Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for NFT | dake

Channel

NFT | dake

@gabitovd

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Cite this entry

483subscribers

-13 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002546414400
TypeChannel
Username@gabitovd
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/gabitovd

Growth

4824964897 August 2026 — 496 subscribers8 August 2026 — 496 subscribers15 August 2026 — 488 subscribers21 August 2026 — 482 subscribers28 August 2026 — 483 subscribers4837 August 202628 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 21 days, net -13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 480–498 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 06:07483+1
21 Aug 2026, 15:17482-6
15 Aug 2026, 07:55488-8
8 Aug 2026, 04:19496no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:05496first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 31 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

111 reactions across 16 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2825.2%
👍1816.2%
🔥1715.3%
🥰1513.5%
😁109.01%
❤‍🔥87.21%
🕊65.41%
🤩43.60%
👏21.80%
😭21.80%
👀10.901%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 111reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 August 2025 to 6 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 20 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @gabitovd. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 August 2025 to 6 September 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Sept 2025, 08:29 UTC387 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Дуров подарил 🎁и 🎁юзеру у которого случился баг! — Недавно был баг из за которого один тип продал пепе за 1200 звезд и дуров решил вернуть потерю 🫡

🔥6👍2👏2🤩1

5 Sept 2025, 10:24 UTC414 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ситуация на рынке следующая: Лидеры роста : Kissed Frog 🎁 - +20.99% и итог флор 33.55❤️ Jolly Chimp🎁 - +14.81% и итог флор 3.72❤️

👍4

4 Sept 2025, 09:03 UTC381 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

✈️Павел Дуров только что купил 5 🎁Plush Pepe за 37 288❤️ 📶Все 5 Pepe Павел вывел на свой telegram аккаунт! И создал первую коллекцию подарков «Pepskie» 🎁В коллекции находится 11 Plush Pepe, коллекция пока что скрыта! Может отдаст одну пепку, челу который потерял её на маркете?🤔

4 Sept 2025, 07:58 UTC113 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Доброе утро! 🤑Рlush Pepe за сегодня показали неплохой рост. В остальном рынок подарков особо не двигается🤔

3 Sept 2025, 11:44 UTC411 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

✈️Баг telegram маркета Пользователь продал 🎁Plush Pepe за 1 500⭐️/$22 в Telegram маркете Пользователь изменял цену на выставленные Moon Pendant с 1 700⭐️ до 1 500⭐️, но вместо Moon Pendant в продаже за 1 500⭐️ оказалась Plush Pepe 🤷После покупки Plush Pepe каким-то магическим образом не получила 21-дневный трейд-бан, и её сразу же перепродали на 🖼Portals за 4 100

1 Sept 2025, 18:10 UTC162 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Дуров подарил книгу своей девушке 🎁

🤩3

1 Sept 2025, 08:01 UTC482 views15 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Доброе утро! 🤑Рынок подарков сегодня преимущественно падает, вышли новые подарки. Как вам⁉️

10👍4👀1

31 Aug 2025, 23:41 UTC677 views7 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Улучшение на кнопку 🎁

🥰7

31 Aug 2025, 22:38 UTC538 views8 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Подарки не вышли Павел опять лоханул нас😏

6😁2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @gabitovd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“NFT | dake” (@gabitovd), 483 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gabitovd.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.