Channel
@funeff
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
183subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001778154341 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @funeff |
| Description | Легендарный @golyashev Стратег ✅ Выращиваю компании и команды В канале пишу про кейсы, клиентов и мой путь к изобилию и гармонии 😎❤️ |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/funeff |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:02 | 183 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:55 | 183 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 6 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
68 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 28 | 41.2% | |
| ❤ | 21 | 30.9% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 11.8% | |
| 🤩 | 5 | 7.35% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 4.41% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 4.41% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 68reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 6 September 2025 to 24 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @funeff. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 September 2025 to 24 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Причины не важны. Просто вдумайтесь. Причина отвечает на вопрос «почему?», а он нужен только для наказаний и страданий. Для жизни нужен вопрос «зачем?» Он смотрит в будущее и наполняет смыслом намерения и дела 🔥
❤5
Для тех кто пропустил прямой эфир, можно посмотреть в записи) если будут вопросы, пишите
📞ФЦ БАС на «Серебряном дожде»: о самом актуальном в мире беспилотников Заместитель генерального директора АНО «ФЦ БАС» Александр Голяшев стал гостем программы Виктора Набутова «Набутов здесь» на радиостанции «Серебряный дождь». ✈️Эфир был посвящен одной из наиболее интересных и актуальных тем — сценариям применения беспилотных систем. Мы обсудили, как беспилотники меняют нашу повседневную жизнь и какие возможности …
🔥3
Первый опыт на радио) Интересно! Набутов классный) Можно было и часа два говорить
🔥5❤1
Всем привет! Я сегодня в 10:30 мск в прямом эфире радио Серебряный дождь) расскажу про гражданские беспилотники и свою нынешнюю работу, подключайтесь https://www.silver.ru/live_air/
🔥3❤1
Всё, отставляю в сторону мысли написать тут сегодня что-то рабочее. Нашей семье 14 лет! Что-то выросло 😊 И, по-моему, неплохо получилось))
❤10🔥6🥰3👍1
Минстрой России: пути внедрения беспилотных авиационных систем в строительстве и ЖКХ 👨👩👦В Министерстве строительства и жилищно-коммунального хозяйства Российской Федерации состоялось заседание подгруппы под председательством заместителя министра Константина Михайлика. На встрече состоялась презентация результатов деятельности рабочей группы, представленная заместителем генерального директора ФЦ БАС Александром Гол…
👍3🔥3❤2
На выходных разберу фотки и напишу свои впечатления. Спойлер: впечатления очень разные
ФЦ БАС на форуме «Крылья Сахалина»: обсуждение будущего беспилотных систем В Южно-Сахалинске завершился Международный форум беспилотных аппаратов всех сред «Крылья Сахалина». Эксперты обсудили вопросы расширения применения беспилотных технологий в воздухе, на земле и на воде, а также в космосе. ФЦ БАС принял участие в работе форума, представив свою экспертизу и видение развития отрасли. Представители Федерального ц…
👍4
О выгодах применения БАС. ☝ На прошедшем недавно форуме "Крылья Сахалина" ФЦ БАС представил доклад о сценариях применения беспилотных аппаратов всех сред, в котором замгендиректора центра Александр Голяшев красочно описал все выгоды от их внедрения. На слайдах большой упор сделан на сельское хозяйство, но плюсы обещают всем. Например: 📌 в лесном хозяйстве: на 40% снижение затрат на таксацию и снижение в три раза…
Не успеваю сам писать, спасибо профильным сми за внимание и поддержку)
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥8🤩5🕊3❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @funeff. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Легендарный ГÓЛЯШЕВ 🔥 Стратегии на Ярд 🚀” (@funeff), 183 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/funeff.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.