовым. (Конраргументы в дебатах с коммунистами)74%

The shares total 244%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

11 Apr 2026, 09:21 UTCFinal Results36 voters

Голосование за тему длинного поста.

  1. Интернет регуляции, глобальный тренд или временная паника? (Государства регулируют интернет)🤖47%
  2. Ли Куан Ю и его политика. Модернизация без политической конкуренции? (Независимый Сингапур) 🤑42%
  3. Мой политический активизм. (Что я понял и какие правила для себя установил?) 🤩19%
  4. Монопартийная демократия в Японии (Как одна партия правит страной пол века?) 🇯🇵39%
  5. Безусловный базовый доход: более рыночная социалка? (Либертарианский взгляд и аргументы) 💵50%
  6. Либертарианцы и участие в политике. (Расскажу о дискуссии внутри Либертарианства на этот счёт)42%

The shares total 239%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 April 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 743,922 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Гаевой Александр” (@gaevoi), 251 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gaevoi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.