Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

егор ультимативное богатство

@fwecrypto

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

749subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002087989975
TypeChannel
Username@fwecrypto
Descriptiondirect — @fakewhoever щитпост — @ultimativshitpost софты — @fwesoft
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/fwecrypto

Growth

7497 Aug 2026, 07:18 — 749 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 07:31 — 749 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 07:187 Aug 2026, 07:31
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 748–750 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 07:31749no change
7 Aug 2026, 07:18749first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 22 July 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
17
Videos
2
Links
27

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

404 reactions across 16 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤡11628.7%
9323.0%
👍6816.8%
🔥348.42%
🙏256.19%
😁133.22%
👏122.97%
❤‍🔥112.72%
🤔51.24%
🌭40.99%
🐳40.99%
😍30.743%
😢30.743%
🤯30.743%
🦄30.743%
20.495%
🏆10.248%
💩10.248%
😨10.248%
😱10.248%
1 further kind10.248%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 404reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2024 to 8 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
105
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 19 we hold a reading for · 53%
Most on one post
34
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fwecrypto. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2024 to 8 January 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Jan 2026, 16:29 UTC≈1,020 viewsread 7 August 2026

где купить фейсбуки копеечные за 5 рублей 😭😭😭 нужно буквально одну привязку сделать секундную и больше акк не нужен

13 Dec 2025, 11:45 UTC≈1,420 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Скоро буду рассматривать заявки! На скрине стата с моего нулевого акка твиттера Чем больше заряженных людей с норм акками будет, тем сильнее мы будем расти!

12 Dec 2025, 19:20 UTC962 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Если кто-то пропустил напоминаю

😁3

12 Dec 2025, 12:03 UTC≈1,380 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Всем приветик! Давно не слышались В общем сразу к делу, вы наверняка видели, как ZSC DAO созданное вот этим мужичком, буквально захватило крипто-твиттер по полимаркету и это мощнейший пример того, как слаженная команда может доминировать в нише Меня дорога повела немного другим путем и я веду твиттер по Base экосистеме, и как оказалось подобных дао по Бейзу либо нет, либо я о них не слышал, поэтому что? Правильно!

🙏4

19 Apr 2025, 13:21 UTC≈3,110 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Hello, world! Я решил больше постить в мейн паблик и разделить инфлюенсерство с софтами, поэтому создал новый канал, который будет направлен на эту сторону моей деятельности Буду дропать туда фри софты, анонсы платных софтов, можете предлагать свои идеи, вполне возможно я их реализую — канал Чат | Связаться | Щитпост | Софты

3

11 Apr 2025, 07:26 UTC≈3,700 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

zero stressing, only finessing кровь на рынке льётся, но эта информация никак не поможет, если денег нет, как и не было. ретро, для меня, остается той ставкой, при которой можно с мин. вложениями постараться выжить макс. reward «а если сменится перспектива? а если сбреют? а то? а если это?» — чтожь… at least I/we tried раз ты нищий у тебя нет выбора, кроме как попытаться, ибо ты нихуя не теряешь, а все сомнения — э

19🙏5🌭4👍2🔥1

8 Feb 2025, 11:57 UTC≈4,190 views139 reactions34 Starsread 7 August 2026

SocialFi НА КОЛЕНИ, НА КОЛЕНИ 😳 Lens Protocol — строят свою экосистему, фаундер Stani (он же фаундер Aave, самого большого по TVL Lending протокола, то есть денег много), уже раздавали когда-то дроп за активность в их приложении ORB, скоро переход на ZkSync (Q1), запустили недавно тестнет и тд Чуть подробнее можно прочитать в недавнем посте, в котором упомянул Lens и софт на него, на тот момент софт был готов на 80

🤡11617🔥6

5 Feb 2025, 20:51 UTC≈2,400 views32 reactions13 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Добрейший вечерочек, с вами единственный и неповторимый Егор, который, по совместительству, ультимативное богатство Рынок не радует, гемов или вовсе нет или мало, а ртов стало слишком много, прокормить всех очевидно не получится, но идеи появляются, а будут ли они прибыльными узнаем только через время. Итак делюсь идеями, что отработал/отрабатываю: 1. Делал мувмент, совсем скоро мейнет и я совместно с Дмитрием Бозз

🙏1611🔥5

20 Dec 2024, 09:07 UTC≈4,430 views32 reactions33 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Всем гудморнинг падпищеки, значит, рассказываю: Недавно Lens Protocol (о котором уже упоминалось) подняли 31 лям доляров, все побежали скупать профиля, на вторичке они выросли до ~1.5$ (кол был когда стоили 0.05$, фомо), их можно как-то продать, но в подробности я не вдавался, мне в падлу — я кручу ретрадропек! Ленс скоро будут переходить на zk, будет использовать свою надстройку Lens Network, будут маленькие комис

👍206🔥42

12 Dec 2024, 06:37 UTC≈2,650 views20 reactions12 Starsread 7 August 2026
Video

Meteora — отработка на примере $JUP 🤓 Про инструменты и проект рассказывал в посте. Для начала немного по проекту: Недавно выходили токены по типу Trump, на которых некоторые сделали лайфчейндж, в том числе и на метеоре, ввиду чего появилось мнение, что поинты сильно размыло, но в любом случае активных пользователей с правильной стратегией остается немного + проект остается хорошим инструментом для заработка. Тепе

👍10🐳4🔥42

9 Nov 2024, 16:20 UTC≈2,220 views15 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ultimativshitpost

новый ролек!!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQfWlZ9R7GA всем смотреть очень важна, а еще подпишитесь на щитпост Чат | Личка | Щитпост

11😁3😨1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @fwecrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 124,735 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“егор ультимативное богатство” (@fwecrypto), 749 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fwecrypto.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.