Channel name was changed to «此群組自我毀滅,請立即退群!»
Channel
此群組自我毀滅,請立即退群!
@fuckingpopointhisgroup
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
494subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001317247198 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fuckingpopointhisgroup |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 5 January 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fuckingpopointhisgroup |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:06 | 494 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:47 | 495 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:10 | 495 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 5 January 2020 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 January 2020. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
Channel photo removed
#0111 #全城連儂日
各位觀塘人同我聽住, 如果你哋真係唔想個音樂噴泉起得成, 麻煩立即搞一個反音樂噴泉遊行!小白象工程絕對不能上馬!
舊職業翻身!文宣勇武! 所謂嘅文宣勇武簡單啲來講就係文宣派前線! 文宣勇武為何要特別提醒出現呢? 1.根據現在狀況,不能讓運動自然熄滅。 2.受到藍屍前線嘅啟發,佢哋大量搵人剷除連儂牆,證明我哋對了。 3.組成團隊,相對一個人更加安全。 其實呢一個職業一直以來都出現,只係沒有特別名稱而已。 還記得未有勇武的時候嗎? 大量連儂牆的出現,團結香港的和理非。 現在再起連儂牆,已經冇以前咁強勢,但係游擊文宣,將會係一個方法。 行動建議, 1.分序文宣,(黑警派,活動派,五大訴求派等等) 2.組團(5-6人) 3.靜靜雞咁行動 4.靜雞雞咁四散 地點,全香港嘅土地 光復香港,時代革命! 五大訴求,缺一不可! 記住帶口罩!武漢有肺炎啊!
https://t.me/hkvote/238
經過六個月抗爭,普通人對警察的思想。 半年後,可以做一個簡單分析。 本人看見721事件, 直接進入仇警狀態,永不翻身。 而我仇嘅係黑警。 首先我係同意現在有三萬個黑警,我仇恨嘅係現今這一隊三萬黑警。 第一點,我會提出必定要先解決元朗所有黑警,因為佢哋係始作俑者。 第二點,就係清算黑社會大佬鄧炳強以及盧偉聰。佢哋包庇黑社會,犯下道德上嘅嚴重罪行,應該判處死刑。 第三點,就係清算黑警內部的強姦犯殺人犯,以及前線的防暴黑社會冒警人員,因為佢哋冇身份,所以無後顧之憂。(唔記得邊個仆街講嘅) 第四點,完成以上三點,基本上就可以解散警隊。 特別注意嘅係,警察公關江永祥謝振中呢一班仆街永遠要返大灣區。 記住一句話保平安, 我哋仇嘅係黑警, 而藍屍支持嘅正正就係黑警。 無人會憎恨白警, 正常而正義嘅警察, 正如我一開頭所說,而家個社會搞到咁,正正就係香港擁有三萬個黑警。 黑目字 13:02,07.01.2020
Photo, posted without a caption
【香港2020設立立法會普選】正式成為美國法律,點解無人提?立即整次遊行向美國領事及國會提交2020普選立法會細節啊!! https://lih.kg/1812580 - 分享自 LIHKG 討論區 2020普選主要行動: 1. 黎個遊行/集會向美領及國會提交普選細節,及寫信、twitter比國會議員,亦要叫IAD,攬炒團隊,gphone,現任立法會議員幫手(see post #1) 2. 加入工會,全民三罷 逼港共中共退讓 (當年波蘭都係靠罷工lin贏共產政權 https://www.instagram.com/p/B4Z-paCn0zr/?igshid=1jridkza9vxy8 ) 3. 尋求將普選放在trade deal phase 2 [國際戰線第一步][聯署]將香港真雙普選推上中美貿易談判桌 https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/appeal-add-genuine…
Photo, posted without a caption
太子裝了新型監控燈柱,推到前線睇到 https://lih.kg/1699142 - 分享自 LIHKG 討論區
https://www.facebook.com/1430921663796063/posts/2640539176167633/?d=n
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @fuckingpopointhisgroup. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
你觉得香港警察殘暴鎮壓示威者是反人类行為嗎?
- 我是香港人,我認為 "是"43%
- 我是香港人, 我認為"不是"3%
- 我是大陸人,我認為 "是"34%
- 我是大陸人,我認為 "不是"8%
- 我是台灣人,我認為 "是"3%
- 我是台灣人,我認為 "不是"1%
- 我是其他地方華人,我認為 "是"6%
- 我是其他地方華人,我認為 "不是"2%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
「改名」唔應該叫建制派‼‼ 應該叫…
- 反對派10%
- 反民主派11%
- 共派16%
- 親共派47%
- 親中派16%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 January 2020 to 9 January 2020. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,080,825 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“此群組自我毀滅,請立即退群!” (@fuckingpopointhisgroup), 494 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fuckingpopointhisgroup.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.