Channel
@fundedxscam
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
245subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002532556095 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fundedxscam |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fundedxscam |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 04:35 | 245 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 22:54 | 246 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:06 | 248 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:01 | 248 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 4 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
TRUSTED PROP FIRMS LIST All of the information below is based on my own experience. 1) Sway funded - prop firm based on regulated brokerage. Nothing else to say, as this is the future of prop trading. Prices are higher than on regular prop firms, but you get high quality service with no payout denials, fast payouts etc. I highly recommend to purchase only balance/equity based drawdown. Even I found it hard to pass …
Funded’X scammed with the payout, breached the account too 🤣 guess I’ll have to be completely transparent and tell whole story later as this is not the only issue that I faced Wanted to believe they’re good, even created this channel But all reviews on trustpilot are 100% true Stay away from this prop firm ❌
Will update on Sunday just to make sure that I’m not wrong
This is really funny because prop firm been asking me to test them for 2 months in a row 🤣
I give 99.9% that there will be no payout Will come in a week max with the update
No update on the payout yet guys
TPs were hit +70-30 pips from different entries
Hope you managed to add more lots at the lows 🤑🤑🤑
P.S. I’m trading only my real accounts, funded is not traded, I’ve hit my target
Still holding to this area, even added some more lots at the bottom 1.153 is the min area where I’m going to close
If you want to catch 20-30 pips trade, long EURUSD
If everything’s good with the payout, I’ll make a YouTube video with all trades breakdown
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @fundedxscam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 452,306 of 1,584,733entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FundedX funded account (scam)” (@fundedxscam), 245 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fundedxscam.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.