⭐️я не могу найти НОРМАЛЬНОЕ место, чтобы засрать этот блог!!! 😭 ⭐ 🔢🔢🔢🔢🔢🔢🔢🔢🔢🔢 ✨✨✨✨✨по дорамам . . . 👀« у этого саппа слишком однотипные посты . . 😰 » ⭐ ✍️ « мой любимый блог ушёл в архив!1!!!! 😭 » 🎤 « этот танос меня уже ЗАЕБАЛ/» 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ⭐ здесь ты можешь высказать мнение насчёт любого блога по дорамам или спросить обо ✨✨✨✨, касаемо этой сферы 🎀канал был …

Channel
ㅤᛝ . 𝖿᧐ᥙ𝗋 𝗌ᥙit̸𝗌
@fs1net
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
15subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004305079342 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fs1net |
| Created | 7 July 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fs1net |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:33 | 15 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:30 | 16 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:15 | 16 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 113.3%
- avg views ÷ 15 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 17.0
- 2 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 2
- of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (7 July 2026 – 20 July 2026) |
| Views total | 34 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 22:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
🌟 — слушаем и не осуждаем: мне не нравится игрок *** слушаем и не осуждаем: я считаю что у Ки Хуна изначально был ужасный план! — 🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 ✉️✉️🎀🎀👾оитесь, что вас осудят за ваше мн🔡ние в фд "игра в кальмара"?🐈⬛ Вам к нам! — Приветствую вас в "Слушаем и не осуждаем || ИВК"❤️ 👾десь вы можете поделиться своим мнением, и вас никто не осудит🇧🇳 😀😀😀😀 🇺🇳авигация🤩
Sticker, posted without a caption
🔹авигация . . rt postㅤmp post🤩🤩 ㅤrulesㅤ🧪ㅤrolesㅤcanons questionnaireㅤ events ㅤㅤboostㅤ🤩🤩ㅤplot & ㅤ ︎︎ㅤㅤoverheardㅤ︎💼 vote & ︎︎︎︎ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ︎︎︎︎︎︎︎︎︎︎︎folder . .
Sticker, posted without a caption
🔹vents …ㅤ:ㅤ🤩 ㅤ🫧🫧 . кто знает, что ㅤㅤㅤㅤбудет завтра или же ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ послезавтра .. О1 … 🥬ока ничего не случилось .
Sticker, posted without a caption
🔹anons …ㅤ:ㅤ🤩 ㅤ🤩🤩🤩 . сможете ли вы ㅤㅤㅤㅤнайти свою вторую ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤполовинку здесь🌟 О1 … 🥬ока никто не нашёл свою судьбу .
Sticker, posted without a caption
🖤🖤ㅤ:ㅤ🔹uestionnaire … шабл🥬🥬 анкеты ! (( копируется при нажатии. )) О.1 псевдоним, местоимения, юз О.2 роль, из какой дорамы О.3 карта, её масть + почему именно такой выбор? (масти означают разные значения) О.4 характер от 4 предложений О.5 два поста от 5 предложений О.6 как реагирует на карты выше? 🥬от для ваших анкетㅤ: t.me/f_sNetbot 🖤 🔹уби — люди с высоким интеллектом, решают вопросы логикой и всегда знают, что …
Sticker, posted without a caption
🖤🖤ㅤ:ㅤ🔡 🔹нтересно, какая же будет следующая карта в этой школе ? ㅤㅤ🌟🌟 . сможете ли вы ㅤㅤудержать свою масть ㅤㅤㅤ или же упадёте на дно ? 📌 — бронь. 🔎 — в активном поиске. ❗ — ожидание канала. список в комментариях … 🤩
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @fs1net. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 964,341 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ㅤᛝ . 𝖿᧐ᥙ𝗋 𝗌ᥙit̸𝗌” (@fs1net), 15 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fs1net.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.