6 measurements spanning 41 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 433–436 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 08:41
433
-2
10 Sept 2026, 09:02
435
+2
31 Aug 2026, 02:59
433
-1
24 Aug 2026, 14:39
434
-2
8 Aug 2026, 05:16
436
no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:31
436
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 22 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4s
Average length
4s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
208 reactions across 16 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
65
31.3%
❤🔥
33
15.9%
😁
25
12.0%
custom 6325570379771283209
24
11.5%
💯
18
8.65%
🤣
18
8.65%
🔥
8
3.85%
✍
5
2.40%
🍓
4
1.92%
🤔
4
1.92%
🍌
3
1.44%
🤮
1
0.481%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 208 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 22 August 2025 to 31 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 18 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fuckitlby. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 August 2025 to 31 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🦦 ai - это пока сказки-сказки-сказки…
я недавно говорил с коллегой и он на полном серьезе мне пытался доказать, что дата-сайнтисты будут скоро не нужны
сейчас в последние годы идет жесткий бум на все эти замены, сокращения, бла-бла-бла
мы в ламоде с командой пилим fashion ai-экосистему, создавая виртуального стилиста - и пока спрос на реальных стилистов не упал
хиггсфилд делают инновационный продукт, но чудовищно…
🤒 я не самый лучший менеджер
за последние полгода в ламоде я сильно переосознал свои слабые и сильные стороны
во-первых, я понял, что я такой себе именно классический менеджер — который пушит процессы, бесконечно выстраивает коммуникацию, тащит пипл-менеджмент и живет в деливери-контуре
мне пришлось настраивать свой рабочий процесс буквально по ходу дела, потому что в ламоде де-факто нет отдельных проджектов, кото…
я вновь выпал из ведения телеграма и чёт очень тоскливо с этого, исправляюсь, теперь точно
в последнее время начал супер активно вайбкодить, до этого что-то делал на кодексе, но не структурно и без азарта, так как не возникало идей, которые хотелось довести до мвп
сейчас перешел на клод и это вау, антропик шагнули гораздо дальше опенаи, имхо
есть стойкое ощущение, что я опоздал, начав вайбкодить полгода назад
что …
ну что-ж, пора возвращаться в рабочий ритм, а то я уж совсем забылся
конец года выдался п**дец уставшим, мы запустили виртуальную примерку, потихоньку раскатываем чат-бота, все в формате эксперимента, скоро запустим еще один из продуктов в минимальной версии
конец года дал мне огромное количество опыта и выгорания, но стоило чуть отдохнуть и мы двигаемся дальше, посты обязательно будут и точно живые как раньше
коротко о моем онбординге в ламоде
первые две недели были с кайфом, поизучал слегка предыдущие а/б тесты, погрузился в стратегию компании, инициативы, задачи, поставил задачи на исследователей и дизайнеров, то есть было все достаточно спокойно
но в какой-то момент мы перешли от внутреннего ощущения спокойствия к планированию следующих кварталов и страт. защитам, а это та еще фигня
для тех, кто не в танке, проработ…
Мне сегодня снился странный сон, где Рома Маресов (руководитель екома в яндексе) и Дима Масюк (руководитель поиска) подъехали ко мне на двух мерседесах с охраной и уговаривали угрозами уйти в Яндекс, почему-то я в этот момент был около озера, что страшнее вдвойне
Далее мы уехали на майбахе в закат
Ну как вы думаете, согласился ли я уйти в Яндекс или нет?
я чесн слово не понимаю как люди раньше жили без ллмок, мне уже кажется, что 40% моей работы заключается в промпт-инжиниринге, а остальные 60% во встречах, лол
это тебе и личный ментор, и стратег, и разработчик, и дизайнер, и девушка, и друг
всё в одном
айтишкин мир насток тесен, что буквально месяц назад вы общаетесь с командой и фаундером aiuta
а потом выходит интервью у осетинской с ним
константин очень крутой, посмотрел на одном дыхании
https://youtu.be/-8zrQggsVJU?si=w2tQDE2Miiwd4tPM
крч, тут моя команда выкатила нейрообразы на главной, пока в а/б тесте, так что можете обновиться до новой версии приложения и понять есть ли вы в тестовой группе, или застряли в контроле
но если вы в тесте, то выкупите плиз что-то из образов, нам надо nmv растить
началось
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=LTYMWadOW7c&feature=youtu.be
❤2😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @fuckitlby. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
обратно в сбер aka премия в размере шестизначной зарплаты11%
в втб упаси-боже1%
в plata к бывшим выходцам из тинькофф28%
в вк порождать новые убытки4%
в ламоду покупать нижнее белье19%
в какой-то ноунейм25%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 22 August 2025 to 31 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@fuckitlby named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@pmwhite named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“fuckit + fuckit” (@fuckitlby), 433 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fuckitlby.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.