#ReviveToIVE

Channel
GAERIOUS. ✶
@gaerious
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
273subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002423096610 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gaerious |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gaerious |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:21 | 273 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:16 | 273 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 23 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 19s
- Average length
- 10s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
35 reactions across 4 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 15 | 42.9% | |
| 💋 | 5 | 14.3% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 11.4% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 8.57% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 5.71% | |
| 🐳 | 2 | 5.71% | |
| 💘 | 2 | 5.71% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 2.86% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 2.86% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2025 to 21 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
★ PREDISPOSED (+04-107-01.) ▓▓ Cospirotial daydreaming, Buoyant sanctum. Amid the darknest oddity, bringing a sense / Settle a pavements in deliquesce: Lacquered vacancies, Where starlets was bruishes around their soul. ✺ DEVOTION / RHYME / 0:3 Coming back, Rounding this world. #ReviveToIVE Ive, Grows as the forementioned a glams. On today (23/02/2026.) Prolonging with a reticence cradle: …
Happy birthday, dearest Kim Gaeul! ❤️
Sticker, posted without a caption
ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐜𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐦𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐨 𝐚𝐥𝐥: 𝐇𝐞𝐫 ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ𝐌𝐚𝐣𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐲’𝐬 𝟐𝟒𝐭𝐡 ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧, 𝐛𝐨𝐫𝐧 𝐨𝐟 ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ𝐚𝐮𝐭𝐮𝐦𝐧’𝐬 𝐰𝐚𝐫𝐦𝐭𝐡 ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ∘ ───♡༉─── ∘ Unto the Right Honourable Duke and Duchess, ── .✦ Upon the four and twentieth jubilee, Her Majesty the Enchantress was ushered into this mortal realm, swathed in the resplendent warmth of autumn’s eternal memory, as though the crown of the season itself did cradle her nativity.✧˖°. Hear ye! With the En…
❤4🐳2⚡1💋1
⌗ 𝐋𝐄𝐓 𝐁𝐄 𝐈𝐓 𝐊𝐍𝐎𝐖𝐍: 𝐇𝐞𝐫 𝐌𝐚𝐣𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐲’𝐬 𝟐𝟒𝐭𝐡 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧; 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐰𝐡𝐨𝐥𝐞 𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐝𝐨𝐦 𝐢𝐬 𝐜𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐝. ୭ ˚. ᵎᵎ By decree of the Crown, let all loyal denizens of the realm be summoned to joyous revelry, bearing the token of attendance, #23GaeulKeeps upon 24th of September, beneath the wondrous boughs of the enchanted maple, where mirth and festivity shall abound. ꪆৎ By our sovereign voice, we, the Enchantress of this realm, do hereby pr…
❤7💋4🏆1💘1💯1
Sticker, posted without a caption
ANNOUNCEMENT. Due to our personal reason, we would like to announce that we have to stop our subscribe-for-subscribe things. Matters concerning SFS before this announcement is issued will be resolved as soon as possible. Thank you for your understanding. XOXZ, GAERIOUS.
Sticker, posted without a caption
Stream XOXZ!
Sticker, posted without a caption
˖ ⊹ ♬˚₊‧
🔥4⚡2❤🔥2❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @gaerious. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 706,399 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@CampOfLachers · 6,7411 postFORIVEVER. #IVEIntoDreams.
@forIvever · 581 postUnheartly Sheen: REIZZM.
@Reizzm · 8391 postTHE FUEL, @rJakeh: CLOSE BENERAN
@rJakeh · 4641 postSOLVREITH FAMILY. ⚔️
@SOLVREITH · 2,9061 postMonster University: ENVERIOUS.
@TheEnverious · 1,7521 postProdigious Corsair Kin: THE VANSENTS
@TheVansents · 4,7091 postDISBAND
@twesive · 3801 postSURE(V)iVE
@WeSUREVIVE · 3001 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@gaerious named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GAERIOUS. ✶” (@gaerious), 273 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gaerious.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.