Channel
@fx_behdark
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
206subscribers
+24 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003834017714 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fx_behdark |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 28 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fx_behdark |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 206 | +19 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:05 | 187 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:25 | 187 | +5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:45 | 182 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (28 May 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,554 |
| Reactions total | 43 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
106 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 68 | 64.2% | |
| 🔥 | 18 | 17.0% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 10.4% | |
| 🙏 | 5 | 4.72% | |
| 💋 | 2 | 1.89% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.943% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.943% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 106reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🕯 #GBPUSD analysis (30M) A double zigzag pattern is forming on the Pound and appears to be nearing completion. It is expected that the second part of this double pattern will develop into a triangle. If this scenario plays out, the price could drop, or we can consider entering a short position with proper risk management. Stick to your stop loss. Take partial profits at the first target. Let's see what happens. …
❤1👍1
✔️ #XAUUSD analysis (1D) Update From the highlighted green demand zone, the price pumped more than 9% 🔼 following the path we had mapped out. 🔗 @FX_Behdark
❤4🔥4
✔️ #SANDISK analysis (12H) Update According to the previous plan, after reaching the first target, Wave F was completed, and the price dropped to begin Wave G 🔗 @FX_Behdark
❤2
✔️ #GBPUSD analysis (8H) Update The price found support in the highlighted green zone and successfully reached the first target🔼 🔗 @FX_Behdark
❤2👍2
✔️ #UKOIL analysis (12H) Update The price has dropped more than 19%🔽 from the highlighted supply zone. 🔗 @FX_Behdark
❤2🔥2🙏1
🕯 #SANDISK analysis (12H) From the point where we placed the red arrow on the chart, SANDISK appears to have entered a corrective phase. Based on the current price structure, this correction is most likely unfolding as a Diametric pattern, with the market currently trading in wave F of that formation. If this count is correct, one final bearish wave is still expected after the completion of wave F before the entire…
🔥2❤1
🕯 #UKOIL analysis (1D) Since we placed the red arrow on the chart, Brent crude oil has entered a corrective phase. The correction appears to be forming a triangle, and Wave D now looks complete. Wave D was bullish. Wave E now appears to be underway, and in this triangle, Wave E is expected to be bearish. From the green zone, Brent crude oil could turn bullish again. Let's see how it develops. For now, this is ou…
❤6🔥3
✔️ #USDJPY analysis (1H) Update Wave G has begun, and the price pumped from the highlighted green zone, successfully reaching the first target. 🔗 @FX_Behdark
❤6
✔️ #GBPUSD analysis (8H) Update Although the price fell just short of the green zone, the bullish outlook on GBP played out as expected, with the price reaching the second target. 🔗 @FX_Behdark
❤4
🕯 #USDJPY analysis (1H) Since the point marked by the red arrow on the chart, a corrective structure has developed. The price appears to be forming an ABC pattern, with Wave B taking the shape of a bullish Zigzag Diametric. This ABC is expected to evolve into a Flat pattern. As long as the green zone holds, the price may continue toward the targets marked on the chart. Be sure to take partial profits at the first …
❤2
🕯 #GBPUSD analysis (8H) On the chart, it appears that a Broadening pattern has been completed. The final wave of this Broadening pattern, Wave E, has ended, and the trendline has also been broken. It is expected that as long as the green zone holds, the price will move toward the targets marked on the chart. The targets are marked on the chart. Move your stop loss to breakeven at the first target. A daily candle …
💋2🙏2❤1
🕯 #EURUSD analysis (2H) It appears that Wave E of a larger pattern has started, which is a bearish wave. A trendline has been lost, and it seems that sellers have entered the market. The price is currently pulling back toward the supply zone and the trendlines. It is expected that after this pullback, the price will continue moving downward. The targets are marked on the chart. Move your stop loss to breakeven at…
❤3👍2👎1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @fx_behdark. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 929,022 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BehDark (Forex)” (@fx_behdark), 206 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fx_behdark.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.