Channel
@fuckoffnoname
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
42subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002646146770 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fuckoffnoname |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fuckoffnoname |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 10:15 | 42 | no change |
| 15 Aug 2026, 10:02 | 42 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 27 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
7 reactions across 5 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👎 | 3 | 42.9% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 28.6% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 14.3% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 14.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 27 September 2025 to 28 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
I, strike666 retire from dox coms/ext coms and other shits, if someone gonna larp my alias "strike" let me know i quit coms nd the new owner of 666 is @feddingthem i will be still watching 666 nd telegram but not that much, sorry to anyone that wanted me to not quit, but i have to, every1 who is in com is just a damn social reject and get a LIFE, i got a gf that i really love and i will give her my life and she will …
❤1
Who is More Known?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
I, strike want to say that we do NOT collab with slit bunnies.
more known? (friendly)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Whos more known?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
more known
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Who’s More Known? (Friendly)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
does strike666 deserve ext hof
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👎1
We will bring back terror of 666. https://horrify.neocities.org
🔥2
What com is more known?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
We confirm that we collab with slit bunnies Terror with sb 666 x Slit bunnies
👎2
Final debunk on andrew larp, larping having rep perms nd owning 666, this is a fucking damn reatard and i will make sure everyone will fuck this nigga's reputation by this final debunk, so andrew claiming to be in coms nd other shit, saying he did NEVER forward a single shit to hes poll losing everything to my name S T R I K E 6 6 6, even larps own you reputation andrew, don't humble urself more my man, 666 is gettin…
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @fuckoffnoname. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 8 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Who is More Known?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
more known? (friendly)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Whos more known?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
more known
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Who’s More Known? (Friendly)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
does strike666 deserve ext hof
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 27 September 2025 to 28 September 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“debunks #fucklarps” (@fuckoffnoname), 42 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fuckoffnoname.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.