Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 禅城姚姚的朋友圈

Channel

禅城姚姚的朋友圈

@fuduib

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

118subscribers

+101 since we began measuring on 9 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004383980018
TypeChannel
Username@fuduib
Created21 August 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded11 September 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/fuduib

Growth

1711867.59 September 2026 — 17 subscribers11 September 2026 — 68 subscribers11 September 2026 — 68 subscribers19 September 2026 — 118 subscribers9 September 202619 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 10 days, net +101. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2–133 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 04:18118+50
11 Sept 2026, 17:2268no change
11 Sept 2026, 16:3868+51
9 Sept 2026, 14:4717first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 21 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
235.9%
avg views ÷ 118 subscribers
Avg views / post
278
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 September 2026
Posts held11 (21 August 2026 – 11 September 2026)
Views total2,227
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Sept 2026, 17:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

11 Sept 2026, 16:24 UTC9 viewsread 11 September 2026

【佛山报告】[https://t.me/FSqun] 【所在位置】:禅城 【老师艺名】:姚姚 【联系方式】:@yaoyaoqqer 【验证留名】:siwn zi 【验证时间】:2026.9.11 【上课打赏】:450P 【颜值身材】:颜值个人觉得中等偏上 【服务内容】:洗吹做 【服务态度】:态度非常好 【优点缺点】:450P,妹妹刚成年,纯女菩萨来的,全是优点,缺点是没有蛇,妹妹觉得难为情。妹妹不抽烟,没有纹身,熊B,看着很嫩,年轻就是好啊。 【推荐程度】:10分 【体验细节】:榜上看到妹妹的上榜信息,看头像长的深得我心,联系上后到达课室,妹妹给我开门,迎面上来就是一个娇羞的笑容,我上下打量妹妹,嗯,不错。妹妹也不着急,拉着我坐下,先短暂熟悉了一下,交完课费,妹妹帮我洗澡,我自己都不会洗那么仔细,妹妹特别温柔,出浴室还给我把水擦干净。妹妹属于敏感型的,建议师兄们多来点前戏挑逗一下她,因为妹妹是刚做,所以下面很紧,这次是妹妹自己急…

2 Sept 2026, 08:40 UTC385 viewsread 11 September 2026
Photo

🌹🌹🌹 来自 重庆🌹嫩妹🌹 ❤️ 艺名 姚姚 刚下海 年龄:08年 身高:161 体重:49Kg 🐻:36B 不抽烟🚬 没纹身 干净整洁。 🆚 课表: 69 制服选配 情趣用品 👙 丝袜 靴子👢 配合,甜美可爱😍 下面粉红玫瑰🌹 亲🐻🐻 👅🥚🥚口👄 陪洗浴🛀 等等…… 💗价格:450p(45分钟) 800pp(90分钟)pp 带现金 带现金💰 现金💰 安全第一 大数据时代 安全第一☝️ 🈲无🍑🈲拔🍑🈲庄机🈲醉酒🈲嗑药🈲

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @fuduib. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“禅城姚姚的朋友圈” (@fuduib), 118 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fuduib.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.