Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for переход.

Channel

переход.

@furiaxginw

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

9subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002111361216
TypeChannel
Username@furiaxginw
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 6 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/furiaxginw

Growth

914 Aug 2026, 19:26 — 9 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 19:31 — 9 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 19:2614 Aug 2026, 19:31
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8–10 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 19:319no change
14 Aug 2026, 19:269first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 6 May 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
87
Links
7

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

128 reactions across 5 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥3225.0%
2620.3%
💋1713.3%
❤‍🔥1612.5%
custom 54427055567646453771410.9%
💯107.81%
custom 529398489243715438864.69%
🍓32.34%
💊21.56%
💔21.56%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 128reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2024 to 1 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Oct 2025, 11:07 UTC21 views1 reactionsread 14 August 2026

кто-то живой есть?

🔥1

Signed 𝓪𝓷𝓪𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓼𝓲𝓪

16 May 2024, 04:16 UTC457 views46 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

— 𝑪𝑶𝑹𝑹𝑬𝑺𝑷𝑶𝑵𝑫𝑬𝑵𝑪𝑬 𝑹𝑶𝑵 𝑨𝑵𝑫 𝑮𝑰𝑵𝑵𝒀. — однажды маленькая девочка спросила старшего брата: что такое любовь? он ответил: это когда ты каждый день воруешь у меня из портфеля шоколад… а я продолжаю класть его в одно и тоже место… рона и джинни можно описать именно так, ведь их взаимодействиям можно позавидовать. они любят друг друга, но при этом не упускают возможность абьюзить и смеяться друг с другом. #вудиперсинашипапы.

13🔥12❤‍🔥8💋6💔2💯2custom 54427055567646453772🍓1

Signed — 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐝𝐨𝐧.

14 May 2024, 17:42 UTC348 views22 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

— 𝑪𝑶𝑵𝑵𝑬𝑪𝑻𝑰𝑶𝑵𝑺 𝑳𝑰𝑺𝑻 𝑮𝑰𝑵𝑵𝒀 𝑾𝑬𝑨𝑺𝑳𝑬𝒀. 𝒀𝑶𝑼 𝑨𝑹𝑬 𝑻𝑯𝑬 𝑶𝑵𝑬 𝑾𝑯𝑶 𝑪𝑨𝑵 𝑩𝑬𝑪𝑶𝑴𝑬 𝑯𝑬𝑹 𝑭𝑹𝑰𝑬𝑵𝑫 𝑶𝑹 𝑭𝑨𝑴𝑰𝑳𝒀. — 𝑷𝑨𝑵𝑺𝒀 𝑷𝑨𝑹𝑲𝑰𝑵𝑺𝑶𝑵. — 𝑫𝑹𝑨𝑪𝑶 𝑴𝑨𝑳𝑭𝑶𝒀. — 𝑹𝑶𝑵 𝑾𝑬𝑨𝑺𝑳𝑬𝒀. — 𝑭𝑹𝑬𝑫 𝑾𝑬𝑨𝑺𝑳𝑬𝒀. — 𝑶𝑳𝑰𝑽𝑰𝑨 𝑾𝑶𝑶𝑫. — 𝑨𝑺𝑻𝑶𝑹𝑰𝑨 𝑮𝑹𝑬𝑬𝑵𝑮𝑹𝑨𝑺𝑺. — 𝑫𝑨𝑷𝑯𝑵𝑬 𝑮𝑹𝑬𝑬𝑵𝑮𝑹𝑨𝑺𝑺. — 𝑩𝑨𝑹𝑻𝒀 𝑪𝑹𝑶𝑼𝑪𝑯. — 𝒁𝑯𝑶𝑼 𝑪𝑯𝑨𝑵𝑮. — 𝑱𝑬𝑵𝑵𝑰𝑭𝑬𝑹 𝑭𝑶𝑺𝑻𝑬𝑹. — 𝑻𝑯𝑬𝑶𝑫𝑶𝑹𝑬 𝑵𝑶𝑻𝑻. — 𝑳𝑰𝑳𝑼 𝑱𝑨𝑵𝑬. — 𝑨𝑵𝑻𝑯𝑶𝑵𝒀 𝑷𝑨𝑹𝑲𝑰𝑵𝑺𝑶𝑵. — 𝑯𝑬𝑹𝑴𝑰𝑶𝑵𝑬 𝑮𝑹𝑨𝑵𝑮𝑬𝑹 — если желаете вести взаимодействие со мной, то жду юз вашего дневника в комментариях и

❤‍🔥6💋65🔥2custom 54427055567646453772custom 52939848924371543881

Signed — 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐝𝐨𝐧.

13 May 2024, 09:37 UTC228 views14 reactionsread 14 August 2026

любовь это — когда из миллионов джинь выбирают именно тебя одну.

8🍓2💯2💋1custom 54427055567646453771

Signed — 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐝𝐨𝐧.

6 May 2024, 11:03 UTC386 views45 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

— 𝑾𝑯𝑨𝑻 𝑨 𝑷𝑹𝑰𝑵𝑪𝑬𝑺𝑺 𝑳𝑰𝑬𝑺 𝑰𝑵 𝑻𝑯𝑬 𝑮𝑬𝑵𝑰𝑬. 𝑾𝑬𝑨𝑺𝑳𝑬𝒀 𝑨𝑪𝑪𝑶𝑹𝑫𝑰𝑵𝑮 𝑻𝑶 𝑻𝑯𝑬 𝑻𝑬𝑺𝑻? — 𝑴𝑼𝑳𝑨𝑵 — мулан — мне кажется,почти все, кто любил эту принцессу, по итогу стали либо бисексуальными, либо гомосексуальными. вы сильны физически и умственно. на первый взгляд вы кажетесь серьёзными, но на самом деле вы можете быть весёлыми. среди ваших друзей, наверное, много парней. занимаетесь спортом. очень любите свою семью и готовы пойти на ж

🔥17custom 54427055567646453779💯6custom 52939848924371543885💋4❤‍🔥2💊2

Signed — 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐝𝐨𝐧.

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @furiaxginw. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,466,706 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“переход.” (@furiaxginw), 9 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/furiaxginw.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.