Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Joey Yap

Channel

Joey Yap

@realjoeyyap

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

59,095subscribers

-1,430 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001421114784
TypeChannel
Username@realjoeyyap
DescriptionThe official channel for JOEY YAP. Start here: https://joeyyap.link/tribemembersonly
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 November 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live23 October 2026
Measurements held47
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 23 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/realjoeyyap

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

59,09560,52559,8106 August 2026 — 60,525 subscribers6 August 2026 — 60,522 subscribers7 August 2026 — 60,505 subscribers8 August 2026 — 60,496 subscribers9 August 2026 — 60,484 subscribers10 August 2026 — 60,461 subscribers11 August 2026 — 60,440 subscribers12 August 2026 — 60,425 subscribers14 August 2026 — 60,396 subscribers15 August 2026 — 60,367 subscribers16 August 2026 — 60,352 subscribers18 August 2026 — 60,315 subscribers19 August 2026 — 60,289 subscribers20 August 2026 — 60,276 subscribers21 August 2026 — 60,258 subscribers22 August 2026 — 60,233 subscribers23 August 2026 — 60,184 subscribers25 August 2026 — 60,155 subscribers26 August 2026 — 60,139 subscribers27 August 2026 — 60,117 subscribers28 August 2026 — 60,096 subscribers29 August 2026 — 60,081 subscribers30 August 2026 — 60,064 subscribers31 August 2026 — 60,046 subscribers1 September 2026 — 60,024 subscribers2 September 2026 — 60,003 subscribers3 September 2026 — 59,980 subscribers5 September 2026 — 59,950 subscribers8 September 2026 — 59,894 subscribers11 September 2026 — 59,817 subscribers13 September 2026 — 59,783 subscribers14 September 2026 — 59,769 subscribers16 September 2026 — 59,747 subscribers19 September 2026 — 59,700 subscribers26 September 2026 — 59,586 subscribers4 October 2026 — 59,432 subscribers9 October 2026 — 59,347 subscribers13 October 2026 — 59,286 subscribers14 October 2026 — 59,265 subscribers15 October 2026 — 59,238 subscribers16 October 2026 — 59,222 subscribers17 October 2026 — 59,189 subscribers18 October 2026 — 59,169 subscribers20 October 2026 — 59,154 subscribers21 October 2026 — 59,141 subscribers22 October 2026 — 59,124 subscribers23 October 2026 — 59,095 subscribers6 August 202623 October 2026
47 measurements spanning 78 days, net -1,430. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 58,881–60,740 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 47
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
23 Oct 2026, 08:0059,095-29
22 Oct 2026, 07:5759,124-17
21 Oct 2026, 03:3959,141-13
20 Oct 2026, 00:3659,154-15
18 Oct 2026, 22:3959,169-20
17 Oct 2026, 22:0659,189-33
16 Oct 2026, 19:4759,222-16
15 Oct 2026, 17:4459,238-27
14 Oct 2026, 17:4959,265-21
13 Oct 2026, 07:3459,286-61
9 Oct 2026, 02:0159,347-85
4 Oct 2026, 13:3659,432-154
26 Sept 2026, 03:3859,586-114
19 Sept 2026, 08:3959,700-47
16 Sept 2026, 19:1859,747-22
14 Sept 2026, 21:0259,769-14
13 Sept 2026, 05:5759,783-34
11 Sept 2026, 10:0259,817-77
8 Sept 2026, 13:4059,894-56
5 Sept 2026, 08:5959,950first reading

Engagement

73 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 159 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.6%
avg views ÷ 59,095 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,060
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.502%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 73 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 October 2026
Posts held73 (9 July 2026 – 23 October 2026)
Views total185,420
Reactions total931
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Oct 2026, 09:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,290
Videos
≈113
Links
≈782

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
15m 02s
Average length
2m 09s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,988 reactions across 73 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2,77169.5%
👍82420.7%
🔥1694.24%
🎉1233.08%
🤩380.953%
😁340.853%
🙏200.502%
😱90.226%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 73 of the 73 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,988 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 73 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 23 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Oct 2026, 07:03 UTC≈1,570 views9 reactionsread 23 October 2026
Photo

A quick Self-Test. It only takes a few minutes to see which intuitive style you get. Take the self-test here -Admin

👍7❤2

22 Oct 2026, 23:33 UTC≈3,170 views19 reactionsread 23 October 2026

KNOWING EVERY SYMBOL IS NOT YET READING You recognise the components. You remember the names. Then someone asks what the reading means, and your answer becomes a list. One symbol suggests this. Another adds that. A third complicates both. The person is still waiting for an answer to the original question. The next stage of learning is understanding how the components work together. THE ARCHITECTURE OF A QIMEN O…

❤12👍6🔥1

22 Oct 2026, 07:01 UTC≈4,080 views11 reactionsread 23 October 2026
Photo

We've put together a short quiz to help you discover your natural intuitive style. Take the quiz here -Admin

