VIP Client from ๐ฉ๐ฐ DENMARK has submitted us a valued review!

Channel
๐๐๐ป๐๐๐๐๐๐๐.๐๐๐ ๐ป๐ฌ๐บ๐ป๐ฐ๐ด๐ถ๐ต๐ฐ๐จ๐ณ๐บ
@fxTsignalsTestimonials
On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry
34subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001289060032 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fxTsignalsTestimonials |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fxTsignalsTestimonials |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 14:27 | 34 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 33 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:16 | 34 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:52 | 34 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 11 February 2025 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
45 reactions across 9 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ๐ | 14 | 31.1% | |
| ๐ฅ | 11 | 24.4% | |
| ๐ | 9 | 20.0% | |
| โค | 7 | 15.6% | |
| ๐ฅฐ | 3 | 6.67% | |
| ๐คฏ | 1 | 2.22% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 45reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 February 2025 to 30 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Valued review from our VIP client!
VIP Signals and Copy Trading Client from ๐จ๐ฆ Canada has submitted his review again!
Photo, posted without a caption
VIP Client from ๐ฆ๐บ Australia's Feedback
One of the OLD Copy Trading Investors from Canada ๐จ๐ฆ has submitted his review โ
๐ Client from ๐ธ๐ฆ SAUDI ARABIA has submitted his valued feedback
VIP Signals & Copy Trading Client's Feedback after 90% Gain ๐ฎ
Photo, posted without a caption
๐2๐ฅ1๐ฅฐ1
VIP signals and copy trading client's feedback
VIP copy trading client's feedback
VIP Copy Trading Client from CANADA Trust our service from the beginning ๐
๐2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @fxTsignalsTestimonials. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank โ 1,358,536 of 1,621,120entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@fxTsignalscomRealClients ยท 599 posts๐๐๐ป๐๐๐๐๐๐๐.๐๐๐ ๐พ๐ฌ๐ฉ๐บ๐ฐ๐ป๐ฌ ๐
@fxTsignalscomWEBSITE ยท 1061 post๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐น ๐ฃ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐๐ป - ๐๐ผ๐ฝ๐ ๐ง๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ป๐ด
@fxtsignalsperformance ยท 631 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐๐๐ป๐๐๐๐๐๐๐.๐๐๐ ๐ป๐ฌ๐บ๐ป๐ฐ๐ด๐ถ๐ต๐ฐ๐จ๐ณ๐บโ (@fxTsignalsTestimonials), 34 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fxTsignalsTestimonials.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.