Channel
@fs_challenge
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
15,323subscribers
+130 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001704756533 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fs_challenge |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fs_challenge |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026, 21:28 | 15,323 | -6 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:01 | 15,329 | -7 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 18:35 | 15,336 | -13 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 17:47 | 15,349 | -15 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:57 | 15,364 | -18 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:13 | 15,382 | -19 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:04 | 15,401 | -8 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 10:25 | 15,409 | -5 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:44 | 15,414 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:33 | 15,416 | +9 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:34 | 15,407 | +18 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:32 | 15,389 | +22 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:34 | 15,367 | +166 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:33 | 15,201 | +8 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:07 | 15,193 | first reading |
222 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 32 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 166 of 214 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 222 (4 August 2026 – 21 August 2026) |
| Views total | 339,449 |
| Reactions total | 753 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Aug 2026, 00:04 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
753 reactions across 153 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 592 | 78.6% | |
| 👍 | 118 | 15.7% | |
| 🙏 | 13 | 1.73% | |
| 👏 | 12 | 1.59% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 1.06% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 0.531% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 0.266% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.133% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.133% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.133% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.133% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 166 of the 222 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 753reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 222 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
I hear and I forget. I see and I remember. I do and I understand. Confucius said that a long time ago, but it's a good reminder for why showing up to the Feng Shui Summit in person matters. You've put in the study. The Feng Shui Summit is where it gets tested against what's actually happening right now, real cases, current elements, and what's coming for the year ahead. It tends to land differently once you see h…
❤3
🚨FINAL CALL: Feng Shui Academy 2026 enrollment closes soon. This is your final opportunity to gain full access to the complete curriculum, chart plotting tools, and live coaching through the Feng Shui Lab, along with the early enrollment bonuses that won't be offered again. Once the cart closes, doors won't reopen until the next intake. Secure your spot before it's gone: www.joeyyap.com/learnfengshui
❤2
⏰ 1 hour left. The cart for Feng Shui Academy 2026 closes very soon. If you've been meaning to enroll, now is the time. After this, the doors close until the next intake. 🔥Secure your spot now: www.joeyyap.com/learnfengshui
❤2
🇸🇬 Gardens by the Bay. 29-31 Aug 2026. A room full of serious Feng Shui students, live Q&A, and a completely different energy than watching alone from your screen. 🎟️ Your VIP Ticket (worth $1,997) gets you sharper focus, direct access to ask Joey your specific questions, and the momentum that only comes from learning in person with people as committed as you. FREE as a Fast Action bonus, first 100 buyers only. 🔥…
❤3
Connection isn't something you force. It's something you attract. Like blossoms drawn to spring, the right energy in your space naturally pulls in warmth, charm, and harmony, in your relationships, your family, your friendships. Get the environment right, and people notice, even if they can't say why. Your journey starts at www.joeyyap.com/learnfengshui.
⏰ 3 hours left. Feng Shui Academy 2026 enrollment is closing soon. If you've been on the fence, the time to decide is now. After this, you'll need to wait for the next round, without the current bonuses. Secure your spot: www.joeyyap.com/learnfengshui
The value is not the number of videos or bonuses. It is your ability to understand what is wrong and finally know what to do. Join the Feng Shui Academy now: www.joeyyap.com/learnfengshui
Having the same relationship problem over and over again? 😩 You’ve talked about it. You’ve tried to fix it. Somehow, you still end up having the same conversation. Here’s something you probably haven’t tried yet, use the Feng Shui Explorer to find the sector connected to the relationship issue, then actually use that space when you sit down and have the conversation. Because Feng Shui isn’t here to magically fix y…
❤2
Sometimes you can spend years learning, searching, and trying to figure out what you’re missing… only to realise you were missing the right way to apply what you already knew. That’s what really stood out to us in Marlyna’s story. ❤️ She had been searching for answers for years, but once she learned how to actually apply Feng Shui, things started to change. And hearing that her income quadrupled over 10 years and …
❤1
⏰ 6 hours left. Feng Shui Academy 2026 closes today. This is your window to secure full access to the program and lock in the early bonuses before they're gone for good. Don't let this close without you in it. 👉🏼 Enroll now: www.joeyyap.com/learnfengshui
🎬 VIP access, just for you. The complete replay of Life Force Energy Live is available now. Go back through any part you missed, or revisit what stood out most. Watch here: https://www.joeyyap.com/FengShuiFlow
From buried in debt to finding a way forward. Jennel turned to Feng Shui at one of the hardest points in his life, and by applying what he learned and helping others along the way, he transformed his finances, found purpose, and opened up new opportunities. Proof that the right knowledge, applied consistently, changes everything. Ready to start your own transformation? Feng Shui Academy 2026 is open now: www.joeyy…
Showing the 12 most recent of 222 posts we hold for @fs_challenge. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@fs_challenge edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 26,079 of 1,584,420entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Joey Yap's Life Force Energy 2026” (@fs_challenge), 15,323 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fs_challenge.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.