👍11

22 Oct 2026, 04:15 UTC≈4,280 views11 reactionsread 23 October 2026
Photo

Here's a quick and simple way to catch up on Part 1 in just 12 minutes. Click here to watch – Admin P.S. For the go-getters who don't want to miss a single detail or golden nugget from the training, the full replay is available with VIP access. Watch it anytime, at your own pace. Check out VIP access here

❤5👍3🤩2🔥1

22 Oct 2026, 00:02 UTC≈4,390 views24 reactionsread 23 October 2026

A BRILLIANT FIGHTER IN THE WRONG WAR An attractive partnership can make you very busy before you have decided whether it deserves you. You calculate the return. Discuss the launch. Think about the people you will hire. Meanwhile, one question remains underneath the activity: What, exactly, are you entering? A commercially workable arrangement can still place you in a role you do not want. You may solve every exe…

👍11❤9🎉2🔥2

21 Oct 2026, 00:03 UTC≈5,100 views38 reactionsread 23 October 2026

THE ANSWER BEGINS BEFORE THE CHART “Will this work?” It sounds like a question. But what does “work” mean? More money? Less pressure? A business that survives its first year? A role that prepares you to lead? You can spend an hour interpreting a QiMen Oracle chart and still leave confused if the question asks several different things at once. Before interpreting anything, decide what kind of understanding you ne…

❤25👍9🔥4

21 Oct 2026, 00:01 UTC≈4,870 views29 reactionsread 23 October 2026

Hey tribe, For those who don’t particularly enjoy joining livestream trainings, but still enjoy knowing things… I have something for you. Over the coming days, I’ll share a series of short reads here alongside YOUR NEXT MOVE. A few ideas I’ve collected about decisions, intuition and the art of QiMen Divination. Each comes with something to think about or try in your own life. Read them over coffee. Between meetin…

❤24👍5

20 Oct 2026, 13:42 UTC≈5,450 views29 reactionsread 23 October 2026
Video

You'll love this, check them out here

❤24👍3🔥1🤩1

20 Oct 2026, 12:00 UTC≈5,850 views22 reactionsread 23 October 2026
Photo

🚨Starting in a few minutes. Come join me now Tribe. Click here to login

❤15👍7

19 Oct 2026, 03:20 UTC≈8,440 views47 reactionsread 23 October 2026
Photo

It's TOMORROW! Hey Tribe, Tomorrow, we're kicking off YOUR NEXT MOVE, my biggest livestream training yet on Qi Men Dun Jia. This is a once-a-year event, and registration is completely FREE. All you need to do is show up. I've spent quite some time putting this together, and I'm excited to finally share it with you. Whether you're completely new to QiMen or have been studying with me for years, there's something …

❤33👍8🔥6

18 Oct 2026, 05:38 UTC≈7,190 views29 reactionsread 23 October 2026
Photo

🧭️️️️️️ We're 2 days from the event. 👉️️️️️️ All the details you need here If you want replays and access to Part 5, remember to check out the VIP experience ⭐️️️️️️️ Speak soon.

❤21👍8

17 Oct 2026, 07:55 UTC≈9,820 views48 reactionsread 23 October 2026
Photo

I've been looking forward to showing you this. Heres the complete training framework for YOUR NEXT MOVE And we're going to cover quite a bit. Over five specially designed sessions, I'll introduce you to the fascinating Art of QiMen Divination, from understanding what lies beyond conventional analysis to learning how to read the Oracle Chart and interpret the forces at play. Whether you're completely new to QiMen o…

❤31👍17

Showing the 12 most recent of 73 posts we hold for @realjoeyyap. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@realjoeyyap edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 October 2026
Most recent edit
8 October 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Piranha Profits™ Online Trading School
@piranhaprofits · 22,751
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 September 2026
Majlis Keselamatan Negara (Rasmi)
@mknrasmi · 612,433
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 13 August 2026
CPRC Kementerian Kesihatan Malaysia
@cprckkm · 342,502
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 13 August 2026
MKN Sabah (Majlis Keselamatan Negara Negeri Sabah)
@mknsabah · 32,556
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 20 September 2026
中国报 China Press
@chinapressonline · 23,255
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 19 September 2026
The Star (Official)
@thestar_official · 32,316
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 5 September 2026
EdgeProp SG
@edgepropsg · 21,469
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 23 September 2026
Sihat Milikku - Kementerian Kesihatan Malaysia @MyHEALTHKKM
@sihatmilikbersama · 40,818
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 29 August 2026
Sharix.my
@harryt30tybjb · 32,358
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 4 September 2026
Goody Feed SG
@goodyfeedsg · 38,483
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 31 August 2026
RHB Investment Bank Official
@RHBInvestmentBankOfficial · 20,316
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 28 September 2026

This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Joey Yap” (@realjoeyyap), 59,095 subscribers as measured 23 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/realjoeyyap.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.