$link to multi millions 0xe6864e4630D4d7A0cAd2E61f6BC2C0dcAD777712

Channel
FullSend Gambles π€«
@fullsendrecords
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
117subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001750036609 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fullsendrecords |
| Description | Owner: @fullsender |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fullsendrecords |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:01 | 117 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:41 | 117 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 16 October 2024 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 12
- Videos
- 2
- Links
- 21
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 9 August 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramβs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 38s
- Average length
- 19s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
Reaction mix
3 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 2 | 66.7% | |
| π₯ | 1 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 16 October 2024 to 15 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
$link looks good here 220k mcap https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x835e4B15d72029866108393F1BbCb34D7Bc04399
https://x.com/cryptofullsendr/status/2012574197546152321?s=46
hearing that $ENX might be the next 100m runner on eth @engma_io $AVICI vibes https://x.com/cryptofullsendr/status/1994605306463351108?s=46
This has been one of the roughest cycles Iβve seen, yet there are always pockets of opportunity no matter how wild the market gets. The market thrives on proving the majority wrong. Ignore the crowd, form your own conviction, and trade it. https://x.com/cryptofullsendr/status/1988815577448869917?s=46
$KEK is up over 40% in the last 24 hours How much higher do you think this goes when $PEPE hits a new ATH? https://x.com/cryptofullsendr/status/1966948486139834414?s=46
kek Buy! πͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺ π Spent $3,075.47 (0.674 ETH) π Got 313,155,154,854 kek π€ Buyer / TX πͺ Position +15% πΈ Market Cap $4,146,087 DexT | Screener | Buy | Trending
πΈπ Around the 2016 U.S. presidential election, " $KEK " and $PEPE were co-opted by alt-right and white nationalist groups on forums like 4chan and Reddit. They created a satirical "religion" called the Cult of Kek, portraying Kek as a chaotic frog-headed deity and Pepe as its embodiment. This was used to troll political opponents, promote "meme magic" (the idea that memes could influence reality). πΉ https://dexscrβ¦
πππ take the yellow pill Faze banks is in https://x.com/cryptofullsendr/status/1865572427931218192?s=46
β€1π₯1
GM πβοΈπ https://x.com/cryptofullsendr/status/1864295295796039995?s=46
https://x.com/cryptofullsendr/status/1856621709195161961?s=46
β€1
Channel name was changed to Β«FullSend Gambles π€«Β»
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @fullsendrecords. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βFullSend Gambles π€«β (@fullsendrecords), 117 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fullsendrecords.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.